Jelly Bean
VIP Member
I don't think I've seen this photo before. From 1995.
Her face was exquisite.
Her face was exquisite.
"Going feral"? Why should anyone be taking pictures of her sleeping that's disgusting.Does anyone know where the full clip of this?
No man would have her? What a vile misogynistic comment.No wonder Naomi Campbell is not married and had to have donor sperm.
No man would have her.
And I bet Kate did all she could do help Lottie. KM always seems supportive of women, I don't know why her sister would be any different. Maybe Lottie just wasn't up to the exacting modelling standards - if she was you can bet agencies would be desperate for Kate Moss's sister if she showed even the slightest potential.I mean, in some ways you might even feel a tiny bit sorry for Lottie- imagine trying to live up to your sister when that sister is Kate Moss. There's two options, you can either just accept your sister is one of the most iconic supermodels of all time or you can try to compete. Lottie chose the latter and let's face it, most people are going to be on a losing battle if they try to compete with Kate Moss
And not only did she try to compete, she actually felt that Kate should have given her a big break, that Kate owed her something. Instead of being happy for her big sister on her wedding day, her and her mother seemed to enjoy their (totally imaginary) theory that Lottie stole the limelight off the bride. The nerve and sense of entitlement is just off the scale!
The jealousy and spite is unreal
The only ones of the above that I thought were any good as models were one of the Richards girls (Theodora) and also Georgia May Jagger.It's been going on for a while, but it was never as bad as it is now.
Starting from about 2007 there were quite a few:
- Peaches Geldof
- Pixie Geldof
- Daisy Lowe
- Alice Dellal
- Leah Wood
- Mickey Sumner (Sting and Trudie Styler's daughter)
- (I guess before them, Jade Jagger and Keith Richards' daughters would have counted?)
Kate could have aged with wrinkles, jowls whatever and still looked fucking stunning. Because she is Kate Moss. Gifted with the most amazing face. Which would no doubt look amazing at every stage of life. As you say she is now a generic woman with work done. It is quite sad tbh as it would have been fascinating to see that lovely face age naturally.It's great if Kate feels good about the way she looks. But she becomes meaningless to the world when she no longer looks like Kate Moss, it's the one thing she had going for her. I feel it might have been better for her to age like Brigitte Bardot or Keith Richards and to just own her lifestyle and past. Now she just looks like some lady who had work done. Unrecognizable and uninteresting.
I don't see the appeal of her. I dislike Charlotte Tilbury also - both the founder and the products. I received some as a gift and certainly wouldn't buy her products myself.Looks like flaming Bella Hadid is the new face of Charlotte Tilbury. The girl is like herpes - you think it’s safe and then her mug pops up randomly.
Nope. It was based on looks and ability back in the day. More looks than anything else, really.Did they have this many nepo babies in modelling in previous years? It seems everyone who is the child of a celebrity is now a model.
Definitely a pretty girl, just not a model.I also think she’s gorgeous. She lacks that something that her mother has/ had but the way some are posting here you’d think she looked like the back end of a bus
Honestly I think being the offspring of famous parents must be a nightmare. Unless you’re as talented as them (which many aren’t), it would be awful living in the shadow of your famous parent or parentsI didn’t know that about him, that’s so sad. Could have had it all with that face, money, etc - it just goes to show that it can’t always make you happy (and there is my very not philosophical tale of the day!)
oh, Lottie![]()
I'm surprised Lila Moss is there.I'm surprised Kim K isn't there.