A lot of this just comes down to people treating royal biographies and gossip cycles as if they’re confirmed fact, when in reality they’re often a mix of anecdote, interpretation, and speculation.
It’s also a huge leap to take isolated stories about behaviour in school or early adulthood and turn that into a fixed assumption about how someone behaves in their marriage decades later.
What is it with some people who are so desperate to push the idea that William had an affair?
That rumour is from around 2019, and we are now 7 years further down the line, yet people are still going on about that internet rumour without any evidence. After those rumours, Catherine invited Rose and her husband to her birthday with close friends and family. Rose and her husband were even seen walking with Catherine’s parents—do people really think her parents would be walking with his alleged mistress? Catherine was also seen dining and socialising with Rose at her home after those rumours.
Rose has had lawyers involved to deny it, and Catherine’s very close sister named her daughter Rose—something she would hardly do if there was any truth to that rumour.
Just because people keep repeating it—and let’s be honest, it’s often fans of a certain couple or anti-monarchists—doesn’t mean there is any truth to it.
thanks for calling me a Meghan lover, I don’t actually like the woman but I do feel sorry for her based on the press coverage she received while here and directly after they left before setting up home. Now I just think she is a train wreck. Harry has and always will be a stupid brat who the palace protected but now no PR we are seeing the idiot in truth. However violence from the famous dog bowl incident should not been tolerated regardless of who it is.
i used the rose story as an example. I worked with children previously and remember my friends children’s behaviours. The child is often a smaller less able to get away with it version of an adult. This is my basis for both my feelings of the wales boys being brats (W&H).
I still think the upper class have a very loose ruling on extramarital affairs having known some from university and having read various biographies/articles with anecdotal accounts (trust them more than a palace PR article).
i could see Kate being told to play nice to squash a rumour and having seen articles saying she closed down her circle and keeps a very small group of friends, I could see her having lost some for toadying or trying to get at William.
the niece named rose I don‘t see as evidence as if you like the name you use it, if rose had broken the marriage/or been there forever like Camilla I totally see that However I see and here lots of baby name stories with the common consensus being you don’t own a name nowadays shows it wouldn’t matter.
I do feel that certain people on this thread don’t like a different point of view. Yes Kate is ill and some genuine concern about her weight is ok but if You question if the photo is posed and staged or say anything where you don’t go along with palace PR of them being so in love you get soundly told your rubbish and shouldn’t speak.
I came on here genuinely curious about what I was reading on another thread and asked if you all had an opinion any ideas only to be told I was a Sussex squad member and the devil for asking and anything I said to give context for why I thought it was genuine was shot down.
i think people need to remember your opinion is as valid as mine but don’t attack me. I haven’t called anyone’s post rubbish or told them to stop/you have no evidence/your being disrespectful etc.
can we have conversations without this or the thread title should be changed to William & Kate love only.
.
).