I have just seen that PA thinks he may get his military titles back if he wins his case. Big if but I can’t see it being likely even if he does win.
Even if he wins this case his titles won’t mean anything to anyone. He’s already disgracedI have just seen that PA thinks he may get his military titles back if he wins his case. Big if but I can’t see it being likely even if he does win.
Nope, he's disliked and too much of his behaviour has come out even relatively small stuff about how rude he is to everyone being shared by household staff as well as consular and embassy staff. Charles and William won't want him back in the fold as Charles wants to cut down the number of active royals being paid for and William wants to preserve the monarchy for George onwards. Most other royal families have cut down to the main line only anyway.I have just seen that PA thinks he may get his military titles back if he wins his case. Big if but I can’t see it being likely even if he does win.
In reality though the modern monarchy have no real powers, there is no way they would go off script and all the pomp and ceremony is just to keep up tradition and bring the tourists in.I am the only one who thinks that the Queen should have abdicated ages ago?
95 is way to be too old to be head of state.
I feel for Prince Charles, too old to make proper changes?
Maybe - or maybe inertia will ensure they remain. I wouldn't want to bet either way on their future after the Queen.When the Queen does leave us I think support for the Royals will dip and if Charles goes off script and tries to influence things then it could spell the end of them.
I’ve always thought Charles should abdicate and let William be king after Elizabeth but he’s waited so long that I don’t think he will.I am the only one who thinks that the Queen should have abdicated ages ago?
95 is way to be too old to be head of state.
I feel for Prince Charles, too old to make proper changes?
Charles hasn't got what it takes to be king ,he's a headbin.I’ve always thought Charles should abdicate and let William be king after Elizabeth but he’s waited so long that I don’t think he will.
This is a myth. The Queen's Consent is required before any law can be passed which could affect her, her family or any of her properties. In effect this means any law. She is very far from being an ineffectual old lady but uses her power to protect her own interests.In reality though the modern monarchy have no real powers, there is no way they would go off script and all the pomp and ceremony is just to keep up tradition and bring the tourists in.
When the Queen does leave us I think support for the Royals will dip and if Charles goes off script and tries to influence things then it could spell the end of them.
The current system is all about the next in line acceding. You'd need a real shake-up in the system or some major crisis over a particular heir for the Crown to jump a generation.Charles hasn't got what it takes to be king ,he's a headbin.
It should pass to the younger royals .I don't think the public favour Charles much .
They may shake it up if Charles doesn’t bring in the money it is a business after all .The current system is all about the next in line acceding. You'd need a real shake-up in the system or some major crisis over a particular heir, for the Crown to jump a generation.
Who? The Queen?How any of them can abide being in the same castle, let alone the same room as this creep is beyond me.
Sorry, I meant Andrew!Who? The Queen?
What I don't understand is how so many well known and powerful people were linked to saville and Epstein. Are they all really into that kind of stuff? Are a higher proportion of politicians and celebrities into it than normal people? Am I just really naive to think that it's not that common for people to be into this? I'm just so revolted by it all that I can't even bear to think that every name mentioned in connection with either of those two is guilty of something.No one, absolutely no one gets into the inner circle without being vetted. All I see now is "how gullible Charles was deceived by Savile" is absolute BS. The whole family are rotten to the core
Take a dive into Lord Mountbatten secrets, then go from there.
Even Margaret Thatcher had Savile staying at Chequers. It was an open secret for years about Savile and his procuring of the young to the rich and powerful. My own puzzlement is why this all came out, was something going to happen so they jumped the gun and did some damage control ..
"poor dumb royals, politicians and the famous were taken in by this scum"
I think that’s why the RA finished himNo one, absolutely no one gets into the inner circle without being vetted. All I see now is "how gullible Charles was deceived by Savile" is absolute BS. The whole family are rotten to the core
Take a dive into Lord Mountbatten secrets, then go from there.
Even Margaret Thatcher had Savile staying at Chequers. It was an open secret for years about Savile and his procuring of the young to the rich and powerful. My own puzzlement is why this all came out, was something going to happen so they jumped the gun and did some damage control ..
"poor dumb royals, politicians and the famous were taken in by this scum"