Looks like no! They win! Again.
there's not such thing a freedom of speech in the UK or EU. It's all false. People are being dragged out of their homes for NONE threatening posts on facebook or X and being tried in the smallest court rooms away from the media limelight. We live in a policed state, if your posts are too intrusive (where she lives, her husbands Linkedin) i would suggest taking it down until this boils over. Not tying to fear monger but just being honest. Unfortunately we aren't like the USA with their Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act we do have the 2023 Online Safety Act that can leak the actual names/IPs/email of the people on here.Nahh I think everyone is scared! Silly really - I mean there is outright bullying (and I do include online and in these types of sites) but there too is freedom of speech surely?
It’s a question of degree. And these things occur on many platforms - certainly not just on Tattle. If comments on SM posts are deleted by the creator as they simply don’t like like them, without any objective criticism of the writers intention or viewpoint, surely this in itself is wrong too? As wrong as targeted, malicious, intentional bullying - the manipulation and control of their images to the follower or viewer. There are also the lies, back to this post - and many others, in respect of breaking advertising rules and guidelines.
I certainly don’t agree with bullying but the case subject of the ruling was based on circumstances quite different to a bit of gossip and moaning about Instagrammers and their self entitled and annoying ways.
"It is called tattle something, j can't even remember"Lol girl give me a breakView attachment 3617317
The presumption that those who dare to disagree must be sad, lonely and disturbed is quite the ego flex!View attachment 3617736
Thanks for the concern Manon, but I'm actually a very happy person, I have a great life, a lovely family, strong real life social connections.
I also see through the influencer bull, and enjoy a laugh and tattle ticks those boxes.
We're not all sad, pathetic losers who sit at home 24/7 stuck on here, we just don't agree with everything you do and that is evidently very painful for you!
As you're clearly reading here Marion, keep your children off social media! Doesn't matter how much you (allegedly) don't give them screen time if you are exploiting them for moneyView attachment 3617736
Thanks for the concern Manon, but I'm actually a very happy person, I have a great life, a lovely family, strong real life social connections.
I also see through the influencer bull, and enjoy a laugh and tattle ticks those boxes.
We're not all sad, pathetic losers who sit at home 24/7 stuck on here, we just don't agree with everything you do and that is evidently very painful for you!
And nor even disagree, calling her (and so many others!) Out on not disclosing ads!The presumption that those who dare to disagree must be sad, lonely and disturbed is quite the ego flex!
The thoughtful and articulate discourse on many Tattle threads (admittedly not all!) speaks for itself. And it speaks out against the grifting exploitation perpetuated by instagrammers.
I don't understand how you can be so naive/clueless about the risks if your job is social media tbh. I think it's more willful ignoranceI wonder if Manon has been reading this thread because the latest Ocado story is super positive about British this and British that. It’s almost as if she’s taken on board the criticism that she spends all her time talking about how much better everything French is whilst choosing to live and bring her children up in LondonI guess at least she’s being self-reflective!
I posted a fairly long response to one of the comments on her sub stack post about sharing stuff about her kids on social media and she said she understood and agreed with me, but not sure she really gets how sinister stuff involving kids can get on the internet. She’s still sharing them online even after writing that substack article.
And actually it’s not just kids. The New Age of Sexism by Laura Bates lifts the lid on the total horrors of what AI can do, and if she read it I’m not sure she’d be in quite so much of a hurry to post photos or videos of herself half-naked or getting dressed, no matter how chic or sophistiquée her lingerie. Give the episode of Sara & Cariad’s Weirdo’s Book Club about the book a listen for the gist
I personally don’t mind her, and enjoy some of the recipes etc she posts (we have one of her books and use her crêpes recipe every Sunday morning), but don’t generally approve of influencers who aren’t fully transparent about gifts/ads/affiliations etc and hope maybe she takes some of that stuff on board. I think her husband is probably pretty smart - he has a first in Chemistry from Oxford - so not entirely surprising he’s bagged himself a decent job (or an attractive wife!!)
I think it's the "Reddit" in quotation marks that tickles me the most. Like that's allegedly it's name."It is called tattle something, j can't even remember"![]()
Both the ocado and the flight were not clearly said to be ads, ridiculousI watched her latest video without reading the caption first. I could tell *within seconds* that it was an AD. Of course her caption does NOT mention it being an ad until the end with her half-hidden “pr trip”. REPORT!