Neil Sean
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Ugh, just stay away Harry, WE DON'T WANT YOU HERE!
Thank you so much for this, it's so soothingAwww, this is a beautiful set of clips.
ETA
Harkles make me angry, but William and Catherine sooth and bring on happy thoughts.
The rumours about Mike and Invictus are rattling the Squaddies.
Do they not realise he isn't Hazbeen who's been spoonfed all his life.
Mike was a world-class sportsman before he even had Anne as a MiL.
And he has his own successful projects because of his own talent. He'd take on Invictus as a favour.
Wonder if old Haz has overcome his security fears to try and put paid to the Mike stuff.
Do they not realise he isn't Hazbeen who's been spoonfed all his life.
Mike was a world-class sportsman before he even had Anne as a MiL.
And he has his own successful projects because of his own talent. He'd take on Invictus as a favour.
Wonder if old Haz has overcome his security fears to try and put paid to the Mike stuff.
I want to know who returned the jam.
Are we supposed to be as joyful and happy with his announcement as we are with the Kings announcement?
It ain't happening here folks.
Wouldn’t it be glorious if Catherine, Princess of Wales was well enough to attend the first one. After it was confirmed Hairy had arrived solo.
You're completely right about their public image and lack of work ethic. They are both too arrogant and stupid to understand how they appear to the public.
The kids mystery is the only thing that still keeps me interested in them. I have been a firm believer of the surrogacy theory but as time goes on I do think it's likely that Meghan did birth Fark herself to ensure her lasting ticket and connection to the RF. It's what all great gold diggers do to ensure the money stream will last.
I've no idea about Lilibucks and I doubt if we'll ever know the truth. It's interesting that the Harkles have never addressed the online rumours regarding surrogacy. Have they ever said anything to debunk these theories? That in itself is suspicious but the golden ticket of their kids being the Kings grandchildren must be maintained at all costs. They will not enter into a debate because they akready have their children in the line of succession with princely titles. They don't need to do anything, the non believers have to prove otherwise and exposure will never be possible due to data protection laws.
Lady C knows no more than the rest of us on Tattle and can't prove anything. If she persists attempts will be made to shut her down. Look at what has happened to Piers Morgan and Dan Wootton. Both had highly successful careers and have lost their positions so both are now reduced to running their own media channels reaching a far smaller audience. Lady C is not in their league in terms of public awareness and reach in the media.
On the Twatter today are a few pics of them at the Inskip wedding.
Nice to see that little game play of hers is also gaining wider audience.
That old saying "it will all come out in the wash" comes to mind.
Nice to see that little game play of hers is also gaining wider audience.
That old saying "it will all come out in the wash" comes to mind.
I’m sure that’s a doll. It’s too limp, any child would be more animated seeing a birthday cake.
Even Archie wasn’t impressed by it
Every so often, I come across another image that shows how fugly Hazno is.
Wonder what Smeg will plan to overshadow this state visit?
I think there is nothing, from the Palace, stopping journalists to write about it. I think it is a dodgy legal territory and Hazno has proved he doesn't hesitate taking the press to court. I think it is the press legal departments stopping the stories. That said the palace has put their head in a hole regarding this subject.Dan Wootton and Lady C might have been "clear there's no super-injunction", but they're playing with words. We're all aware that there's been a press blackout on investigating or discussing anything negative about the Sussexes or their offspring for over 5 years. Call it what you will, injunction, gagging, super-injunction, blackout, it's there and will be until the Monarch decides otherwise.
These journalists and royal experts think the public are living under a rock, that they as experts know best and will tell us the facts and that we will believe them. They're so obviously not telling the truth. They too are bound by the "super-injunction" they say doesn't exist, and are following it obediently.
If there's no "super-injunction", why don't George and Dan bravely discuss the pregnancy fraud and fake photoshopped christening live on TV? Discuss the LoS fraud too while they're at it? Free speech? Thought not. Duh.
That's why she's pussy-footing around the subject, telling us to write to the Palace! Isn't that her job? Been there, done that, thanks.
ETA Brilliant letter @Stargazerlily ...well done
Don't buy it!
It doesn't cover well, even with numerous coats it looks blotchy and you get a lighter stripe at the top
A few Telegraph articles
archive.md
archive.md
Weird - the Telegraph ones are previewing and the Mail aren't!
Prince Harry's Apache pilot instructor: Duke was wrong to say how man…
archived 28 Apr 2024 07:12:33 UTC
Prince Harry 'snubs the King' by not wearing Coronation medal
archived 27 Apr 2024 12:43:57 UTC
Weird - the Telegraph ones are previewing and the Mail aren't!
Jars of jam #51-100 with fresh lemons in the basket and Harold giving John Rambo a Veteran of the Year award
I mean... I don't kiss people I barely know for photos. The thing is, I believe, the Toronto friendships were all convenience friendships, as they tend to be with the ILBW. It says a lot about the ILBW but it also says a lot about Sophie Trudeau.
The fact that she was married to the wokest man alive and destroyer of women's rights in Canada Justin Trudeau says it all about her
- Status