Yet you’ve just commented on people commenting?
( although I am wondering what I’m doing every time I read this thread, need to give my head a wobble and get off social media!).
Yet you’ve just commented on people commenting?What I don't get is why you're all so bothered?! Yes I agree people need to know where their monies going but as for everything else - I've got more important things going on in my life to comment on other people's (especially someone I only know via social media!)
I agree, if he has been able to leave the police force due to the change in lifestyle ie more money coming from advertising etc then it is relevant to the discussion. When working in that sort of arena it is important for the safety of yourself and your family not to publicise intimate details of your life online. Surely they can see how that is crazy. And saying that isn’t trolling!I know this thread is not going to be for everyone I get it but let’s not derail it cos important very important financial issues have been raised here that are directly affecting a charities income as well as funding someone’s lifestyle off the backs of others which is not ok no matter what the legality is around it.
The safeguarding issues are a whole other kettle of fish too. It’s not a case of oh we are being bitchy for the sake of it there’s very real world issues going on here
I agree, if he has been able to leave the police force due to the change in lifestyle ie more money coming from advertising etc then it is relevant to the discussion. When working in that sort of arena it is important for the safety of yourself and your family not to publicise intimate details of your life online. Surely they can see how that is crazy. And saying that isn’t trolling!
It is amazing how more recently the brand of PTWM has been more about herself and the lifestyle rather than ‘helping’ vulnerable people. Things are starting to be questioned..
He’s the law of wildlife and ramblers...
certainly is NOT helping out over traffic officers, fire Marshall’s and paramedics at an RTA.
Don’t quote me on this , but wasn’t there a time PTWM was crying into her stories / wrote a post about how hard it was for Josh , the work he does and how dangerous it is ? How he had just strolled home one day to the family home and carried on as normal but he had been out giving CPR to a man who had shot him self ? (Or something similar ) which I guess could happen out in the wild.....
@Elgato did confirm this, but is it something she should have been discussing outside of his work on a social media page? In the way she did ?http://www.southhams-today.co.uk/article.cfm?id=110620&headline=Gunshot death was suicide, says coroner§ionIs=news&searchyear=2017
Everything always seems to be about Rachaele & I think it’s massively overstepping professional boundaries to be discussing details of her policeman husbands work they way she did to the point that individuals could be identified.That did happen there’s a news article on it but it was disrespectful of her to post it to her followers cos the man had sadly killed him self and it wasn’t her grief to have
The reality is she is out of her depth. You can’t be a one woman crusade it’s too big an issue. Many websites supporting victims of DV have safeguards on their websites ie they don’t show up in browsing history etc to protect victims. She doesn’t have that sort of thing. I don’t doubt she’s helped some people but not as much as she makes out.An absolutely huge issue for me aside from the donations is the total lack of signposting to qualified DA agencies.
There have been numerous posts on there , stating that people have contacted and had no reply from Facebook and email. Just a generated message. That message doesn’t contain a sign post to any agencies (women’s aid / Samaritans / 999) in an emergency ?
Women / men are contacting and pinning all hopes on her helping getting no help and also not getting directed else where ? She doesn’t have a “highlight “ on her fb about what to do in an emergency or who to contact etc which would be a wise thing to do considering she is offering a service ; that evidently she can’t manage , for those people to contact to access help when she isn’t helping them ?
Everything is always about Rachaele, she even turned the Westminster Bridge terrorist act into a piece about her simply because she and Josh were in London that day.Everything always seems to be about Rachaele & I think it’s massively overstepping professional boundaries to be discussing details of her policeman husbands work they way she did to the point that individuals could be identified.
I don’t think she contacted her first, there was a newspaper article about it (a local one) featuring josh and what he’d done. She then shared it on her page and said woman got in touch with her (apparently)
That’s not true. My brother is a police officer and although most ‘specialise’ in one thing, they can literally be sent anywhere if they’re understaffed (which is almost always). They’ve all done the same training to get where they are (if you’re just a big standard PC I mean)
I think this thread is getting a bit much if I’m honest. Supposedly we’re only here because of her dishonesty with money/Paypal etc.
Gemma I think there’s just been that many inconsistencies in what she’s told her followers that people are skeptic about everything in her life down to what she’s said about her childhood stories of the people she’s supposedly rescued and people are just curious about Josh’s work- As another instagramer messiah pointed out yesterday big influencers are taking away people’s voice, because when you ask a question on their page that they don’t like your comment is deleted or your blocked & deleted- it’s frustrating, this site is where people can come together, discuss their frustrations concerns and I’ve not seen anything said about Josh’s work that’s out of order, people are just starting to question wether everything she’s been telling her followers these past few years is actually true...I don’t think she contacted her first, there was a newspaper article about it (a local one) featuring josh and what he’d done. She then shared it on her page and said woman got in touch with her (apparently)
That’s not true. My brother is a police officer and although most ‘specialise’ in one thing, they can literally be sent anywhere if they’re understaffed (which is almost always). They’ve all done the same training to get where they are (if you’re just a big standard PC I mean)
I think this thread is getting a bit much if I’m honest. Supposedly we’re only here because of her dishonesty with money/Paypal etc.
My daughters father was in an RTA in 2017, not at any point did a passerby phone his family to tell them, infact they didnt get a phone call, 2 officers turned up at their clubhouse where his parents were and they were told to their faces of his accident. So it's highly unlikely that she made any phonecalls. If she did, then I'd me seriously questioning why she was allowed to do so...I didn't really understand her comment with regards to the call, was she "claiming" to call the drivers family or the casualties family? Theres no way it would be the latter, i think most people know that wouldn't happen that job is down to specialist liason and would not be done over the phone. Ever.
However if they had taken the driver of the vehicle involved into their car during this time there is a possibility he or her on the drivers behalf rang someone to say hes been involved in an accident, shock does wierd things to people he could have rang his wife and said "I've just killed someone" however i find it unlikely you as a passerby say that " Hi im just sat with uour husband, he's been involved in accident and killed someone, but your husband is ok "?
However that contradicts the rest of the story that she was with the casualty throughout.
I think the event happened however the finer details are massively embellished.
They most likely were on scene at an RTA, Josh as a PC will have some first aid training and likely he would of attended the casualty, bear in mind most of the police only actually have quite basic first aid training despite their role her involvement would likely of gone no further than offering tlc to the driver until he was questioned by the police. She may or may not have been witness to the procedures that followed.
As the saying goes don't let the truth get in the way of a good story.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?