I am a long time lurker and active on LSA. I had some time and did the reading here. I can clearly see why Anna Scamma is so attractive to so many women and I want to debunk a big myth about her success of 2nd course. Let's start with the money. No, she didn't get 1000 or more subscribers. Discord doesn't count as you could log in by simply using a link which led to a lot or 'lurkers' joining in which later on prompted even as unenlightened creature like her to look into who's there and ban a few members from leaking the access. Also, who can say that the server wasn't shared with some other scamma
as there were only couple of tens, mostly 40-50 active members at any given time of the day. The real number of 'students' who purchased are close to 120-130 and I am being generous here. How do I know that? Well, because I've seen the comments before Discord was activated at the very beginning of joining the course and some comments come from the same person or replies. Plus some students did demand a refund and some smart(er) ones, like my source, shared their costs among themselves. But that's a big shhh! On LSA I posted the texts of what this course is all about, plus minus the ones without scripted material below her videos, that also excludes the workbooks and some extra files but as I said - you ladies aren't missing anything. Now why is someone like Anna getting views and students following her? It doesn't take a psychology PhD, though that's helpful
, to see that women have long complained about 'where have all the good men gone', way before Anna the Scamma become a thing. Women want to believe that there's a shortcut to the rich lifestyle and attracting rich man and that someone holds the secrets to it. Even the smart businesswomen who don't need a man, still want to believe that it simply because it's attractive dream but they were the ones who were the first disappointed with the course and left early (and I hope they got their money back, not because they needed it but just because! as I hear it was difficult for some). Her followers are simply in love with the idea that they are on the right track now and now they are going to attract the man and the lifestyle. Here's one thing that I have not yet seen posted. Anna is creating her clones on purpose - to sabotage girls who might actually have a shot at getting the lifestyle she wanted. That's why she fishes for 'success stories' and tags and likes the good reviews of disillusioned girls like New Rose Glow. And that's why we see her breaking her own teachings so often. It's the same with those bulky, overweight, jealous women attacking Victoria Secret models - hate on the success and try to brainwash the mass for dropping the standards so you might actually then get a chance or at least you won't feel so lonely. Some of the former students of hers are rebranding themselves and actually aren't afraid to look feminine, sensual and elegant at the same time. Anna can only afford second hand or cheapest items with flashy brands because she simply cannot afford it, as she doesn't even own an apartment, yet alone a house! But the worst part is a Stockholm's Syndrome of her students. Now I cannot say exactly what my source said when I pointed out that Anna seems fishy, because it would clearly betray who I am but it goes in the same lines as someone already posted on many platforms - that anna can hustle her scam and this is the fact that some students, who found her dubious, cling as an explanation as to why her material is worth a thousand dollars. I repeat, they actually praise her for her scamming abilities as a coping mechanism not to face the truth that they've been scammed.
