Oh wow at those old videos of his! I didn't follow him before this so had no idea he was a douchebag. Not surprising he's trying to milk it though...I also can't believe I agree with Keemstar for once.
Oh wow at those old videos of his! I didn't follow him before this so had no idea he was a douchebag. Not surprising he's trying to milk it though...I also can't believe I agree with Keemstar for once.
It worries me more that Isabelle isn't his, especially as she's the one who is mainly used with mouth open ect.I don’t think you are wrong to assume this at all ?
Couldn't agree more.I'm not tech savvy, and can't follow the technical language MattsWhatltils uses, however I have first hand knowledge of how paedophiles "get off" on innocent images of children, it happened to me as a child. My experience has made me very protective over my own children and other people's children.
The images MattsWhatltils highlighted were essentially of children just being children, that is what paedophiles get off on, probably more than overtly sexual images. What a hideous thought, you proudly post a lovely, cute photo or video of your child naively believing that the only people who will view it are decent human beings. It is almost unthinkable that some sick F**k will be masturbating whilst viewing it.
Youtube should certainly be held to account for this flaw in their system which makes it so simple for paedophiles to be shown images relevant to their "interest". However paedophiles are not a new phenomenon they have always existed. They work amongst us, we may even consider them as friends, they are all members of someone's family. Surely it is incumbent on parents to stop sharing their children's lives and images. Society should be outraged by paedophiles, but there is sufficient understanding now of how social media allows images to be shared indiscriminately........ so shouldn't parents wise up and stop sharing?
We are bombarded with information about safety online, so why are some parents so reckless?
What makes me incensed about instamums etc is the fact that so many of them post their children's images and private lives as a way of promoting their own issues or brand...........but at what cost to their children?
Are we getting to a point where a law needs to be passed to protect the child's right to privacy?
Will tell-all instamums and vlogging parents eventually face legal action from their own children whose rights they have violated?
What do you think?
You’ve said this on a few threads, do you have any evidence of this or do you just have a vendetta against someone?And when is the r family gonna wake up that there channel is used as a peados HQ... spanners all false ppl.. peados hide behind angry wank and use him to fire the gun of hate towards everybody... the peados protect him and the videos that they love.. Dave channel is a pweirdo heaven..
I don’t think you are wrong to assume this at all ?Maybe I'm wrong for saying this but we all know what he is like, maybe he has friends who are like him? Hence these sort of videos with the title ect?
I agree. Surely if his Twitter is locked there must be someone who has access to his tweets or who can get access if concerns are raised?If you have any hard evidence then provide it. But all I see is someone that’s pissed off (potentially with good reason) and out for revenge
I'm not a fan of Dave either but the only way to let him know is to contact him...nobody here can do anything about it and only he can protect his family?Nope I dont go to football games but my mates do and they get to know ppl... anyway I'm a hibs fan.. but i have jambo mates .. just like rangers and Celtic fans can be mates...
Email Dave you got to be joking... he's the flaming loony tune i cant stand him... but when it come to his family i do care... when groomers are using his channel and him its serious... take it of leave it... but muttley is a far right fascist sum bag in Scotland and i have alot of mates that can back this up..