I had to replay the section a few times thinking I’d misheard her. But she definitely implies that it’s based upon a conversation with her that he changed his strategy, doesn’t she?! It’s unbelievable.
I had to replay the section a few times thinking I’d misheard her. But she definitely implies that it’s based upon a conversation with her that he changed his strategy, doesn’t she?! It’s unbelievable.That’s what I thought!! Jesus, that woman is something else!!
Yikesfake tanning can be ageing is see!!
It doesn’t even look like herThat’s either a very old photo or drastically filtered/face tuned!!!!
As problematic as Nadine can be (speaking as ex beauty PR) am not sure she does filters etc. The photo was clearly photoshopped/or old as from a marketing point of view that looks better.It doesn’t even look like her
Her fault or not, it’s wrong!As problematic as Nadine can be (speaking as ex beauty PR) am not sure she does filters etc. The photo was clearly photoshopped/or old as from a marketing point of view that looks better.
Misleading? Yes! Nadines fault... am not convinced?
I understand that. Although if someone had photoshopped the life out of me and put me in whatever publication, I don’t think I’d be proudly showing it off on Instagram without at least acknowledging (perhaps with a little joke) the way I look in the picture. Otherwise it just perpetuates the line that photoshopping and filters are ok. Nadine herself made some comment in support of #nofilters the other week, but then she’s happy to share a clearly photoshopped image of herself without a second thought.As problematic as Nadine can be (speaking as ex beauty PR) am not sure she does filters etc. The photo was clearly photoshopped/or old as from a marketing point of view that looks better.
Misleading? Yes! Nadines fault... am not convinced?
I don’t know. Question is, should they be able to photoshop your image without your permission? Did she give them permission? I suppose the photo belongs to them so they do what they like with itShe's probably contracted to share the image on her socials so making jokes about filters wouldn't look good. I think it's quite sad, she looks great but they still chose to filter her.
Sorry, the Jo Good threads are quite long and fast moving! Maybe we should do a wiki. We are busy over there noting the non-stop instances of her being shady, attention-seeking, hypocritical, narcissistic, disingenuous, rude, slapdash and inaccurate in the pursuit of becoming a fashion, beauty and lifestyle vlogger for the older woman.I follow Jo and watched her for a while, I tried to get into the threads here but they're so long and fast moving. It was actually through Nadine that I discovered her. I did a little reading off tattle about JG and she had quite an interesting personal life.
Anyway I caught a little of Nadine and Ruth's live a day or two ago and had to switch off, they were talking about toilets and I was there for beauty, so nope.
I've been asking myself precisely that, I only check her stories when I see her mentioned here now.What is the point of NB?
That’s the only reason I looked, because this thread was revived, and I wish I hadn’t as my blood pressure immediately went up several points. It’s just idle curiosity on my part, and perhaps hope that she will be doing something good, but she never changes; same old smug expression, hair flicking, tired phrases and underhand selling tacticsI've been asking myself precisely that, I only check her stories when I see her mentioned here now.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?