messytessy
Active member
Jesus!! Mystery lover boy dr has been found dead
- Notice
Haveyouanywool
VIP Member
I don’t want to sound like a conspiracy theorist but if anyone had the knowledge to kill themselves by diabetic coma it would be him.
His life had gone down the toilet and dying from a medical reason would mean his family would still get any insurance.
It could just be that I’m an old cynic.
His life had gone down the toilet and dying from a medical reason would mean his family would still get any insurance.
It could just be that I’m an old cynic.
Lady Thirlwall publishing her report on 15th September. Many Letby supporters said this wouldn't happen.
thirlwall.public-inquiry.uk
Publication of the final report | The Thirlwall Inquiry
The Thirlwall Inquiry Report will be published on 15 September 2026 in Liverpool.
thirlwall.public-inquiry.uk
Padparadascha
VIP Member
I imagine the strain of being associated with one of the worst serial killers in UK history cant have helped his health in recent years.
Lynn’ssnazzycardigan
VIP Member
It’s infuriating that any articles mentioning her have the caveat she “maintains her innocence”, mentioning “prosecution claims” and the “experts” appealing to the CCRC. Bitch was convicted at 2 separate trials. You’re allowed to refer to her as guilty and state what she DID, no alleged about it.
MmmB777
VIP Member
Nadine Dorres writing today in DM about Dr A. She says he was a key witness. She describes Letby as a happy, shy nurse, liked by everyone, was a stickler for the rules and would not cut corners. (What about all the texting whilst in the nursery and pushing the feed through. What about taking 200+ handover sheets home and asking Dr A for confidential patient information in text messages!!!) She says the prosecution were struggling to build a case but found their chance with Dr A and they jumped on it!!! He flirted with Letby and she was slightly in awe of him. He was not unattractive (anyone who has seen his picture would agree he wasn't good looking at all). He had chosen Lucy as the object of his attention. She says as a former nurse (for all of 2 minutes) I've seen many times bosses taking advantage of young female employees. She says he later claimed it was Lucy who had manipulated him and deceived him. She said she was questioned by the prosecution who portrayed her as an emotionally, needy temptress and worse a harlot. She effectively says if it wasn't for Dr A's evidence Letby would be a free woman. What a lot of rubbish Dorres is churning.
Shinythings
VIP Member
I'm sick of arguing with idiots about this. Every post out come the morons with the same sound bite arguments having the audacity to tell me to 'do my research' when if they had followed the trial for even a day they would realise how stupid they sound. Babe, I've been following this trial since day 1, have some respect.
Wellthisisinteresting
VIP Member
Wellthisisinteresting
VIP Member
His poor children & wife that very suddenly lost their dad/ husband and to have his “legacy” connected to the uks worst child killer of our time how awful for them.
LittleMy
VIP Member
Is it definitely our Big Nick? Not this guy?Anyone brave enough to follow the trial for poor baby Preston currently going on? To my absolute horror our BNE is KC for the defence.
Tomi2015
VIP Member
Once this is all over and done with and it’s made official that the creature isn’t going anywhere. The parents should sue every one of these so called experts and journalists that have too much to say, for emotional distress. Especially Gill and that Dorres cunt or whatever her name is
I found it really strange how the general public were pleased about Huntley being beaten to death but concerned about Letby being woken up too early on the morning of her arrest and the neighbours possibly seeing her dressing gown ( even though she could have worn her coat instead).
They are both child murderers they are as a bad as each other.
They are both child murderers they are as a bad as each other.
DianaBanana
VIP Member
The response from Cheshire police is wonderful.
A statement issued by the force in response to the allegations said: “Cheshire Constabulary strongly refutes all the points made during the adjournment debate. It implied impropriety on the part of Cheshire Constabulary where none whatsoever has been established.
“We remain confident in the integrity of the investigation, the conduct of the prosecution, and the decisions reached by the courts.
“Over the past two years the force has come under constant criticism and has been intensely scrutinised and subject to unpleasant opinion from a core group of individuals who appear to pride themselves on spreading misinformation, making baseless claims and attempting to destroy reputations.
“While scrutiny of policing is legitimate and welcome, it is essential that such scrutiny is grounded in fact and does not inadvertently cut across due process, ongoing legal considerations, or the independence of the judiciary.
“The constant noise surrounding this case, inaccurate or partial information being presented as fact and attempts to hi-jack the perceived narrative risk undermining public confidence not only in this case – but in the wider criminal justice system.
Public confidence is best served by evidence-based discussion and responsible commentary – not ill-informed personal opinions and inaccurate details. We are committed to victim-focused justice, public confidence, and the rule of law. Our thoughts remain with the families of the babies – who have always been at the heart of this case.”
A statement issued by the force in response to the allegations said: “Cheshire Constabulary strongly refutes all the points made during the adjournment debate. It implied impropriety on the part of Cheshire Constabulary where none whatsoever has been established.
“We remain confident in the integrity of the investigation, the conduct of the prosecution, and the decisions reached by the courts.
“Over the past two years the force has come under constant criticism and has been intensely scrutinised and subject to unpleasant opinion from a core group of individuals who appear to pride themselves on spreading misinformation, making baseless claims and attempting to destroy reputations.
“While scrutiny of policing is legitimate and welcome, it is essential that such scrutiny is grounded in fact and does not inadvertently cut across due process, ongoing legal considerations, or the independence of the judiciary.
“The constant noise surrounding this case, inaccurate or partial information being presented as fact and attempts to hi-jack the perceived narrative risk undermining public confidence not only in this case – but in the wider criminal justice system.
Public confidence is best served by evidence-based discussion and responsible commentary – not ill-informed personal opinions and inaccurate details. We are committed to victim-focused justice, public confidence, and the rule of law. Our thoughts remain with the families of the babies – who have always been at the heart of this case.”
Professional Chase, one of the experts on Letby's new panel who claimed that the insulin levels recorded for baby F and baby L were normal for pre term babies has made a complaint to ofcom regarding his interview with panorama.
He claims that he was treated unfairly and his views were misrepresented. Ofcom disagreed and have not upheld his complaint.
Ofcom's response can be found here:
If he can't cope with being challenged by a journalist, I doubt he would react well under cross examination.
He claims that he was treated unfairly and his views were misrepresented. Ofcom disagreed and have not upheld his complaint.
Ofcom's response can be found here:
If he can't cope with being challenged by a journalist, I doubt he would react well under cross examination.