rosemarina
VIP Member
Sounds like theyāve over-corrected a bit?
yes agreed, the only reason I stuck with it was because they moved so quickly, if they'd dragged it out I know I'd have lost interest.I'm so irritated because I'm hearing this more and more. These companies are arrogant and entitled in my opinion. I was trying to work out the interview process for this job I've applied for and it would be months because of the lengthy process. That's not on .
This is so insightful and interesting to read.I've been in the workforce for 30 years now and one day I'm going to write a book about the temp jobs I did back in the 90s and early 00s and the various bizarre interviews I've had over the years. One of the worst recruitment process experiences I ever had was for a local charity, it was so bad. A lot of employers fail to recognise that interviews are a two way process - it's not just about the interviewee impressing them, it's about the company impressing you as well. Nowadays I have a list of 'deal breakers' which is short but immovable and I am much more confident about reading red flags and not pursuing something that I feel would not be a good fit for me. I've even offered feedback to companies on their interview/recruitment process on occasion.
The company I work for now are going down the lines of an increasingly laborious recruitment process and also decided not to disclose the salary at the point where people apply. I'm quite friendly with our HR manager and I've pointed out to him that some of the stuff they've put in place would put me off applying and I'm not sure I would actually get my job if I applied for it now given the level of ridiculous hoop jumping they want. He doesn't entirely disagree but says that they've had such trouble recruiting and made a few quite high level mistakes in the last year that they are trying to be more thorough. I get it for more high level roles that require a certain skill set and experience, but putting PA's and Customer Service people through 3 interviews and a literacy/numeracy test while not disclosing the salary is ridiculous. I wouldn't even agree to go for an interview unless they were prepared to tell me the salary range at least. Then they moan they are having trouble recruiting .
It's a shame as my company is pretty good to work for, but their recruitment processes don't inspire confidence at those initial stages.
I remember a few applications in the past asking you to put your current salary - and I bet most inflated their answer anyway, so what is the point in asking it - but I disagree with being asked what your expected salary is!Donāt agree with this approach at all. Sneaky! Itās like theyāre playing a game of āhow little can we get away with paying someoneā
Thanks for the update. Canāt say Iām surprised the interviewer said to you she was going to use your ideas. Like another poster remarked they were probably using a ārecruitment exerciseā as a means to do this.Thought I'd give an update.
The interview was intense and the interviewer was absolutely lovely to me which I suppose was a positive I ended up sharing loads of strategies of how I currently run things in my current company with the interviewer saying at least 3 or 4 times "oh wow that's a good idea, I'm going to use that myself" (which I was a bit fucked off at).
Got to salary and I said I needed to think about this due to the conversation (we'd just had about the set up of the role etc).
So apparently their talent team are going to email me the salary band for the role.
Haven't heard anything yet. I have an overwhelming gut feeling I'll never hear back.
I should be charging by the hour. I'll invoice them the bill.
I think itās odd and have come across something similar in the Civil Service where they use those ridiculous competency statements. Considering some jobs are going to be quite specialist, to me it seems daft that you wouldnāt want to assess someoneās actual work experience history to gauge whether they are going to fit the requirements for the work they do.I work for a public body and we had an email sent round saying that in future when we are looking for new staff that anyone reviewing the applications would not be able to see personal details. Well that's fair enough I thought, they want to eradicate any potential bias regarding sex ethnicity etc
It then went on to say that education would be removed as well as job experience! That sounds like a step too far. If you can't see the person's previous work experience and qualifications then how on earth are you selecting?
Given that ageism is rife and we're all expected to work until we drop these days having experience is the only advantage left to older candidates.
Does anyone else think this is odd? Or is it just me?
Does it have any relevance to the job you'd be doing?The way the company has set it up is....we don't disclose a salary, we don't want to know your salary but we will ask your salary expectations....sneaky.
I might as well go in with 100k.
Say it's for a job that's 25k then I'll be laughed at.
For this job interview in 2 days time...It's become apparent that the presentation I've got to do is a bit odd. They've asked for 4 things to be included in the presentation but the four things are like a riddle.....words put together.
It's not clear or concise which means I don't think they know what they're looking for.
I didn't think I was stupid but I'm doubting myself now.
I've shown my friend who is in recruitment and she thinks it looks odd. Like they haven't got a clue.
The charity sector seems particularly bad for this, totally ridiculous.Which sites are you looking on out of interest @Kittypops? Hope this doesnāt come across as me trying to teach you how to suck eggs but have you been looking on the Reed and Totaljobs sites? Only ask as from experience most ads on those only require you to upload a CV and sometimes a covering letter.
I try and shun applying for jobs with the employerās own application forms for the very reasons you describe.
I had that very same experience when I applied to do voluntary work. Rubbish charity too as it turned out and completely put me off working in the voluntary sector again.
Good luckYes. I have the experience and I tick all the boxes (well the ones they have given on the job description).
It's one of those jobs you apply for and think yep I suit this and could do it (rather than shit I'll apply and hope for the best).
It's for a director position....which I haven't been before.
Glassdoor give the director role for this company as 77k -109k
I can't really find a comparative role, it's an American company so this makes it harder to know and the 'director' part is a more American/Canadian thing ....my husband (Canadian) said north America is more liberal using the term......see how confusing it is
The role is for a global organisation....if that helps?! And according to Glassdoor they pay better than most competitors.
I need to figure it out as I need a number by Friday.
I'm thinking fuck it just pluck a number out of the air.....