”Against their will”
. That’s usually how prisons work you know? Which is what it is in all but name. These are the radicalised and dangerous wives of Islamic state fighters, an Islamic fascist terrorist organisation. And if you think this thread is racist you really really need to read up on what the ideology of ISIS was because it sure as hell wasn’t concerned about promoting diversity….
What did they work as? I thought they couldn’t even speak English? Which wife ( father is a polygamist) was the bread winner? Nothing racist about pointing out they didn’t identify as British it’s the reason her father returned to live a traditional life in his home country. Education is only a small part of upbringing it’s family traditions and beliefs shape a child.Oh come on!!! So they didn't eat egg and chipsshe was educated in a British school and her parents worked and paid taxes in Britain. So they were British.
Threads getting uncomfortably racist. I'm outtt
Javid said he came to the conclusion that he had to remove her citizenship because of what he read about her from intelligence documents. Why don’t they release some of those with the names etc redacted?
Yes. But it must be remembered that Shamima is a poor little brown girl who did what she did due to intolerable islamophobia. All she ever wanted was to collect her rightful jizya and enslave her white schoolmates. The fact that she was denied such basic Islamic rights drove her to such extreme actions.
No, I’m just surprised at the people fighting her corner as if it was all a silly mistake. Her case has been through all the top courts time & time again and they’ve said no and that should be the end of it.
It takes a certain type of person to find joy in beheadings, burning people alive and torture
Neither of the perpetrators of that crime had their citizenship revoked. Shamima has had a worse punishment imposed on her, without trial, and there is no evidence she did anything worse than join a terrorist group.
Given that the best they had was literal animal food I’m not sure whether that even matters
What the AF does this gobbledegook actually mean?If I remember right her argument was that she was expected to be part of the morality police or something along those lines. Doesn't make any of it right but given that it's a massive cult and she was miles and miles away from home with no real way to get out I'm hardly going to criticise her or any other women that may hold completely different views/the views may not have ever been representative of her actual views
In the video monga posted it reports the feelings of excitement in camp amongst the wife’s at the strong prospect of Isis return to power and with it their husbands. The wives are just as dangerous and I’ve always felt they are waiting for their husbands no matter what they claim.Just a reminder, if any was needed, of just who ISIS brides are, and the type of things they did.
Jennifer Wenisch: German IS woman faces tougher sentence for girl's death
Jennifer Wenisch's sentence for the death of a young Yazidi girl will be reviewed, Germany's top court rules.www.bbc.co.uk
“nine years for death of a child resulting from slavery”
Awfully shy isn’t she….
Because the law is an ass. And human rights law is a mangy ass with syphillis.
Anyone who believes she did nothing in Raqqa but bake bread buns and produce children for the Jihad needs to give their head a wobble. The danger being of course their brain might fall out of their nose like snot release If they wobble it to rigorously.
My guess is no as well. In fact my guess is that if history had worked out differently and ISIS had prevailed Shamima Begum would currently be sat behind a computer in Raqqa communicating via social media with young girls carrying out exactly the same recruitment procedures that her legal representatives are so desperate for us to believe happened to her. And her kids, had they survived would be about 10 and probably just about to enter their first tranche of training to be Jihadi Warriors.
