Sir Keir Starmer #3

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
A government with integrity, he said. The adults are back in the room, he said. He whipped his MP’s to vote against a national inquiry. Now, when it can’t be covered up anymore, this.
What a vile scumbag Keir Starmer is. At this point I’d go so far as to say that in one year he and his party have surpassed the Tories in the level of lies, hypocrisy, incompetence and mismanagement of our country’s affairs. I despise him.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Haha
Reactions: 30
A government with integrity, he said. The adults are back in the room, he said. He whipped his MP’s to vote against a national inquiry. Now, when it can’t be covered up anymore, this.
What a vile scumbag Keir Starmer is. At this point I’d go so far as to say that in one year he and his party have surpassed the Tories in the level of lies, hypocrisy, incompetence and mismanagement of our country’s affairs. I despise him.
I would like to think that Starmer will now apologise to feminists, activists (and the few brave MPs) who've been calling for a proper inquiry into the decades long industrialised grape of children in Britain. In January he said that people seeking justice for these children were “jumping on the bandwagon of the far right”.

it was a gob-smacking thing to say. Very far from being prime ministerial...or even human really.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Haha
Reactions: 24
I would like to think that Starmer will now apologise to feminists, activists (and the few brave MPs) who've been calling for a proper inquiry into the decades long industrialised grape of children in Britain. In January he said that people seeking justice for these children were “jumping on the bandwagon of the far right”.

it was a gob-smacking thing to say. Very far from being prime ministerial...or even human really.
Of course he will.

He is legendary for his forthright and humble honesty and readiness to admit if he has made an error.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 15
This is the first I've heard of this - knowing the number of mistakes that the tax and benefits offices make I think this is a very worrying piece of legislation.

And it still won't stop the biggest "fraudsters" - wealthy people who find ways around paying tax.

I'm putting it here because I don't know where else it could go.

 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Of course he will.

He is legendary for his forthright and humble honesty and readiness to admit if he has made an error.
He's got 2 rather embarrassing things coming down the pipe hasn't he.

Firstly, the trial of the boys on Grindr er, er, sorry I mean the PLUMBERS AND BRICKIES who allegedly set fire to his house.

And then the enquiry into the decades long, mass industrialised grape of vulnerable children, which happened partly under his nose as chief prosecutor, and wholly under the nose of Labour dominated councils.

I can't think of any other sitting PM who'd voluntarily set himself up for 2 such horrendously reputationally catastrophic events.

It's almost as though our Sainted Son of the Toolmaker thinks he might not be in power for much longer....
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11
Look at the eyes. They absolutely everything about him. Small, mealymouthed, self serving, weak.
The eyes of an absolute tw*t

IMG_5003.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 13
Something that irks me is I don't remember him wearing glasses very often, if at all, before he became PM. His team must have told him to switch from contact lenses because glasses would make people think he's intelligent and trustworthy.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 12
Look at the eyes. They absolutely everything about him. Small, mealymouthed, self serving, weak.
The eyes of an absolute tw*t

View attachment 3610294
Oh I don't know credit where credit's due, he did at least have the balls to call a statutory inquiry.

Or possibly he felt himself backed into a corner - I think it's telling that he announced it BEFORE Casey's report was published. He was definitely trying to get ahead of something. No doubt the Home Office civil servants warning him that no one wants a repeat of last summer's riots.

It's interesting to see all the media platforms and commentators finding themselves on the wrong side of history and trying to perform screeching u-turns. The Guardian is STILL trying to pretend it's a culture war thing - morally vile.

You know how we look back at history from 50 or 100 years ago and go "I can't BELIEVE people did / thought / said / wore that only 50 years ago!"

Well I reckon in 50 years time people will be looking back at us and going "I can't BELIEVE they thought it was OK to cover up decades of mass sexual torture and abuse because people thought it was preferable to deny children justice than possibly face social unrest!"

Like, we in current year are so not going to be the good guys when this period of British history eventually comes to be written.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14
Something that irks me is I don't remember him wearing glasses very often, if at all, before he became PM. His team must have told him to switch from contact lenses because glasses would make people think he's intelligent and trustworthy.
Looks like penfold now 🤣
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 8
Something that irks me is I don't remember him wearing glasses very often, if at all, before he became PM. His team must have told him to switch from contact lenses because glasses would make people think he's intelligent and trustworthy.
he probably just aged, lots of us need glasses in our mid forties.

i also dont know why people are criticising him for having a statutory inquiry - isn't that what you want? The last govt didnt do it 🤷‍♂️
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
he probably just aged, lots of us need glasses in our mid forties.

i also dont know why people are criticising him for having a statutory inquiry - isn't that what you want? The last govt didnt do it 🤷‍♂️
It’s the fact that he insisted it wasn’t necessary, called people who wanted one “the far right” and whipped his MP’s to vote against one. Now the Casey report puts him in a position where he can’t ignore it any longer although he certainly would if he could.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 23
Mr flip flop flopping along as per usual - What a bellend.

Mind you what do we expect from this clown, ya'know the one that needed a court to confirm what a woman is.

tick tock your time is coming starmerbot, regardless of how many super injuctions you put out there or how much valium you're taking...tick tock
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 12
Massive concessions have been made to his crap bill and now we are going to have to pay for it with tax rises
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 3
He is a soulless creep. His eyes show No Human Involvement.
This comment is bang on in the light of the ABSOLUTE SCENES in the Commons yesterday.

You have to have extraordinarily poor political (and human) acumen to laughingly congratulate yourself over the tiny, flimsy achievements of your failing Govt, and reminisce fondly about your fave footabller, while your Chancellor is in tears behind you. At one point Reeves had to lean over to help Starmer prepare an answer and her tears DRIPPED onto the document they were both looking at - he couldn't miss it. Everyone was ignoring it - awful! Thank goddess Kemi was brave enough to say what everyone else was thinking. And then....Starmer refused to back his Chancellor!!!

I've seen some emotional scenes in the Commons over my obsessive love of PMQs over the decades. During the darkest days of the godawful Brexit debate, May was visibly struggling at times and one evening (that bitter all night debate, remember?) looked to be on the verge of tears. But frontbenchers were leaning over to give her shoulder a reassuring squeeze, even the anti-Brexit Tories were supporting her. Whereas the Labour frontbench? They totally ignored Reeves! Rayner was...GRINNING!*

Not that I've any sympathy for Reeves mind you. She's the CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER. If you know you're too upset to make it through PMQs, DON'T GO, because if you sit there in tears you should KNOW that the bond market's gonna fall out of bed. Which it promptly did, making my forthcoming trip abroad to see family more expensive, and more to the point, sending our bond yields spiralling and plunging us all further into the slow motion bond crisis we've been spinning into since last October (I mean, at least the imbecile Truss had the decency to make her duck-up quick eh).

The mealy-mouthed 'personal matter' bull was disgusting and really just shows how little idea Starmer has about human support and human dignity. It's so misogyny-adjacent..."Oh GOD, Rachel from Accounts is crying AGAIN." "I know Dave. Silly emotional women eh? Probably all upset over some personal matter. Maybe she's on her monthlies, heh heh heh."

I beginning to think Starmer doesn't like women very much.

*Decades ago I used to move in heavily communist circles and was a member of the SWP - don't worry, I've reformed now! But I did notice how many men on the far left have a severe lack of empathy, and never feel themselves obligated to reach out a helping hand to friends or family who're struggling. I think it's linked to their ideology, they think it's the job of the state to provide help, thus absolving themselves of all basic reciprocal societal duties. They can spend that time instead getting all riled up about vast groups of people they don't know, in countries far away, who are being 'oppressed'. Whereas Tories and centrists, I think because they don't like Big State intervention, and believe charity begins at home, are more likely to go all out to help struggling people in their immediate circle and local community. I've seen this dichotomy all my life. It's an interesting phenomenon. I'm sure someone's written a book about it. Thomas Sowell maybe. Sounds like the sort of thing he'd be interested in.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Sick
Reactions: 23
This comment is bang on in the light of the ABSOLUTE SCENES in the Commons yesterday.

You have to have extraordinarily poor political (and human) acumen to laughingly congratulate yourself over the tiny, flimsy achievements of your failing Govt, and reminisce fondly about your fave footabller, while your Chancellor is in tears behind you. At one point Reeves had to lean over to help Starmer prepare an answer and her tears DRIPPED onto the document they were both looking at - he couldn't miss it. Everyone was ignoring it - awful! Thank goddess Kemi was brave enough to say what everyone else was thinking. And then....Starmer refused to back his Chancellor!!!

I've seen some emotional scenes in the Commons over my obsessive love of PMQs over the decades. During the darkest days of the godawful Brexit debate, May was visibly struggling at times and one evening (that bitter all night debate, remember?) looked to be on the verge of tears. But frontbenchers were leaning over to give her shoulder a reassuring squeeze, even the anti-Brexit Tories were supporting her. Whereas the Labour frontbench? They totally ignored Reeves! Rayner was...GRINNING!*

Not that I've any sympathy for Reeves mind you. She's the CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER. If you know you're too upset to make it through PMQs, DON'T GO, because if you sit there in tears you should KNOW that the bond market's gonna fall out of bed. Which it promptly did, making my forthcoming trip abroad to see family more expensive, and more to the point, sending our bond yields spiralling and plunging us all further into the slow motion bond crisis we've been spinning into since last October (I mean, at least the imbecile Truss had the decency to make her duck-up quick eh).

The mealy-mouthed 'personal matter' bull was disgusting and really just shows how little idea Starmer has about human support and human dignity. It's so misogyny-adjacent..."Oh GOD, Rachel from Accounts is crying AGAIN." "I know Dave. Silly emotional women eh? Probably all upset over some personal matter. Maybe she's on her monthlies, heh heh heh."

I beginning to think Starmer doesn't like women very much.

*Decades ago I used to move in heavily communist circles and was a member of the SWP - don't worry, I've reformed now! But I did notice how many men on the far left have a severe lack of empathy, and never feel themselves obligated to reach out a helping hand to friends or family who're struggling. I think it's linked to their ideology, they think it's the job of the state to provide help, thus absolving themselves of all basic reciprocal societal duties. They can spend that time instead getting all riled up about vast groups of people they don't know, in countries far away, who are being 'oppressed'. Whereas Tories and centrists, I think because they don't like Big State intervention, and believe charity begins at home, are more likely to go all out to help struggling people in their immediate circle and local community. I've seen this dichotomy all my life. It's an interesting phenomenon. I'm sure someone's written a book about it. Thomas Sowell maybe. Sounds like the sort of thing he'd be interested in.
Thank you for this perceptive (and frankly bleeping terrifying!) account of the PMQ fiasco.

And as for this sentence Rayner was...GRINNING! Rayner is a shark. She doesn't give a damn about the country; she doesn't give a gamn about the poor and the vulnerable; she doesn't give a damn about her party or her colleagues. In fact, the worse they perform, the more she sees opportunities to tread on their corpses and get a rung further up the pole.

She's horrendous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 22
What a tit show. All that hubris “I’m very proud to be the country’s first FEMALE chancellor” and just a year later she’s crying in PMQ’s and looking at Starmer like he’s just dumped her. I don’t care what the reason for the tears is, if she wasn’t in a fit state to go to PMQ’s she should have excused herself. Zero judgement, zero credibility. It’s now official, this lot are worse than the Tories.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 15