NI Influencers #3

[HoneyBee29]

No but I agree with her, why are people posting pics of her baby on this?? I thought this was to discuss people who have over 10k on ig not for people to discuss an infant lol

As much as I don’t agree with people posting peoples kids on here either she’s not exactly trying to protect her own child’s privacy herself, which as a mum is your responsibility. Her public profile is on display for the whole world to see and she’s constantly posting photos and videos of her. It’s her social media and her choice at the end of the day but I’m a mum myself and all my social media profiles are private with only my friends/family as god knows who is on screenshoting photos of your kids.

 

[jammydodger76]

Laura Walk in Wardrobe

as far as I know it’s a new build warehouse up beside the industrial estate in BAnbridge…her interior looks class but like a shed from the outside

 

[newnew1234]

Laura Walk in Wardrobe

as far as I know it’s a new build warehouse up beside the industrial estate in BAnbridge…her interior looks class but like a shed from the outside

Wonder buy , thought it was extremely expensive for the quality
I’ve gotten better quality of shien

 

[cee-bee]

I see Andrea Mccarragher is off on one today about tattle, it’s simple, don’t put your whole life on public display if you don’t want people talking about you. Also find it hard to believe the £1000 diaper bag is genuine considering she’s selling second hand clothes on Vinted.. something doesn’t add up.

I don’t really know this woman, and I understand why she wouldn’t want her child to be commented on.

Except my understanding was, no one was commenting on her child? They were commenting on how the baby was being held. Her post is deliberately manipulative. You’d think everyone on tattle was criticising her baby because she posted a few photos.

Responsibility for her child lies with her. Responsibility to preserve her child’s privacy, starts and ends with her. Call people names on the internet all you want but the reality is, if you have a public and open profile with 20k followers… the moment you post your child, that photo is out there and beyond your control. Screenshots can be taken and shared online and offline. Details of said child can be shared.

it’s not the responsibility of people on the internet to preserve your child’s privacy and dignity; it’s yours. As it’s mother. It is the person wh posts videos and photos of their child, that violates its privacy.

if you love your baby, then respect its privacy. Don’t post pictures on a public account you use to promote your business and make money. If you must share photos online, then do so on an account that is private with a selected group of people following.

she’s offloading responsibility of the care of her child’s privacy to tattlers, instead of recognising the responsibility lies with no one else but her.

If she is so incensed at these photos being shared - why hasn’t she removed photos of her baby from her account? What benefit is there to keeping them up and sharing these pictures?

because it’s a way for these insta huns to get money and attention. Easier to point the finger at evil tattle trolls that take responsibility for the fact that you are prioritising your own income and preferences and need for online validity, over and above the privacy of your baby.

I don’t like commenting on babies and personally wouldn’t put screenshots of a baby up, but I cannot stand this attitude with instahuns shoving the blame and responsibility onto everyone and anything but themselves.

 

[AFlyOnYourWall]

I don’t really know this woman, and I understand why she wouldn’t want her child to be commented on.

Except my understanding was, no one was commenting on her child? They were commenting on how the baby was being held. Her post is deliberately manipulative. You’d think everyone on tattle was criticising her baby because she posted a few photos.

Responsibility for her child lies with her. Responsibility to preserve her child’s privacy, starts and ends with her. Call people names on the internet all you want but the reality is, if you have a public and open profile with 20k followers… the moment you post your child, that photo is out there and beyond your control. Screenshots can be taken and shared online and offline. Details of said child can be shared.

it’s not the responsibility of people on the internet to preserve your child’s privacy and dignity; it’s yours. As it’s mother. It is the person wh posts videos and photos of their child, that violates its privacy.

if you love your baby, then respect its privacy. Don’t post pictures on a public account you use to promote your business and make money. If you must share photos online, then do so on an account that is private with a selected group of people following.

she’s offloading responsibility of the care of her child’s privacy to tattlers, instead of recognising the responsibility lies with no one else but her.

If she is so incensed at these photos being shared - why hasn’t she removed photos of her baby from her account? What benefit is there to keeping them up and sharing these pictures?

because it’s a way for these insta huns to get money and attention. Easier to point the finger at evil tattle trolls that take responsibility for the fact that you are prioritising your own income and preferences and need for online validity, over and above the privacy of your baby.

I don’t like commenting on babies and personally wouldn’t put screenshots of a baby up, but I cannot stand this attitude with instahuns shoving the blame and responsibility onto everyone and anything but themselves.

Yes to all of this I couldn’t have put it better myself. I wish every ‘influencer’ would take note of this and stop using their children for views, likes and gain. Blossoming Birds is one of the worst in my opinion. Pimping them wee girls out on the gram and getting them to do ads that bring in money for her. She even posts them in swimming costumes for Christ sake There are some really unsavoury people lurking on the internet, and these insta huns hand them what they want on a plate. They don’t even need to go looking for it! Shame on the lot of them

 

[martha82]

Wonder buy , thought it was extremely expensive for the quality
I’ve gotten better quality of shien

I completely agree - I’ve bought a couple of things in their sale - both clothes & shoes (at 70% off)
And thought the quality was shocking.
However, I will give Laura 10/10 for instagram content & her selling ability. In my opinion she could sell snow to eskimos I think she makes the clothes look absolutely stunning, but unfortunately in reality they are cheap rubbish (the ones a got). I haven’t been to her shop in Banbridge for years.
I assume it’s Ali express and she is making an absolute bomb.

 

[jammydodger76]

Laura WIW

Great business woman but clothes are horrendous quality. I think over time they have got progressively worse- they were tip top years ago and it was a real
Treat to buy a piece from the shop. Wouldnt dream of purchasing now as can’t be bothered with the inevitable return

 

[dickyticker]

Asked a few of the Primark freebie crew if they donated any of their haul to charity. Rather than even respond they blocked me so I think that says a lot, entitled and shameless

 

[sueellen]

Laura WIW

Great business woman but clothes are horrendous quality. I think over time they have got progressively worse- they were tip top years ago and it was a real
Treat to buy a piece from the shop. Wouldnt dream of purchasing now as can’t be bothered with the inevitable return

Absolutely agree, £70 dress fabric worse than Shein and the worst returns process I have experienced in years!

 

[cee-bee]

Asked a few of the Primark freebie crew if they donated any of their haul to charity. Rather than even respond they blocked me so I think that says a lot, entitled and shameless

people who feel the need to go into “influencing” tend to be the sort with very fragile egos who need to be bolstered up with shallow validation from online strangers.

they are never going to be the type who can stand any sort of criticism, however mild. Asking if they donated to charity isn’t unkind or trolling or unreasonable, but it’s mildly confrontational and their sad, pathetic, fragile little egos just can’t cope with that.

they need to believe they are liked by everyone and they are the coolest, the bestest thing ever and totally deserving of freebies and attention. An individual with a healthy mindset can tolerate being disliked, likes themselves enough to be able with withstand criticism and know it isn’t a comment on their core being. They are content enough in themselves to not need shallow validation.

so in short, I’m not surprised they blocked you at all. It’s totally on brand for that type of person.

 

[hellolovelys]

Olivia Mc veigh

Her jewellery is £1.99 on Ali express
RIPOFF

 

[Duchesspink]

Olivia Mc veigh

Her jewellery is £1.99 on Ali express
RIPOFF

Does she ever declare ads?

 

[Retired52]

Dirty doll going to hospital appointment then she l b on live to tell us all ( only if u pay !)

I can't watch anymore since the contrived post with him shaving. He's actually more vulgar than her

 

[chunky1983]

Andy ampx up to no good!

 

[Dilly2022]

I don’t follow that girl at all but you’d think the fact she’s aware people are screenshotting photos of her baby and putting them on sites online would give her a major wake up call

In all fairness, I don’t think others should be putting pictures of her baby/anyone else’s baby on anywhere either. Or at least blank her face out. If a mother chooses to share it, grand. But I don’t think randoms online should be sharing it to extra places. Or any other kid for that matter. We don’t know what creeps are watching these sites either. It’s her choice and her risk to post it in the first place, but I don’t think anyone else should be contributing to it. Just my two p’s worth. I think sites like this should have something In place that means people blank out or don’t post them at all. Everyone’s crying out for child safety and calling them out for posting it, but then contributing to the spread of the photo’s by putting them on here too. I’ll probably get all worlds of backlash here for even saying this

 

[Et tu Brute?]

When any image or video is shared online publicly, it becomes public property. There’s absolutely no control over where that image or video will end up. Whilst I do think it’s hypocritical to ridicule someone over exposing their child on social media and then repost them on here, tattle should be the very least of their worries.

It’s a parents responsibly to protect their child as much as they possibly can. “Influencers” who expose their children on social media are absolutely complicit in their children’s safety and being offended by a repost on tattle is simply ludicrous and missing the point entirely.

Anyone else have déjà vu? 🫣

 

[qwertyuiu]

When any image or video is shared online publicly, it becomes public property. There’s absolutely no control over where that image or video will end up. Whilst I do think it’s hypocritical to ridicule someone over exposing their child on social media and then repost them on here, tattle should be the very least of their worries.

It’s a parents responsibly to protect their child as much as they possibly can. “Influencers” who expose their children on social media are absolutely complicit in their children’s safety and being offended by a repost on tattle is simply ludicrous and missing the point entirely.

Anyone else have déjà vu? 🫣

Absolutely agree, as the person originally posting it to the whole world, the parent has sole responsibility for protecting the child’s privacy, nobody else.

 

[MDC]

See Jenwood gifted another lunch at the Redcastle Hotel, why do they feel the need to give these greedy grabbing pains in the a free lunches and stays, they seem to be busy enough!! and that will put me of going near it ever again, absolutely disgusting

 

[AFlyOnYourWall]

My Copper Fox

anyone know what this dome craic is she keeps posting about, but won’t discuss in detail? Did her and hubby build some sort of B&B type thing as a side earner without getting planning permission?

 

[AFlyOnYourWall]

My Copper Fox

also can we talk about the fact that she puts a filter on her kids to make them look more ginger than they really are?! Like wtf is that about (fyi I have nothing against gingers, I just think it’s ridiculous that she tries to change the way the kids look lol)