I was surprised that he was so upset by people commenting negatively about him being their doctor given his social media presence. By that I mean, sure it’s not nice to be called a bellend, or to hear that people question your ability as a doctor based on your content/personality (which I agree is a tad unfair). But if you put yourself online and then have a job working with the public, then the odds are you will encounter people who know your online presence and don’t particularly care for it or the creator. It’s like he doesn’t expect his online presence to have any (negative) bearing on his work as a doctor. I personally don’t think it has a bearing on his ability, but I would find it uncomfortable to not have distance/anonymity from my doctor because I know from YouTube he does X and Y.I've never come across an influencer who openly talks about reading on tattle or even making a video out of it? Plus there's only a few pages of gossip on here so was it worth making a video out of it? It's so mild compared to other threads. (Guess it was worth it because he got his £££)
I empathise - it's no picnic to read negative comments about yourself and your work, and he was understandably hurt. However, people are within their rights to post their thoughts on him and his content here, and no one is making Ali read the thread. I hope he chooses not to read further comments.I think this thread should be closed now, he doesn't like the comments and it's personally affecting hiim
Compared to most threads here, this is crazy tame (which I think I said in a previous comment). He's chosen to be an influencer and so has to be open to criticism. Same as any brand or company.I know what you mean but some comments on here attacking his looks and his personal life are a bit too far, he’s not a bad guy
Wow. If he's like that outside of his medical life then what is he like as a doctor. Not all doctors are saints, but this is super sneaky. As annoying as Dr Alex is and ignoring the fact that he was on love island, at least he uses his social media presence for good. He's constantly talking about healthcare as well as things in his personal life, but at least he's doing things that show he's interested in people's wellbeing. It's not constant ads without declaring it's an ad, or trying to sell these expensive courses to people, or all about money/trying to get rich quick bullshit. I mean let's not lie, Dr Alex obviously enjoys the pay and attention YT gives people, but you can see his content actually shows his passion for medicine.There’s another quite relevant problem.
for example, on the part time YouTube academy course he created is used some strategies that go against the consumers act in the UK. In another words, he’s breaking the law.
Firstly, the cost of his course went up by over 300%. Legal but very greedy.
then a month before the second cohort went on sale, he increased the promotion of the course at the same time he removed the pricing information from the website.
His promos always mentioned that there’s a cap on participants so “be aware of that when we go live with sales and joining the mailing list”.
This means that a lot of people went to the website to get more information knowing that most likely he was going to be oversubscribed but no price information.
Then, at 4pm tickets went on sale for people to realise that the ticket cost a small fortune. Knowing that most likely is going to be oversubscribed people didn’t want to risk not getting a place and bought a ticket. This is an illegal practice and considered sales under pressure.
This are techniques that most likely he learnt in the book “oversubscribed”. What he forgets is that in Europe, consumer law is always on the side of the consumer.
On the example I referred he made many hundred of thousands of pounds of sales under pressure. I might need some of that money to pay for legal fees and compensation.
Report him, the asa is a good place to start!There’s another quite relevant problem.
for example, on the part time YouTube academy course he created is used some strategies that go against the consumers act in the UK. In another words, he’s breaking the law.
Firstly, the cost of his course went up by over 300%. Legal but very greedy.
then a month before the second cohort went on sale, he increased the promotion of the course at the same time he removed the pricing information from the website.
His promos always mentioned that there’s a cap on participants so “be aware of that when we go live with sales and joining the mailing list”.
This means that a lot of people went to the website to get more information knowing that most likely he was going to be oversubscribed but no price information.
Then, at 4pm tickets went on sale for people to realise that the ticket cost a small fortune. Knowing that most likely is going to be oversubscribed people didn’t want to risk not getting a place and bought a ticket. This is an illegal practice and considered sales under pressure.
This are techniques that most likely he learnt in the book “oversubscribed”. What he forgets is that in Europe, consumer law is always on the side of the consumer.
On the example I referred he made many hundred of thousands of pounds of sales under pressure. I might need some of that money to pay for legal fees and compensation.
Wow, this is quite something.There’s another quite relevant problem.
for example, on the part time YouTube academy course he created is used some strategies that go against the consumers act in the UK. In another words, he’s breaking the law.
Firstly, the cost of his course went up by over 300%. Legal but very greedy.
then a month before the second cohort went on sale, he increased the promotion of the course at the same time he removed the pricing information from the website.
His promos always mentioned that there’s a cap on participants so “be aware of that when we go live with sales and joining the mailing list”.
This means that a lot of people went to the website to get more information knowing that most likely he was going to be oversubscribed but no price information.
Then, at 4pm tickets went on sale for people to realise that the ticket cost a small fortune. Knowing that most likely is going to be oversubscribed people didn’t want to risk not getting a place and bought a ticket. This is an illegal practice and considered sales under pressure.
This are techniques that most likely he learnt in the book “oversubscribed”. What he forgets is that in Europe, consumer law is always on the side of the consumer.
On the example I referred he made many hundred of thousands of pounds of sales under pressure. I might need some of that money to pay for legal fees and compensation.
[What I think Taimur was trying to get Ali to do is say] how the book should be something he should be proud of. A have a meaningful purpose. Something he can look back on, regardless of sales and be glad he did it the way he did. Ali brushed this off by saying something along the lines of "people don't want meaningful. They want catch phrases". He then went on to support his statement by backing it up with data that suggests this. - When he changed a youtube title, his use of thumb nails etc. Anyway, he basically came to the conclusion that this book is being written in a way and with techniques that can capture the highest amount of possible sales. Ugh.. completely soulless and scummy.
Maybe this is why he cant admit that mean comments make him sad? Because hes not proud if his work. Its purely for the purpose of business. Hes emotionally void from it. To be fair to him, I work as a delivery driver and could give two shits when people complain as I'm emotionally void from work too. The difference is, he can control what he creates, he doesn't have to be this money focused surface level bs machine.
the first cohort course costed $399. The current one costed $1499. It’s greedy but legal.Wow, this is quite something.
What was the price of his course thing before the 300% (!!) increase?
Business is business but that is an incredibly transactional way to view your subscribers. He's mentioned before how he's a rationalist and I think (correct me if I'm wrong) that he struggled with empathy. I think his focus on efficiency plays into being 'rational' in business.
There was this comment on Reddit about the podcast episode which I'll quote part of here because it's relevant to the discussion:
If he's worried about people judging him, maybe he shouldn't have bailed out of working for the NHS during a global pandemic in order to write a book/post videos on YT.He’s becoming a fake productivity guru
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?