my opinion they're directed at both and both are in the wrong. If a man is knowingly cheating with a married woman then yes he is in the wrong.Question - if I, as a woman in a relationship go out and sleep or have an affair with a single man, is that man my ‘enabler.’ Does the single man owe my fella decency and respect? Is he trash? Or is he just a man who wanted sex and that’s less horrifying then a women doing the same thing?
Just wondering if these views are directed at both genders or women only?
I view it as both genders. Its just a shitty thing to do, man or woman imoQuestion - if I, as a woman in a relationship go out and sleep or have an affair with a single man, is that man my ‘enabler.’ Does the single man owe my fella decency and respect? Is he trash? Or is he just a man who wanted sex and that’s less horrifying then a women doing the same thing?
Just wondering if these views are directed at both genders or women only?
If he has morals and knows of him, yes.Does the single man owe my fella decency and respect? Is he trash?
For me it applies to both ,but I think it's more accepting of a man to cheat . Take Hancock for instance both parties were married ,the public sympathy went to his wife and Ginas husband,he was seen as having his cake and eating it ( wink ,wink,nudge,nudge) and the scorn fell on his mistress ...she'll be forever labelled the 'other woman' .Question - if I, as a woman in a relationship go out and sleep or have an affair with a single man, is that man my ‘enabler.’ Does the single man owe my fella decency and respect? Is he trash? Or is he just a man who wanted sex and that’s less horrifying then a women doing the same thing?
Just wondering if these views are directed at both genders or women only?
Monica Lewinsky is a good example of that. Bill Clinton got nothing. People still bring up Monica Lewinksy now and the woman is nearly 50For me it applies to both ,but I think it's more accepting of a man to cheat . Take Hancock for instance both parties were married ,the public sympathy went to his wife and Ginas husband,he was seen as having his cake and eating it ( wink ,wink,nudge,nudge) and the scorn fell on his mistress ...she'll be forever labelled the 'other woman' .
Yip ! I don't think it ever leaves you .Monica Lewinsky is a good example of that. Bill Clinton got nothing. People still bring up Monica Lewinksy now and the woman is nearly 50
He’s absolutely trash if he knows you’re in a relationship or goes after a woman in a relationship.Question - if I, as a woman in a relationship go out and sleep or have an affair with a single man, is that man my ‘enabler.’ Does the single man owe my fella decency and respect? Is he trash? Or is he just a man who wanted sex and that’s less horrifying then a women doing the same thing?
Just wondering if these views are directed at both genders or women only?
I think so yeahQuestion - if I, as a woman in a relationship go out and sleep or have an affair with a single man, is that man my ‘enabler.’ Does the single man owe my fella decency and respect? Is he trash? Or is he just a man who wanted sex and that’s less horrifying then a women doing the same thing?
Just wondering if these views are directed at both genders or women only?
A lot of men will say that they do seem to suddenly become more attractive to other women once they're in a serious relationship. I think women do have this tendency to be quite competitive over what they see as the limited supply of decent men.I confronted the other woman and was basically told she wanted what I had. Not in the way that she set out to 'get me' as it were, more that she saw a man she felt was attractive and decent and led him on. He was the bigger twat though of course.
Not sure if this was directed at me or if you just happened to be the next post under mine, but when I was doing this (and we're talking like 15/20 years ago here), there were various reasons. I have really bad issues with attachment and insecurity and I constantly got fucked over and hurt by men I was genuinely in to, so it was almost like a protective thing where I could have fun without expecting it to go anywhere. And bizarre as it sounds, there was something quite flattering in thinking that someone was risking their relationships with their SOs and/or children just for a chance at fucking me. I know now (and knew then really, if I'm honest) that it wasn't about me at all, it was about men and the fact that they cannot run a brain and a dick on the amount of blood they have circulating (big thanks to Robin Williams for that one!).Out of interest ,what does it offer you being the other woman ?
not sure what you meanas in you had her as the other woman or she was your woman and was an “other woman” to someone else?
It takes two to TangoI've been the other woman. Not really fussed about judgement by strangers. We had a relationship for 2 and a half years. We both got what we wanted from it and it naturally ended. I was working full time, going to University and learning to fly so didn't have the time nor really want to commit to anything more than sex, worked for both of us. It wasn't me that stood in front of friends and family and take vows, it was him that did that and broke them (frequently)
I do see what you're saying, but then again doesn't this come down to what story the man has given? If a man has told the "other woman" that things at home aren't great, they're not sharing a bed, not having sex etc etc etc (whether it be true or not) then the other woman is likely to think that the relationship is over anyway. I don't think it's always as black and white as things seem and the married party could be manipulating the situation to make the other person think that what they're doing isn't going to cause much hurt..Of course it takes two to tango but what I find hard to believe is some people attached themselves to a married man because he gave them the confidence boost they needed after being treated badly in previous realationships ,yet they're happy to put those feelings of despair on to his wife ( should she ever find out ) why would you want to make someone else feel rubbish about themselves ,because let's face it he's disrespecting you both .
I'm more talking about the women that set out to catch the married man just for the buzz of it ,or course nobody knows what shite he could spill about his relationship with his wife that's why I said he's disrespecting both of them ( by playing both of them ) the old saying was once a man takes a mistress her spot is then vacant ready to filled by the next in line ,some women hang on to the fact they'll steal him away from his wife but I think it's more to do with the buzz and excitement he gets by his secret life not that he's trying to build the same life that's he's already bored of,because then the mistress just becomes the wife .I do see what you're saying, but then again doesn't this come down to what story the man has given? If a man has told the "other woman" that things at home aren't great, they're not sharing a bed, not having sex etc etc etc (whether it be true or not) then the other woman is likely to think that the relationship is over anyway. I don't think it's always as black and white as things seem and the married party could be manipulating the situation to make the other person think that what they're doing isn't going to cause much hurt..
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?