Definitely worth it100% off topic but I jumped through half her results video just to get a new profile picture.. I'm not sure if it was worth it
And even without Tattle, she still had several opportunities on her own to catch the error.I guess now we know she doesn’t read tattle given she didn’t realize she’d misspelled “debacle”
That and she'd be incapable of speaking coherent sentences or forming thoughts that weren't pure babbling nonsense with a thesaurus-worth of misused words she doesn't understand and can't pronounce tossed in to sound smart.There is not a University MA programme in the land that would turn their nose up at a 74 for a dissertation mark. Not even Oxbridge. Why would they?
The problem would inevitably arise in an interview scenario, where our protAGONIST would decry her grade as paltry and how her dissertation actually deserved a much higher mark. Instant red flag.
I wondered if she put that bit in to make it appear that she doesn’t read tattle.I guess now we know she doesn’t read tattle given she didn’t realize she’d misspelled “debacle”
And she's still beating that drum. What she saw as a low, disappointing grade wasn't enough to humble her in any way.If a 2:1 meets entry requirements (presumably providing the course isn't oversubscribed and you nail an interview) then why would her dissertation mark of 74 be remotely of concern? I think our amazing gossip_guy nailed it when he said she felt entitled to a 'publishable' mark. And therein lies the problem.
I think so too. It was an easy mistake to spot.But considering she pronounced it "tappackle" in this new video, which is unbelievably off-base and close to how she misspelt it, I totally believe that she thought she had it spelt correctly and in her head it wasn't a typo.
I wrote a few threads ago that she is likely to get into that Master's at Oxford that aligns exactly with her interests (MSt in English 1830-1914, https://www.ox.ac.uk/admissions/graduate/courses/mst-english-1830-1914), because they have a high acceptance rate. This programme gets 83 applications a year, and has 65 places for the 2022-23 academic year.There is not a University MA programme in the land that would turn their nose up at a 74 for a dissertation mark. Not even Oxbridge. Why would they?
The problem would inevitably arise in an interview scenario, where our protAGONIST would decry her grade as paltry and how her dissertation actually deserved a much higher mark. Instant red flag.
Oxford entry requirement for one of their postgraduate English programmes:
a first-class or strong upper second-class undergraduate degree with honours in English literature and/or English language, or exceptionally a related subject.
If a 2:1 meets entry requirements (presumably providing the course isn't oversubscribed and you nail an interview) then why would her dissertation mark of 74 be remotely of concern? I think our amazing gossip_guy nailed it when he said she felt entitled to a 'publishable' mark. And therein lies the problem.
Not I, but I’m glad someone has! Hopefully some of her followers who got lower marks realise that balance is important and hopefully do not feel like shit in comparison to Miss I-Should-Get-A-Publishable-Grade.
It's only a matter of time before she tries to make money off of that monstrosity she created for her children's literature module because she got an 80 and thinks it's publishableThe fact her lowest overall module grade was for a creative writing class doesn’t surprise me in the slightest.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?