I’ve always been a bit confused by Josh’s role in all of this. I know in relation to her past when he wasn’t there he wouldn’t know exactly what was true and what was heavily embellished and exaggerated, but surely in relation to this article he would know it was bollocks. It makes him look laughable too. Why on earth doesn’t he say to her??Going back to the RTA.
He is an officer of Wildlife. Literally of birds and ramblers... so not only did her version never happen, but he, a bird policeman, definitely did not help on an RTA. like CATEGORICALLY DID NOT happen.
I wonder why she’s recently referred to him Working night shift and having 4 days off? He does seem to spend a lot of time at the gym and promoting some fitness food meal plan thing on his Insta - maybe he works for them nowNew poster!
Had a quick read through sceptical about a few things.
One thing I think I can say is josh left policing at some point last year. He changed his social media’s and if you go onto the Devon and Cornwall police page and go onto Brixham (the area he was under and was posted on google as being a pc) he isn’t mentioned at all. I vaguely remember comments being made at the end of last year about him not working as much and helping and home then work seemed to off phrased out completley
Welcome!New poster!
Had a quick read through sceptical about a few things.
One thing I think I can say is josh left policing at some point last year. He changed his social media’s and if you go onto the Devon and Cornwall police page and go onto Brixham (the area he was under and was posted on google as being a pc) he isn’t mentioned at all. I vaguely remember comments being made at the end of last year about him not working as much and helping and home then work seemed to off phrased out completley
I’ve always been a bit confused by Josh’s role in all of this. I know in relation to her past when he wasn’t there he wouldn’t know exactly what was true and what was heavily embellished and exaggerated, but surely in relation to this article he would know it was bollocks. It makes him look laughable too. Why on earth doesn’t he say to her??
I’m sure i’ve seen PTWM write that her PC husband stopped a woman jumping from a bridge whilst he was at work and the woman contacted PTWM on her Facebook page to thank PC Josh and her & PTWM exchanged lots of email and became friends. Now, if all that did happen surely it would be inappropriate for PTWM to do that. A policeman stops a member of the public from committing suicide, which unfortunately happens too often, but that policeman’s wife has numerous email contact with that person and becomes friends with them. I don’t know if Josh’s bosses would’ve approved of that - it just seems a bit overstepping the mark or something.
Rachel has said in the past, that she was friends with Joshs sister first, and that she always fancied josh. Wonder what he does for a job now thenI’ve always been a bit confused by Josh’s role in all of this. I know in relation to her past when he wasn’t there he wouldn’t know exactly what was true and what was heavily embellished and exaggerated, but surely in relation to this article he would know it was bollocks. It makes him look laughable too. Why on earth doesn’t he say to her??
I’m sure i’ve seen PTWM write that her PC husband stopped a woman jumping from a bridge whilst he was at work and the woman contacted PTWM on her Facebook page to thank PC Josh and her & PTWM exchanged lots of email and became friends. Now, if all that did happen surely it would be inappropriate for PTWM to do that. A policeman stops a member of the public from committing suicide, which unfortunately happens too often, but that policeman’s wife has numerous email contact with that person and becomes friends with them. I don’t know if Josh’s bosses would’ve approved of that - it just seems a bit overstepping the mark or something.
Probably! His sister is anyway as she helpsRachel has said in the past, that she was friends with Joshs sister first, and that she always fancied josh. Wonder what he does for a job now then. Is he on the payroll too
And he's boring as fuck, so yes - perfect for the job.It's a part time post apparently that fits alongside normal police duties according to the report attached.
To be fair, he's without doubt the best man for the job. You can't deny that he is obviousiy passionate about wildlife protection.
I don’t think she contacted her first, there was a newspaper article about it (a local one) featuring josh and what he’d done. She then shared it on her page and said woman got in touch with her (apparently)If it were a true story, she wouldn’t be allowed contact with her, and Josh wouldn’t have been allowed to keep contact details of this woman either, or pass them on etc. It’s just the biggest no no possible.
I mean the whole things smacks untrue again to me. And again saviour Rachael comes to the rescue in some way or another doesn’t she.
But if he hasn’t already left the force, the things she has written she/ him/ they have done is enough to warrant an investigation in to his conduct.
That’s not true. My brother is a police officer and although most ‘specialise’ in one thing, they can literally be sent anywhere if they’re understaffed (which is almost always). They’ve all done the same training to get where they are (if you’re just a big standard PC I mean)He’s the law of wildlife and ramblers...
certainly is NOT helping out over traffic officers, fire Marshall’s and paramedics at an RTA.
I agree, it's no differant to a regular pc moving into traffic division, he is a PC (or was) and it is a criminal offence to impersonate a police officer. He could not claim to be a PC for instance if he was a warden.I don’t think she contacted her first, there was a newspaper article about it (a local one) featuring josh and what he’d done. She then shared it on her page and said woman got in touch with her (apparently)
That’s not true. My brother is a police officer and although most ‘specialise’ in one thing, they can literally be sent anywhere if they’re understaffed (which is almost always). They’ve all done the same training to get where they are (if you’re just a big standard PC I mean)
That's really wrong. I stopped following PTWM quite a while ago so didn't see that. I don't know hold old Tallulah is but I assume quite young. It's sad everything is sold out this way, especially such sensitive issues.Hi and welcome. I too came over here expecting posts frothing at mouth full of bile. But I was pleasantly surprised at how much more intelligence and thoughtfulness there was compared to Rachel's Army.
Tallulahs therapy sessions have been bothering me for a while and I'm glad it isn't just me. Any therapist worth their salt would be appalled that the sensitive matters discussed and the art therapy produced would immediately be uploaded onto insta stories for the masses to gawk at.
Turns to trolling if it leaves here and heads to her inbox or grid. Look up the definition.I don’t think she contacted her first, there was a newspaper article about it (a local one) featuring josh and what he’d done. She then shared it on her page and said woman got in touch with her (apparently)
That’s not true. My brother is a police officer and although most ‘specialise’ in one thing, they can literally be sent anywhere if they’re understaffed (which is almost always). They’ve all done the same training to get where they are (if you’re just a big standard PC I mean)
I think this thread is getting a bit much if I’m honest. Supposedly we’re only here because of her dishonesty with money/Paypal etc. Delving into private lives of innocent people (anyone that isn’t her) and questioning people’s jobs doesn’t sit right with me. Turns to trolling when that happens
I agree about Josh still being a bone fide Police Officer but with a specialist role in Wildlife Protection. I agree that if first on scene at a RTA, either on or off duty, then he is duty bound to administer first aid etc. However what people are disputing here is that it is not the role of that officers wife to then personally telephone call the family. There was also no need to mention in her immediate post that she vomited and then to patronize her reading audience that they had better not contact the families of those involved out of respect to them. This is not trolling.I don’t think she contacted her first, there was a newspaper article about it (a local one) featuring josh and what he’d done. She then shared it on her page and said woman got in touch with her (apparently)
That’s not true. My brother is a police officer and although most ‘specialise’ in one thing, they can literally be sent anywhere if they’re understaffed (which is almost always). They’ve all done the same training to get where they are (if you’re just a big standard PC I mean)
I think this thread is getting a bit much if I’m honest. Supposedly we’re only here because of her dishonesty with money/Paypal etc. Delving into private lives of innocent people (anyone that isn’t her) and questioning people’s jobs doesn’t sit right with me. Turns to trolling when that happens
It is not trolling if it stays within this page, have a look up of the definition, sadly Rachel's definition is not the correct one!I don’t think she contacted her first, there was a newspaper article about it (a local one) featuring josh and what he’d done. She then shared it on her page and said woman got in touch with her (apparently)
That’s not true. My brother is a police officer and although most ‘specialise’ in one thing, they can literally be sent anywhere if they’re understaffed (which is almost always). They’ve all done the same training to get where they are (if you’re just a big standard PC I mean)
I think this thread is getting a bit much if I’m honest. Supposedly we’re only here because of her dishonesty with money/Paypal etc. Delving into private lives of innocent people (anyone that isn’t her) and questioning people’s jobs doesn’t sit right with me. Turns to trolling when that happens
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?