I bet he's advertising all sorts in different countries that we don't get to see - like viagra, toilet paper, incontinence pads, hemorroriod cream. it might not just be the money - he likes the attention[
He’s been popping up all over my feeds too. Weirdo.
guessing it’s ‘Begham’
...just saw him on a bus stop poster advertising Ali Express!..He looks terrible...those eyebrows!I bet he's advertising all sorts in different countries that we don't get to see - like viagra, toilet paper, incontinence pads, hemorroriod cream. it might not just be the money - he likes the attention
The Ali Express ad is on televised football quite a lot! Great gig financially but it feels very much at odds to see David advertising such cheap products when Victoria is so focussed on high-end....just saw him on a bus stop poster advertising Ali Express!..He looks terrible...those eyebrows!
I keep getting the crisps adDavid’s popping up in adds everywhere, it was the gambling one that got me.
Do people PAY for these honours? I can’t imagine Royals taking cash ? Unless it’s for his charity ?Beckham will get one eventually but yeah Charles does love a suitcase full of cash
I got the one for the coffee machine where everytime he makes a coffee and one of his sons (although you don't see them) keeps taking it and says 'thanks dad'.David’s popping up in adds everywhere, it was the gambling one that got me.
The fool didn't even know how to get it out of the container.Did anyone see David planting a rose on Victorias story?
Who gardens with no shoes on? Wtf
And argues that it’s not an English shrub rose surely it should be an English rose shrub. No you fucking melt shrub is the type of rose not the fact it is a shrub or bush.
Oh also. The end shot of the porn style back bend……..literally desperate
The royals don’t have any say in who gets an honour. All nominations go through the Honours Committee and I doubt they’re in a hurry to bestow a knighthood on him after he launched into an angry rant about missing out a few years ago, branding the committee a "bunch of c***s" and the honours system a "f**king joke". Whoops!Do people PAY for these honours? I can’t imagine Royals taking cash ? Unless it’s for his charity ?
These top two pictures are disgusting. David looks like he’s proudly displaying an incest fetish for his tween daughter to the world. Look how close their pelvises are in the middle image. Yet Harper’s face looks totally innocent and distracted like she has no clue this is inappropriate.Harper really looks a lot older than 12
View attachment 2970166
View attachment 2970167
View attachment 2970168
I know what you mean and that outfit might pass but but there are other photos of harper wearing what some might consider to be age inappropriate dresses, including one when she’s 11 and definitely still had a child’s form. It’s a bit presumptuous to decide what other posters are or aren’t ‘really offended by’. I maintain she’s too young for acrylic nails.These top two pictures are disgusting. David looks like he’s proudly displaying an incest fetish for his tween daughter to the world. Look how close their pelvises are in the middle image. Yet Harper’s face looks totally innocent and distracted like she has no clue this is inappropriate.
But Harper looks very average for nearly thirteen. Adults forget what is normal for tweens and teens.
I disagree with other posters who said her outfit is too old. Baggy jeans and fitted top is perfectly normal casual wear for little girls and women of any age. In fact the much younger girl to the right is wearing something very similar, only in a crop top version.
What those posters are really offended by is the fact that Harper now has an adult form, which they think a 12 year old shouldn’t have, and they are projecting their ignorant discomfort in her normal body by deciding her clothing must be wrong.
It’s bit like how two women, one big breasted and one small, can wear exactly the same normal, non-revealing top, and only the busty woman will be accused of dressing provocatively.
I am baffled as to how your mind even went to this place...These top two pictures are disgusting. David looks like he’s proudly displaying an incest fetish for his tween daughter to the world. Look how close their pelvises are in the middle image. Yet Harper’s face looks totally innocent and distracted like she has no clue this is inappropriate.
These top two pictures are disgusting. David looks like he’s proudly displaying an incest fetish for his tween daughter to the world. Look how close their pelvises are in the middle image. Yet Harper’s face looks totally innocent and distracted like she has no clue this is inappropriate.
But Harper looks very average for nearly thirteen. Adults forget what is normal for tweens and teens.
I disagree with other posters who said her outfit is too old. Baggy jeans and fitted top is perfectly normal casual wear for little girls and women of any age. In fact the much younger girl to the right is wearing something very similar, only in a crop top version.
What those posters are really offended by is the fact that Harper now has an adult form, which they think a 12 year old shouldn’t have, and they are projecting their ignorant discomfort in her normal body by deciding her clothing must be wrong.
It’s bit like how two women, one big breasted and one small, can wear exactly the same normal, non-revealing top, and only the busty woman will be accused of dressing provocatively.
I agree I’m not quite sure why one poster is psychoanalysing what other posters are and aren’t really offended by. Posts can probably just be taken at face value.You accuse David of incest and then accuse others of 'ignorant discomfort' in her displaying a 'normal body'. Have a look at yourself.
How could you possibly know this!?What those posters are really offended by is the fact that Harper now has an adult form, which they think a 12 year old shouldn’t have, and they are projecting their ignorant discomfort in her normal body by deciding her clothing must be wrong.
It’s bit like how two women, one big breasted and one small, can wear exactly the same normal, non-revealing top, and only the busty woman will be accused of dressing provocatively.
Am I the only one who literally sees a father hugging his daughter?!I find his tactile displays with Harper a bit odd….but….I’m not from a tactile family. We don’t hug and kiss each other (small children yes, but larger kids no) and my relationship with my dad was not tactile, my husband the same with his parents - so possibly that colours my view of the photos.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?