WonderShade18
Well-known member
Yes, although standards have that insulin is administered with a two nurse check.If she was staff nurse would she be allowed to administer insulin?
Yes, although standards have that insulin is administered with a two nurse check.If she was staff nurse would she be allowed to administer insulin?
Yeah I cannot imagine that trialGosh I understand, but it’s a lot for them to carry alone for a long time.
It wasnt done for stars trialJust a question/suggestion for the running of the thread...Will we be having a new thread opened daily with a link in description for the live reporting, for example Lucy Letby trial day 2..3..etc. I seem to recall this was done for Stars trial.
Thanks. I’m sure they’ll give more details during the trial but it sounds like some of these babies may have been receiving insulin as part of their treatment then?Neonatal hyperglycemia. Typically affects infants with low birth weights but instead of giving it like you would an adult with a pen you would have a sliding scale where you test sugars regularly and adjust infusion. It’s been a while since I’ve been on nnu so I’ll be a out of date with my knowledge but know enough
Exactly there has to be some evidenceI agree. No medical or legal background but it is inconceivable to me in this day and age a.) you’d successfully pull off a scandal like this of this scale and seriousness without someone blabbing, and b.) I know the police don’t always get things right but I don’t believe for a second they haven’t got some solid proof
Ok so he’s a bit more credible than the Facebook crew who just think it’s a coverup because they hate the police / CPS / hospital / think she doesn’t look like a killer.They will be assisting the defence with this case. Richard Gill has managed to get two convictions quashed of medical murder where shift statistics are used as primary evidence. Poggiali actually worked loads of overtime , so was more present for more deaths as was logical.
View attachment 1633364
I know someone who looked for one of the families on Facebook. Absolute disgrace.I'm on about people in general on Facebook. I was making a general comment...
Sorry I misunderstood and thought you were saying it wouldn’t be a fair trial if they are making this info public.I'm not saying it's a bad thing. I was making two points, but not saying tha information would mean no fair trial...
God u just expect these people know what they’re doingConsidering how many hospital scandals there have been, involving needless deaths due to negligence and incompetence, it’s actually really concerning to hear that the hospital didn’t act until the parents made a fuss. Reminds me of this story: 200 babies and nine mothers died, countless other babies left with disabilities:
![]()
Shrewsbury maternity scandal: Repeated failures led to deaths
Some 201 babies may have died at an NHS trust because of unprecedented failures, says report.www.bbc.co.uk
My guess that human error is always more likely that faulty machinery.
You know what? I don’t want LL to be guilty. I think that’s true for so many of us. Horrific as it is, it would be easier for this to be yet another hospital-wide scandal rather than the evil behaviour of one nurse.
Only when deliberating I think well when I did it that was the case
Gosh I understand, but it’s a lot for them to carry alone for a long time.No...not at all. They can't influence each others decisions. They can only discuss when the judge releases them for a verdict.
Sad story. I am not from this area but about five minutes down the road. The girl went to my child’s school.in my area at the moment a 14 year old has been stabbed to death by another 14 year old boy and a 13 year old girl is also still in custody. They are not naming names but everyone knows who it is and there is absolute hell on over it. They probably will be able to live a completely normal life even if they get 10 years because they could easily move away and no one will know them. Wether that is right or not is another story.
Wonder how they died. Could she have administered something and got the wrong quantity.This is just mind boggling. It’s hard to think that someone who goes into this profession would do this, it really is and not just once but multiple times, I don’t know, I just don’t want to believe it’s true at all.
I just think it's wrong to look for something a judge has said cannot be released etc.I don’t think it’s such a terrible thing (people are curious) and as long as no one is prying into the lives of the parents and wider family I don’t see a problem. The names will be released again at some point, presumably?
So it'll start now?