Pedophilia ring on Youtube

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I figured I'd post this here. A Youtuber called MattsWhatItIs has discovered a pedophilia ring on Youtube, where people are getting through an algorithm and basically trading child porn in comments? He explains it more in the video but its very worrying, especially for a lot of these family vloggers. Its been mentioned before that a lot of their stuff gets added to these 'lists', but its also adding private/deleted videos to these lists and adding time stamps to them. ??
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 15
I'm not tech savvy, and can't follow the technical language MattsWhatltils uses, however I have first hand knowledge of how paedophiles "get off" on innocent images of children, it happened to me as a child. My experience has made me very protective over my own children and other people's children.

The images MattsWhatltils highlighted were essentially of children just being children, that is what paedophiles get off on, probably more than overtly sexual images. What a hideous thought, you proudly post a lovely, cute photo or video of your child naively believing that the only people who will view it are decent human beings. It is almost unthinkable that some sick F**k will be masturbating whilst viewing it.

Youtube should certainly be held to account for this flaw in their system which makes it so simple for paedophiles to be shown images relevant to their "interest". However paedophiles are not a new phenomenon they have always existed. They work amongst us, we may even consider them as friends, they are all members of someone's family. Surely it is incumbent on parents to stop sharing their children's lives and images. Society should be outraged by paedophiles, but there is sufficient understanding now of how social media allows images to be shared indiscriminately........ so shouldn't parents wise up and stop sharing?

We are bombarded with information about safety online, so why are some parents so reckless?

What makes me incensed about instamums etc is the fact that so many of them post their children's images and private lives as a way of promoting their own issues or brand...........but at what cost to their children?

Are we getting to a point where a law needs to be passed to protect the child's right to privacy?

Will tell-all instamums and vlogging parents eventually face legal action from their own children whose rights they have violated?

What do you think?
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 21
That is horrific and makes me feel sick. I honestly don't know how vloggers who film their children manage to sleep at night. It disgusts me that they think it is acceptable to put their children's childhood on the internet. I knew stuff like this went on but to see it in black & white strikes the fear of god into me. The parents definitely should face legal action imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15
Just watching CNN ......some big brands have pulled their YouTube ads after they saw MattsWhatltls video. Hopefully YouTube will now tighten up their system. Thumbs up to MattsWhatltls for highlighting this disgusting misuse, and to Tattle member Mayday for posting it here.

Sadly no matter what YouTube or other social media platforms do, paedophiles will still be able to view images on social media whilst parents continue to post them.

Addressing that problem starts with the parents. STOP posting images of your children for everyone and anyone to see, they may be being viewed by the worst of society.

Tattle member GPort summed up this madness in a recent post,. quote:
"If an 8 year old child said “hey Mum, here’s a picture of me in my uniform on my first day of term. Can I send it to 25 year old Sarah down the road, 60 year old Trevor in America and 25,000 other people that we don’t know?” No one would say yes! It sounds insane. But these women do it daily and with really personal images. I honestly just feel so bad for the children".

I've gently and politely highlighted concerns over photos posted on instagram, they don't even bother to reply and make their case, they just block. I've seen very polite comments made by others too, and their comments quickly disappear.

Has anyone else tried to approach the subject with an instamum?................did they take your comments on board or were you just blocked?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
I've gently and politely highlighted concerns over photos posted on instagram, they don't even bother to reply and make their case, they just block. I've seen very polite comments made by others too, and their comments quickly disappear
One small YouTuber reads here, and was ask police and worked in child protection area of the police force at one time. Of course tattle is all full of hate but you know people have questioned did she really do that role; although it's documented since she's always showing close up of her daughter's arse, has weird and wonderful titles for her videos such as wet and wild and even put talcum powder on her daughter's arse to highlight her farting! She obviously can't extrapolate.

Fairly new thread here but Sophie May Dixon has two daughters and was on the programme blinging up baby. On it she shares photos of bikinis she has for her young daughter/s. She states that she just thinks they are cute, nothing sexualised about them. It's not what the children wear who have a problem but those out there who have a problem regarding paedophiles. Clearly deluded...although doesn't come across the brightest spark around.

Am sure the attitudes of these people are they are making money and that's what matters. I really find it terrible to be honest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
The Sacconejoly's should take note as they've shown their kids nude, in the bath and running around in their underwear, it's disgusting and should not be allowed.

Jonathan was once warned by a fan that his children's images were on dodgy sites and he wasn't bothered by it, what sort of father doesn't feel alarmed at that? He was once asked in an interview what he'd do when his children were older and were upset at having their whole lives online, he said he'd deal with it then but will carry on as normal now. All Jonathan and Anna care about is the big bucks they earn for doing lazy adverts where they rarely make any effort, while using their kids to fill out their vlogs.

We have stronger child protection laws nowadays and it's so sad when these laws don't extend to Youtubers who sell their children's privacy for profit.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 14
It seems they all have their own agenda. ? It doesn't change my opinion, that the responsibility lies first and foremost with the parents who have the power to stop this by not putting their children out there as bait. It is sad to think twisted people live amongst us, but it is the reality.......and always has been. The internet has given paedophiles new access to what they desire, parents need to cut off the supply.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
And when is the r family gonna wake up that there channel is used as a peados HQ... spanners all false ppl.. peados hide behind angry wank and use him to fire the gun of hate towards everybody... the peados protect him and the videos that they love.. Dave channel is a pweirdo heaven..
 
I'm not tech savvy, and can't follow the technical language MattsWhatltils uses, however I have first hand knowledge of how paedophiles "get off" on innocent images of children, it happened to me as a child. My experience has made me very protective over my own children and other people's children.

The images MattsWhatltils highlighted were essentially of children just being children, that is what paedophiles get off on, probably more than overtly sexual images. What a hideous thought, you proudly post a lovely, cute photo or video of your child naively believing that the only people who will view it are decent human beings. It is almost unthinkable that some sick F**k will be masturbating whilst viewing it.

Youtube should certainly be held to account for this flaw in their system which makes it so simple for paedophiles to be shown images relevant to their "interest". However paedophiles are not a new phenomenon they have always existed. They work amongst us, we may even consider them as friends, they are all members of someone's family. Surely it is incumbent on parents to stop sharing their children's lives and images. Society should be outraged by paedophiles, but there is sufficient understanding now of how social media allows images to be shared indiscriminately........ so shouldn't parents wise up and stop sharing?

We are bombarded with information about safety online, so why are some parents so reckless?

What makes me incensed about instamums etc is the fact that so many of them post their children's images and private lives as a way of promoting their own issues or brand...........but at what cost to their children?

Are we getting to a point where a law needs to be passed to protect the child's right to privacy?

Will tell-all instamums and vlogging parents eventually face legal action from their own children whose rights they have violated?

What do you think?
Couldn't agree more.
 
And when is the r family gonna wake up that there channel is used as a peados HQ... spanners all false ppl.. peados hide behind angry wank and use him to fire the gun of hate towards everybody... the peados protect him and the videos that they love.. Dave channel is a pweirdo heaven..
You’ve said this on a few threads, do you have any evidence of this or do you just have a vendetta against someone?
 
I just want to let desent ppl know a well groomer from Scotland is on the prowel.. I hate angry wank... but i don't want his to be a victim and his family.. I do care about Dave and family dont get groomed.. take it or leave it its the truth..
 
People will listen if you have proof, you mentioned Mutt/kenny/2604Ghost. It’s obviously someone a bit strange but do they have any previous convictions?
 
I have no idea why YTers ever put their children on line to such a huge extent. I used to like Louise Pentland but got increasingly uncomfortable with seeing her children all the time. They just aren't in a position to give their consent. She won't put her partner on much to protect his privacy but not her children. Also Inghams, Wilkes Family, Saccone-Jolys. I think they are storing up no end of potential trouble & mental health issues with their offspring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
I have no idea why YTers ever put their children on line to such a huge extent. I used to like Louise Pentland but got increasingly uncomfortable with seeing her children all the time. They just aren't in a position to give their consent. She won't put her partner on much to protect his privacy but not her children. Also Inghams, Wilkes Family, Saccone-Jolys. I think they are storing up no end of potential trouble & mental health issues with their offspring.
I definitely agree, especially when these kids are filmed every little thing they do. Must be tough at school as kids can find the smallest thing to bully other kids and Wilkes’s daughter has definitely had issues directly linked to her Leasa vlogging their entire lives. And it’s not as if Wilkes makes more than pennies from vlogging it’s just a vanity thing for her
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Jessica Ballinger is upset on twitter that YouTube have targeted her videos. She says they should ban the commenters ect and not put the blame on her and her children which I can see her point but then she also must know there are peados out there and having a 5 year old in a leotard in nearly every video/thumbnail is going to make them targets for these peados.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
I have no idea why YTers ever put their children on line to such a huge extent. I used to like Louise Pentland but got increasingly uncomfortable with seeing her children all the time. They just aren't in a position to give their consent. She won't put her partner on much to protect his privacy but not her children. Also Inghams, Wilkes Family, Saccone-Jolys. I think they are storing up no end of potential trouble & mental health issues with their offspring.
I never even thought about that before but yeah its odd how she shares very little about/of Liam and her relationship, but is happy to film her kids so much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
AdBlock Detected

Please disable your adblocker to use tattle

I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks