Sara Sharif case #2

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
It was always going to be someone with nothing to loose that got him so not surprised tbh - we await the next one!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18
I read that Jurors wept as he confessed to beating her repeatedly... I just have no words...
 
  • Sad
Reactions: 6
So....the MSM are asking for the judges involved in decisions about Sara be named.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Yeah I don’t think you can be responsible for something someone else does four years later, that’s not how it works.
unfortunately the little girl is gone now...and all THESE PEOPLE have failed her..... a long line of them..... sad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
unfortunately the little girl is gone now...and all THESE PEOPLE have failed her..... a long line of them..... sad.
Yes I know, still think a judge from 4 years ago is a long way from being responsible for a decision based on the evidence presented at the time. Have you seen the social work reports from 2019?
Or maybe kids should just go to care automatically to keep them away from parents. That would remove any risk and stop people publicly harassing judges and social workers for their decisions in previous years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
As they should be. They need to be held accountable for her horrendous death.
Oh God no.

If any of those involved knew that he would murder her in a brutal, torturous way and they still placed her with him then they would need to be named and held accountable.

Decisions were made based on Sara's best interests at the time with the evidence available at the time.

Hindsight is 20/20.

We cannot punish people for acting in good faith and someone else committing murder - that leads to witch hunts and doesn't improve anything.

Let Sara's legacy be a step towards reform and improvement. She has suffered unimaginable cruelty because of her father and his wife. There is nobody else (except relatives of those people; FM and BB's sister(s)) to blame.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15
I’m in 2 minds over this. I think people want the judges named so they can blame them, I sort of do even though it’s not right, but it wasn’t the judges that murdered Sara. I think naming them at this point in time will just mean a witch hunt. Far better to have the serious case review and to know what evidence was put before them, and the relevant authorities to maybe review their other outcomes so the public can be reassured they’re up to the job. It’s already been reported in the press that US was manipulative and threatening to the SW involved, definitely lessons to be learned there on how to deal with rum like that to get the real facts before the judge, and to empower SW against this type of behaviour.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
Oh God no.

If any of those involved knew that he would murder her in a brutal, torturous way and they still placed her with him then they would need to be named and held accountable.

Decisions were made based on Sara's best interests at the time with the evidence available at the time.

Hindsight is 20/20.

We cannot punish people for acting in good faith and someone else committing murder - that leads to witch hunts and doesn't improve anything.

Let Sara's legacy be a step towards reform and improvement. She has suffered unimaginable cruelty because of her father and his wife. There is nobody else (except relatives of those people; FM and BB's sister(s)) to blame.
The problem with the system is that Sara fell through the cracks and ultimately suffered for it. There were red flags pointed at her father, but yet they handed her back to him....there needs to be reviews and enquiries made and the system changed because these are vulnerable childen's lives at stake.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 8
I think BBs sister is more culpable than the judge or social workers. BBs sister knew the truth, the judges and social workers were lied to and they made the best decision they could at the time.

There does need to be improvements made and the judiciary need to listen to social workers more but these improvements need to be made without creating a witch hunt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
Maybe the judge can be named then US and BB can go round his house, tie him up and hit him with a cricket bat as punishment? so he understands why nobody now likes the decision he made in 2019?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2
If every Judge that had let something happen which had then led to death was named and persecuted, nobody would be a judge.

The judge had no idea he was going to murder Sara, US manipulated social services, his children, and everyone around him. It could have saved Sara’s life if he had made a different decision. Not definitely would, just could. Do we then go back across Sara and every murdered child’s life and persecute anybody whom, if they had made a different decision, could have saved her life? Where do we draw the line? The neighbours? Her teachers? That judge will live with it for the rest of their life - what would the media prefer, them hung drawn and quartered lol.

The media in this country is vile and to be honest, if they’re pushing and requesting something, it’s not often for a genuine reason. They just want a headline and blood. The judge either did the best they could with the information they had, or the inquiry will find there were mistakes made. It’s not up for the Sun or Daily Mail to do that for us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15
If every Judge that had let something happen which had then led to death was named and persecuted, nobody would be a judge.

The judge had no idea he was going to murder Sara, US manipulated social services, his children, and everyone around him. It could have saved Sara’s life if he had made a different decision. Not definitely would, just could. Do we then go back across Sara and every murdered child’s life and persecute anybody whom, if they had made a different decision, could have saved her life? Where do we draw the line? The neighbours? Her teachers? That judge will live with it for the rest of their life - what would the media prefer, them hung drawn and quartered lol.

The media in this country is vile and to be honest, if they’re pushing and requesting something, it’s not often for a genuine reason. They just want a headline and blood. The judge either did the best they could with the information they had, or the inquiry will find there were mistakes made. It’s not up for the Sun or Daily Mail to do that for us.
The media are led by their readers and you can see on this thread that people blame the judge.
If there was no appetite from the general public, they wouldn't pursue it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
The media are led by their readers and you can see on this thread that people blame the judge.
If there was no appetite from the general public, they wouldn't pursue it.
The media are led by Murdock et al, people blame the judge based on what the media have put out, and so the cycle continues… you can see that surely?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
The media are led by their readers and you can see on this thread that people blame the judge.
If there was no appetite from the general public, they wouldn't pursue it.
So mob rule is ok?
How many of the “general public” actively want this info? Did I miss a ballot?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5