The earrings? I gasped too, because they're hideous
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Wow thanks so much for this
That green dress is awful on her. Too short (it cuts her off at a really unflattering point on her thighs) and too small (highlighting said thighs)
The school uniforms delivered free (tiny af on the side 
) really triggered me. I've to fork out the guts of 300 on uniforms for both mine and I'm sure I'm not alone. Also flat out on the beg for an air up bottle. Whatever about free makeup as she is a makeup reviewer (supposedly 
) but the free uniforms is a joke
) really triggered me. I've to fork out the guts of 300 on uniforms for both mine and I'm sure I'm not alone. Also flat out on the beg for an air up bottle. Whatever about free makeup as she is a makeup reviewer (supposedly ) but the free uniforms is a jokeNo the AF means that she gets money if you click on the link and you buy something. It would PR or Ad if she got for freeThe school uniforms delivered free (tiny af on the side
Probably not free if as AF means she gets a percentage of whatever is bought through her link, technically she’ll get something out of it but not the actual uniforms for free, she’d have to write gifted or something similar if they were freeThe school uniforms delivered free (tiny af on the side
God it’s awful that she’s making money from people buying school uniforms. Buying hers and then getting a kick back!!!
Yeah like whatever about getting commission on luxury items like makeup etc like fair enough, not necessities and not everyone will be interested- but most women that follow her will have uniforms to buy, not by choice. Pretty tasteless to attempt make money off people dressing their kids for school
Starting to work the kids into her posts I see, no faces does not mean you aren’t using your children.
She’s been doing that for a while now, while at the same time saying I don’t show the kids on here. Trying to come off holier than thou but still using them in ads and af posts.
I don't have a problem once they're happy and they're not identifiable and she saves their cut for them for their future.
I actually think she looks great
It’s more the fact she says she doesn’t show them. But aside from that, they are effectively working for online brands. For the benefit of those brands who are circumventing employment laws by using influencers’ kids. At least faces by Grace doesn’t pretend she’s doesn’t show the kids, Sinead does. It’s hypocritical of her.
But at the end of the day if you were in a shop and Sineads husband and kids were there, youd never know. Youd know Graces kids a mile away.
That only means they are not recognisable, she is still using them for content. There is more to the issue of using kids for content than whether or not a stranger would recognise them.
It’s obviously worth her while involving them in collabs but to always make a point that her kids were not part of her influencing to now showing headless versions of them is bizarre. Running with the hare and the hounds in my opinion.
I’m interested to hear which part of her look appeals to you?
Is it the grey roots? The dead horse hair extensions? The dated, heavy make up on repeat? Or the free polyester monstrosities that are always a size too small?
There are plenty of stylish women in the 40s on Instagram but Sinead is not one of them.
Each to his own. I thibk she looks great. I don't tear any ones look apart .
Someone sent in a question saying they were a size 18/20 and looking for clothes etc. She put up a picture of her in the born white dress and tagged them etc. That dress only goes up to a size 16 on their website. Things like this annoy me. If she had some sort of input she would know not to post that dress in particular as won't even fit the person who asked the question 
- Status