OnlyFans

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Work definitely can have a say. Depending on the job And your image then if your employer becomes aware of it, it can bring the company into disrepute.
Yes I can imagine if your headteacher had a page it could be quite difficult for them to carry on in the role!
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Does anyone else see loads of people claiming they're like, top 0.1% of OF? in their ig bio etc. I'm not so naive to believe that people always tell the truth online though
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
People claiming they are the top 0.1% on OF is like men claiming they have 8 inch willys: it's possible but statistically unlikely.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 4

shouldn’t they be labelling these articles as ads?
The pornography industry would rather these appear as genuine stories that promote the benefits of a career in porn to young people

The creators work with agents to get these viral stories to promote their accounts somebody that has done this is Bonnie Lockett imo her earning claims at the time she made them were lies / fiction

Bonnie sells this viral story service as part of her marketing and courses business

PRESS
$2,500
WHAT YOU GET:

1 x story in the press with a high liklihood of going viral
CONTACT US

VIRAL CONTENT IDEAS

CONTACT US FOR MORE DETAILS
TELL US YOUR CONTENT GOALS AND WE WILL CREATE ALL YOUR VIRAL CONTENT IDEAS AS A CUSTOM MONTHLY PACKAGE

WHAT YOU GET:

All social media
Onlyfans

 
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: 6
I know of an only fans creator who had an article where it states she had turned her life around with it


It fails to mention in the article that she had spent the previous number of years on adultwork raking it in and even won some AW awards!

Not sure if she got an incentive from OF for doing the article or not but it is definitely misleading as she makes out she pretty much started from scratch on OF when she didn't


Fair play to her as she has done well but she had a huge fan base from AW to take over to give her a head start yet this isn't mentioned at all in the article
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
I'm a broken record on this I know but taking that Hannah's example above, I put her name into google with no 'xxx' or 'porn' or anything else and the second result is a link to her pornhub page where it appears you can see everything she has to offer for free. So how is the money made, why are people paying additional cash to her on OF or other platforms when she has her own free profile of her videos on a massive porn site?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Her OF page probably offers exclusive content (pics/videos), direct/real time messaging with her, and maybe the option to request her to make a custom clip exactly as the purchaser wants it. PH is just videos I think, and they may be older videos (by a few weeks or months) than those on OF.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Ran competition to film content with a subscriber didn’t verify the persons age the male was 17


School safeguarding officers also revealed that children as young as 12 were using the site to contact other adult content creators and asking to meet up.


Google made 875,783 reports and Snap 512,522. The adult social network OnlyFans was represented on the list for the first time, with its owner, Fenix International, making 2,984 reports in 2021.

 
  • Sad
  • Sick
Reactions: 2
Interesting article on the BBC today.


From what I can see the advert is legal, however it does pose an interesting question, is there a line? I suppose legal is the bottom line for most people, but well Pornhub is legal, would you be OK with that on a billboard? Whatabout a company with a name something like HornySchoolgirls.com? Any content on a site like that will start with a disclaimer that all performers are over 21 and it’s consensual, so it’s technically legal, but the intent of a website like that is pretty clear.

Do we lift the ban on tobacco advertising? Tobacco is of course legal, but also harmful. What about if a loan company charging 200% interest put a great big billboard slap bang in the middle of a deprived area full of desperate people trying to access quick cash? Legal, yes? Arguably smart from a business perspective, but ethically questionable at best.

Food for thought.

But anyway a big win for the model, because this has broken through to other media and will possibly add another zero to her follower count. Job done from her perspective.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
It is a difficult issue. I very much agree the access to porn children have is very damaging and already negatively impacting society as a whole with warped views of sexual relationships and universal access to camera phones thrown in the mix. There is resistance to restricting access to that content online in a way that protects both children and user identity though. If someone has an unsual fetish it is not hard to see why they don't want their data compromised by such a system that could lead to blackmail/humiliation.

The main issue is that as a more connected society we have reached a crossover between the acceptance of sex work as work, and the changing of attitudes towards sex, but the prism of how the internet and porn presents sex is the issue. I think most adults who have matured (and have been lucky enough to experience it) acknowledge that sex is at it's best when it is with someone you have a deeper connection with, are in love with etc. Not that enjoyable sex can't be had without that, but porn pushes a specific vision, 99% of the time via the male gaze, that would actually be quite hollow as a particpant but is more visually appealing. For undeveloped minds this is confusing.

At a baseline of human behaviour though I don't think the behaviour of people regarding sex will mature across society. For example I know someone is having a relationship at their work under the radar and the amount of gossip and rumour flying now people have joined the dots is unreal, and that's just consensual sex between 2 adults in private. Doing porn is like doing reality tv, it's like being famous but you aren't rich.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 4
You have to have a credit card to get anywhere on Onlyfans, which automatically means users are reasonably validated as over 18. Performers get people to message them via Onlyfans or a similarly named site (also ends in fans but I won't name it) as reasonable proof that they are over 18, these two sites are held up as examples of pretty responsible sites overall.

Yes of course some kids will manage to put their parents' card details in but if the parents don't then go nuts when charges start appearing on their statement each month or the charges each time messages are sent via these sites, then to be honest all hope is lost anyway.

There is far far worse content openly accessible on ALL everyday sites including Twitter, Tiktok, Youtube, Snapchat and even Instagram if you start searching certain hashtags or find one adult account and then start looking up that account's followers etc, and none of that requires a credit card or any adult verification (Youtube requires to be logged in for certain videos but that's not difficult to achieve). Especially twitter, it's an utter cesspit. And that's before going anywhere near Pornhub or similar which are also openly viewable without any kind of account.

Anybody getting upset about Onlyfans is *incredibly* naiive about what's easily found on other sites.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Well if we as a society have indeed reached a point where sex work is considered a legitimate, lucrative, and acceptable career choice then I have often wondered why there is such a desire to sanitise it’s title, ie “sex work”, or “adult entertainment industry”. For example person 1.

”What do you do for a living?”
”I work in the Construction Industry”.
”Really what do you do exactly?”
”Well I put bricks in line, apply cement to create the structure of a building which people will go on to live in. For money.”
”Oh you‘re a bricklayer”.

Person 2

“What do you do for a living?”
”I work in the adult entertainment industry”.
”Of really! Wow what do you do?”
”I strip, masturbate and have sex on camera, often with strangers. For money”.
”Oh you’re a prostitute”.

Where will it end I say.

Person 3
”What do you for a living”?
”I work in the removal and redistribution industry”.
”Wow. Sounds interesting. What do yo do”?
”I informally enter premises, often when empty, and remove objects, which I then sell onwards in pubs and clubs, or via agents, at much reduced prices. For money.”
”Ah I see so you are actually a thieving bastard”.
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: 2
You have to have a credit card to get anywhere on Onlyfans, which automatically means users are reasonably validated as over 18. Performers get people to message them via Onlyfans or a similarly named site (also ends in fans but I won't name it) as reasonable proof that they are over 18, these two sites are held up as examples of pretty responsible sites overall.

Yes of course some kids will manage to put their parents' card details in but if the parents don't then go nuts when charges start appearing on their statement each month or the charges each time messages are sent via these sites, then to be honest all hope is lost anyway.

There is far far worse content openly accessible on ALL everyday sites including Twitter, Tiktok, Youtube, Snapchat and even Instagram if you start searching certain hashtags or find one adult account and then start looking up that account's followers etc, and none of that requires a credit card or any adult verification (Youtube requires to be logged in for certain videos but that's not difficult to achieve). Especially twitter, it's an utter cesspit. And that's before going anywhere near Pornhub or similar which are also openly viewable without any kind of account.

Anybody getting upset about Onlyfans is *incredibly* naiive about what's easily found on other sites.
Twitter is really, really bad for this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
You have to have a credit card to get anywhere on Onlyfans, which automatically means users are reasonably validated as over 18. Performers get people to message them via Onlyfans or a similarly named site (also ends in fans but I won't name it) as reasonable proof that they are over 18, these two sites are held up as examples of pretty responsible sites overall.

Yes of course some kids will manage to put their parents' card details in but if the parents don't then go nuts when charges start appearing on their statement each month or the charges each time messages are sent via these sites, then to be honest all hope is lost anyway.

There is far far worse content openly accessible on ALL everyday sites including Twitter, Tiktok, Youtube, Snapchat and even Instagram if you start searching certain hashtags or find one adult account and then start looking up that account's followers etc, and none of that requires a credit card or any adult verification (Youtube requires to be logged in for certain videos but that's not difficult to achieve). Especially twitter, it's an utter cesspit. And that's before going anywhere near Pornhub or similar which are also openly viewable without any kind of account.

Anybody getting upset about Onlyfans is *incredibly* naiive about what's easily found on other sites.
You're correct, I think it is more the mesaage for kids that are already being bombarded by an emerging tech sector that they be an influencer or play games as jobs that OnlyFans is a career now. A billboard in a high traffic area legitimises that. It probably is hard work shoving larger and larger objects into your anus and the resulting consequences of that in order to earn a crust but of all industries porn is the shiniest on the outside and murkiest behind the scenes.

That's not to say I am against porn by any stretch, but I think the game has changed a lot already and the consequences are more further reaching than ever before. When I was a teenager in a small town there were whispers about supposed VHS copies of porn films that existed somewhere with local people on them, but no-one ever saw them. If an impressionable young person decides they are going to be onlyfans next big thing and will start practicing now by peforming sex on camera, once it is shared it's out there forever, and the likelihood people they know will see it is increased massively compared to 20 years ago.

Also I will say for all it's paywall security as other threads on here have noted if you type in the person's name and onlyfans into google with safe search off it usually returns half their content.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
That's not to say I am against porn by any stretch
Do you or anybody else that supports it think pornography has benefited society and women in particular?

I know you said earlier it’s negatively effected society as a whole then later said you aren’t against it

I think the normalisation / promotion of sex work is damaging that’s why I don’t support it
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3
I don't think I actively support pornography I'd say it is more of a view that the genie is out of the bottle the same way social media and technology has moved so quickly. I think pornography will always exist (and arguably always has existed in some form or another) for all of human history, it is just that with the advent of photography it has become more exploitative.

I think it has negatively effected society as a whole due to the wide availability of more extreme content now. I think this is where things need to change to ensure that access to content is restricted across the board to ensure under 18s cannot view it at all, of course there will always be ways around it but as it stands it is laughably easy to access it for anyone.

Women in general have not benefitted from it, though there are standout exceptions to the rule. Even someone like Mia Khalifa who harnessed the power of going viral on more mainstream social media and has denounced the industry since leaving it has still harnessed her notoriety to have a media career off the back of it.

I do agree that the normalisation of sex work in the mainstream is a problem, as I said before it is confusing enough for young people now with so many misleading sources of information about what they can do for a career vs the realistic options open to them, or the reinforcement that desperate women should turn to porn to make extra money by tabloid puff pieces. There is a boxer who wears an onlyfans tshirt for her fight promo stuff and I don't agree with that either, I'm not comfortable with the message that sends to girls in sport.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
There is a boxer who wears an onlyfans tshirt for her fight promo stuff and I don't agree with that either, I'm not comfortable with the message that sends to girls in sport.
Onlyfans has sponsored fighters Ruiz and Chisora according to quick search

Pornhub have tried to sponsor a university football team years ago even trying to get into educational settings

Why should pornography be put into mainstream sports and why do the other advertisers / sporting bodies / platforms hosting not push back due to concerns with reputation management reasons at the very least?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3