That accounts for the arm break but not the other red flags surely. In a space of a few weeks, a bone break and a hospital report of possible non accidental bruising to the head should warrant a huge spotlight on that home regardless.I agree with what you've said. I just don't think social workers can ever be in a position to question a doctor.
I remember after the murder of Sarah Everard, the police commissioner said women should flag down a bus if they felt in danger from the police. As if a bus driver has authority over the police.
And this is what this is giving. Social workers should continue to take the opinions of doctors as well as their own gut instinct. If a doctor says is fine, I can see why a social worker would dismiss their instincts.
It’s looking at that broken arm in a non mobile baby and adding it to the full picture of him being miserable, bruised, even writing out ‘I questioned if something was wrong but decided no’ in the baby’s own record is unfathomable to me. What did that SW do with those niggling doubts? In education that’s what they’re called and you always act on them and I would have thought in social care that is even more vitally important. To me, if that was written, there should be a paper trail of concrete measures she took to come to that decision that nothing was wrong.
The arm on its own without that wider picture doesn’t scream get the baby out of there now but the multiple issues did imo. Even if it was just cos they appeared to be struggling and there was a perfectly good option in the foster carer whilst they found out what was happening or offered more support.
Unfortunately sometimes there’s just a perfect storm of errors. I know that nefarious people will always find a way to access and abuse the most vulnerable in society but that doesn’t feel like a good reason not to highlight mistakes and shortfalls. I’m not arguing with you by the way. I think we mostly agree. There are always so many what-ifs it can feel torturous really can’t it.