Glad we agree on thatThere's no excuse for calling a baby vile names, nor did I imply.
Peteykirch specifically referenced that the threads had PICTURES of Jackson.
I referenced if they never put the child's face anywhere (i.e. on camera), people would then have zero to work with. If they barely ever referenced him and kept the channel to "travel" as their website states, people would then have zero to work with.