One small YouTuber reads here, and was ask police and worked in child protection area of the police force at one time. Of course tattle is all full of hate but you know people have questioned did she really do that role; although it's documented since she's always showing close up of her daughter's arse, has weird and wonderful titles for her videos such as wet and wild and even put talcum powder on her daughter's arse to highlight her farting! She obviously can't extrapolate.I've gently and politely highlighted concerns over photos posted on instagram, they don't even bother to reply and make their case, they just block. I've seen very polite comments made by others too, and their comments quickly disappear
Oh wow at those old videos of his! I didn't follow him before this so had no idea he was a douchebag. Not surprising he's trying to milk it though...I also can't believe I agree with Keemstar for once.
Couldn't agree more.I'm not tech savvy, and can't follow the technical language MattsWhatltils uses, however I have first hand knowledge of how paedophiles "get off" on innocent images of children, it happened to me as a child. My experience has made me very protective over my own children and other people's children.
The images MattsWhatltils highlighted were essentially of children just being children, that is what paedophiles get off on, probably more than overtly sexual images. What a hideous thought, you proudly post a lovely, cute photo or video of your child naively believing that the only people who will view it are decent human beings. It is almost unthinkable that some sick F**k will be masturbating whilst viewing it.
Youtube should certainly be held to account for this flaw in their system which makes it so simple for paedophiles to be shown images relevant to their "interest". However paedophiles are not a new phenomenon they have always existed. They work amongst us, we may even consider them as friends, they are all members of someone's family. Surely it is incumbent on parents to stop sharing their children's lives and images. Society should be outraged by paedophiles, but there is sufficient understanding now of how social media allows images to be shared indiscriminately........ so shouldn't parents wise up and stop sharing?
We are bombarded with information about safety online, so why are some parents so reckless?
What makes me incensed about instamums etc is the fact that so many of them post their children's images and private lives as a way of promoting their own issues or brand...........but at what cost to their children?
Are we getting to a point where a law needs to be passed to protect the child's right to privacy?
Will tell-all instamums and vlogging parents eventually face legal action from their own children whose rights they have violated?
What do you think?
You’ve said this on a few threads, do you have any evidence of this or do you just have a vendetta against someone?And when is the r family gonna wake up that there channel is used as a peados HQ... spanners all false ppl.. peados hide behind angry wank and use him to fire the gun of hate towards everybody... the peados protect him and the videos that they love.. Dave channel is a pweirdo heaven..
I definitely agree, especially when these kids are filmed every little thing they do. Must be tough at school as kids can find the smallest thing to bully other kids and Wilkes’s daughter has definitely had issues directly linked to her Leasa vlogging their entire lives. And it’s not as if Wilkes makes more than pennies from vlogging it’s just a vanity thing for herI have no idea why YTers ever put their children on line to such a huge extent. I used to like Louise Pentland but got increasingly uncomfortable with seeing her children all the time. They just aren't in a position to give their consent. She won't put her partner on much to protect his privacy but not her children. Also Inghams, Wilkes Family, Saccone-Jolys. I think they are storing up no end of potential trouble & mental health issues with their offspring.
I never even thought about that before but yeah its odd how she shares very little about/of Liam and her relationship, but is happy to film her kids so much.I have no idea why YTers ever put their children on line to such a huge extent. I used to like Louise Pentland but got increasingly uncomfortable with seeing her children all the time. They just aren't in a position to give their consent. She won't put her partner on much to protect his privacy but not her children. Also Inghams, Wilkes Family, Saccone-Jolys. I think they are storing up no end of potential trouble & mental health issues with their offspring.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?