AgreedNo, I think she had a drunk driver, wasnt wearing her seatbelt and was being chased by paps.
That’s a pretty blanket statement to proclaim that all people who think she was murdered have disassociation. There was enough doubt by officials to open an enquiry that went on for years with no definitive conclusion reached. There are still an equal amount of people who believe she was murdered as believe she wasn’t. The only thing that can be agreed on is she was foolish to not wear a seatbelt. As for Henri Paul’s status, it was never determined whether there was alcohol in his system as his blood specimens were contaminated with pathology experts saying the samples were clearly “cooked”. A red flag to conspiracy theorists. It depends what you’re reading and ones level of cynicism. We will never know 100%.No, I don't. This theory is created by people who loved the self proclaimed 'peoples princess' to the point of disassociation. The same people who can't see that she was perfectly capable of making terrible decisions and frequently did. Such as getting into a car with a driver who was over the legal alcohol limit and not wearing her seat belt.
Agreed
For some reason I cannot fathom some people have put Diana outside of human context and onto some platform of superior being, which is unfair to her and very unrealistic. If she were alive today I wonder if the adoring public would still love her quite so much? It is fact that Diana courted the media to 100% suit herself, conspiracy theorist never take that into account. She was a good woman with a good heart and it wasn't right that she was stripped of her HRH post divorce from Charles, she put in some 15 years of excellent service to the British public for and on behalf of the RF and was mother to the future king - she should have been allowed to keep it. (IMO)That’s a pretty blanket statement to proclaim that all people who think she was murdered have disassociation. There was enough doubt by officials to open an enquiry that went on for years with no definitive conclusion reached. There are still an equal amount of people who believe she was murdered as believe she wasn’t. The only thing that can be agreed on is she was foolish to not wear a seatbelt. As for Henri Paul’s status, it was never determined whether there was alcohol in his system as his blood specimens were contaminated with pathology experts saying the samples were clearly “cooked”. A red flag to conspiracy theorists. It depends what you’re reading and ones level of cynicism. We will never know 100%.
Because Diana was no longer part of her family. We do know that Diana made life tricky for herself within the RF and regardless of what we think about the queen, she is Charles' mother at the end of the day would almost certainly side with Charles. I would imagine to the queen thought it sad but as Diana was no longer part of the family then it was not for her to comment (actually how I would feel if the same thing happened to my own sons ex-wife)I don't believe the Queen had anything to do with it, i do believe however Prince Philip had something to do with the death of Diana.
Prince Charles wanted to marry Camilla and felt he couldn't do it while Diana was alive as Diana was hugely popular and Queen of everyones hearts and it would make it look bad for her and Royal family by Charles remarrying. Unfortunately Diana did die so there wouldn't be as much uproar Charles marrying again.
I would like to know why it took the Queen a long time to make a tribute about her ex daughter in law.
For some reason I cannot fathom some people have put Diana outside of human context and onto some platform of superior being, which is unfair to her and very unrealistic. If she were alive today I wonder if the adoring public would still love her quite so much? It is fact that Diana courted the media to 100% suit herself, conspiracy theorist never take that into account. She was a good woman with a good heart and it wasn't right that she was stripped of her HRH post divorce from Charles, she put in some 15 years of excellent service to the British public for and on behalf of the RF and was mother to the future king - she should have been allowed to keep it. (IMO)
However, she was human and had faults she made mistakes. Maybe now 23 years after her death her 'fans' could allow her to be human and consider the facts with a logical mind and not hearts full of emotion.
I’m leaving this thread. You’ve made your mind up. It’s old news. Not worth the effort and it just seems you’re on here for a fight. ByeFor some reason I cannot fathom some people have put Diana outside of human context and onto some platform of superior being, which is unfair to her and very unrealistic. If she were alive today I wonder if the adoring public would still love her quite so much? It is fact that Diana courted the media to 100% suit herself, conspiracy theorist never take that into account. She was a good woman with a good heart and it wasn't right that she was stripped of her HRH post divorce from Charles, she put in some 15 years of excellent service to the British public for and on behalf of the RF and was mother to the future king - she should have been allowed to keep it. (IMO)
However, she was human and had faults she made mistakes. Maybe now 23 years after her death her 'fans' could allow her to be human and consider the facts with a logical mind and not hearts full of emotion.
I so agree with you, although she could be very manipulative I think it was unfair and even cruel for her as a 19 year old virgin ( I think she probably was) to be picked as a wife to a Prince in his 30's who was having an affair with a married woman. You could see that she was totally besotted with Charles and how naïve she was, "what ever love is" was a very telling comment from him. I think the whole thing caused her to have mental health issues, she was the RF's brood mare while Charles bonked Camilla on the side, and they all knew it.For some reason I cannot fathom some people have put Diana outside of human context and onto some platform of superior being, which is unfair to her and very unrealistic. If she were alive today I wonder if the adoring public would still love her quite so much? It is fact that Diana courted the media to 100% suit herself, conspiracy theorist never take that into account. She was a good woman with a good heart and it wasn't right that she was stripped of her HRH post divorce from Charles, she put in some 15 years of excellent service to the British public for and on behalf of the RF and was mother to the future king - she should have been allowed to keep it. (IMO)
However, she was human and had faults she made mistakes. Maybe now 23 years after her death her 'fans' could allow her to be human and consider the facts with a logical mind and not hearts full of emotion.
I don't think she was pregnant. A week or two before she was killed she'd been away with a friend of hers (can't remember the lady's name) and her friend said afterwards that Diana had her period at the time.The week before she had told a friend she was about to drop a bombshell. I actually think she was pregnant. No way they would let the King have a Muslim half brother! I think Philip was involved.
They weren't getting engaged. That's a story Dodi's father put out! There was no engagement and her best friend said it was just a summer fling as Diana was still in love with her ex. It was Dodi's father that also put out the rumour Diana was pregnant when she died but her best friend said she had stayed with her a week before going on holiday with Dodi and that she had her period at the time.Yes. Possibly because she was about to announce her engagement to Dodi Al Fayed, a muslim man. I think the Royal Family couldnt get their heads around the fact the future King of England and head of the Church of England would have a Muslim stepfather. I love a conspiracy theory and there are loads around the driver working that night when he shouldn't have been and whether he was actually a plant so the "accident" would happen. They never found the other car either.
She already had mental health issues from childhood caused by her mother abandoning her. I don't think she was in love with Charles. She read romance books and was probably in love with the idea. Plus who dates someone their elder sister previously dated? I certainly wouldn't. They only saw each other 11 times from when they met to the wedding. It seems ridiculous but he had to marry a virgin so he wasn't going to find many of those around his own age bracket.I so agree with you, although she could be very manipulative I think it was unfair and even cruel for her as a 19 year old virgin ( I think she probably was) to be picked as a wife to a Prince in his 30's who was having an affair with a married woman. You could see that she was totally besotted with Charles and how naïve she was, "what ever love is" was a very telling comment from him. I think the whole thing caused her to have mental health issues, she was the RF's brood mare while Charles bonked Camilla on the side, and they all knew it.
From Mohamed Al-Fayed's wiki page!I don't believe the Queen had anything to do with it, i do believe however Prince Philip had something to do with the death of Diana.
Prince Charles wanted to marry Camilla and felt he couldn't do it while Diana was alive as Diana was hugely popular and Queen of everyones hearts and it would make it look bad for her and Royal family by Charles remarrying. Unfortunately Diana did die so there wouldn't be as much uproar Charles marrying again.
I would like to know why it took the Queen a long time to make a tribute about her ex daughter in law.
I used to work with somebody who married her ex boyfriend's brother. No just his brother, but his IDENTICAL TWIN!Plus who dates someone their elder sister previously dated? I certainly wouldn't.
Could have been implantation bleeding though.I don't think she was pregnant. A week or two before she was killed she'd been away with a friend of hers (can't remember the lady's name) and her friend said afterwards that Diana had her period at the time.
She was never going to marry Dodi. She was with him because she hoped/knew it would wind up the royal family because of who his dad was.Yes. Possibly because she was about to announce her engagement to Dodi Al Fayed, a muslim man. I think the Royal Family couldnt get their heads around the fact the future King of England and head of the Church of England would have a Muslim stepfather. I love a conspiracy theory and there are loads around the driver working that night when he shouldn't have been and whether he was actually a plant so the "accident" would happen. They never found the other car either.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?