Piff paff puff
VIP Member
Sadick khan looks like someone who scratches his ring piece then sniffs his fingers.
Come on, Gloria, you know that's not what he said. He's asking why 65% of STEM jobs are filled by people from one specific demographic (white men), and trying to level the field so more women and non-white people get some of those jobs. I don't see why that's racist, or indeed problematic in any way.How is it not racist to say there is no good reason why a demographic of people should be working in a certain industry?
He didn’t say that the white people who currently work in STEM should lose their jobs. Nor did he say that no white people should ever be hired in STEMHe said there is no good reason why white people should have jobs in science and engineering and that he is "fixing" it.
Racist. If you can't see that, then you are a racism denialist.
But 65% are white men, not white people, meaning women are also hugely underrepresentedOver 86% of the population in this country are white. If anything, 65% in science and engineering suggests an under representation of white people.
I Googled "Sadiq Khan racist tweet" and every result pertained to the racism he's encountered himself - tweets that call him a "muzzie t*rror*st," for example. I can't find anything at all where he says white people shouldn't have good jobs. So...well...there we are.No, it several months ago. You may find results for Sadiq Khan Racist I suppose? That would be great.
Khan playing the racist card to gain likes ignoring equality of opportunity along with the passage of time.He didn’t say that the white people who currently work in STEM should lose their jobs. Nor did he say that no white people should ever be hired in STEM
He said that the proportion of individuals working in the sector should reflect the population at large. That’s how percentages work.
So it's a racist and sexist Tweet.But 65% are white men, not white people, meaning women are also hugely underrepresented
My heart bleeds for the 21% not being represented.Over 86% of the population in this country are white. If anything, 65% in science and engineering suggests an under representation of white people.
But there is no good reason why 65% of any industry is made up of white men when they account for about 40% of the population.It’s the 'no good reason' bit
That's a racist comment. Maybe plenty of white men like working in Science?But there is no good reason why 65% of any industry is made up of white men when they account for about 40% of the population.
What cultural barriers are they? Since 2006 UCAS has tracked entry into university and whilst white applicants have increased but so have every other ethnic minority to the point that if you are white you are less likely to go to university than any other ethnic group. The Royal Society had recently highlighted the lack of black people in STEM especially at a senior level and right away people where out with their pitchforks and placards.What he's trying to fix is the cultural barriers that make a lot of non-white people give up on the idea of working in STEM industries before they even finish school because they feel the odds are against them. He wants to level the playing field. Why isn't that a good thing?
Here is the STATS here and I remember when munroe bergdorf the moronic racist was presented with them he went off in a tangent about mental health and history books.Having worked in universities he has missed out a key underrepresented demographic, white men from underprivileged backgrounds. They are often the biggest demographic that don't receive the same opportunities (and there are official stats to prove that)
There are subjects and industries that don't receive a variety of applications in terms of demographic. That's not for the want of trying, unis actively outreach to schools and colleges etc to try and encourage wider demographics (especially girls) to be interested in engineering and technology subjects. Race wise they are open to all, with some subjects receiving higher applications from perceived minority backgrounds.
I think its more to do with cultural backgrounds, current pop culture of what's seen as trendy, and socio economic issues that stop people applying for certain things. And as for the industries themselves, do graduates stay in the country or do the work abroad, something common especially in engineering.
As usual with twitter, it is completely devoid of context.
In the past 12 years, we have had male Prime Ministers, female Prime Ministers, white Prime Ministers, an Indian ancestral Prime Minister, a black Treasury Secretary. Seems like equal opportunities to me. But my friend's son who was told he can't work in management in the army because he is white would agree that the Equality Act doesn't protect him from the discrimination he sadly faces.Re the Equality Act, that doesn't translate to how the real world works. Do you really think that the moment that act was passed, equality issues were all solved?
How is it not racist to say there is no good reason why a demographic of people should be working in a certain industry?Where us the eye roll reaction emoji when you need it![]()