Lucy Letby Case #81

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
For anyone who is interested Professor Peter Hindmarsh reported colleagues who were giving "gender-affirmation hormones" to children under the age of 16 and without an MDT assessment. He did not agree with this. Unfortunately the way things are today he fell foul of activists and you can guess the rest. The Guardian won't want to say this was the issue because many will have sympathy with him.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 23
For anyone who is interested Professor Peter Hindmarsh reported colleagues who were giving "gender-affirmation hormones" to children under the age of 16 and without an MDT assessment. He did not agree with this. Unfortunately the way things are today he fell foul of activists and you can guess the rest. The Guardian won't want to say this was the issue because many will have sympathy with him.
So nothing to do with Letby then. Isn't this the same journalist that was blagging about the notes saying ll was told by a therapist to write them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
So nothing to do with Letby then. Isn't this the same journalist that was blagging about the notes saying ll was told by a therapist to write them.
yes Felicity Lawrence.

the Professor reported Helen Webberley to the GMC [below] - she was struck off but later somehow the High Court found in her favour and she was reinstated (they did the same with Sir Roy Meadow). Then the gloves came off with malicious complaints against him from teenagers and their parents. The Guardian won't mention this because if they did honestly Hindmarsh would come out of it as a man of high integrity.

He's retired now and who can blame him there's only so much tit a man can take.
 

Attachments

  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 13
yes Felicity Lawrence.

the Professor reported Helen Webberley to the GMC [below] - she was struck off but later somehow the High Court found in her favour and she was reinstated (they did the same with Sir Roy Meadow). Then the gloves came off with malicious complaints against him from teenagers and their parents. The Guardian won't mention this because if they did honestly Hindmarsh would come out of it as a man of high integrity.

He's retired now and who can blame him there's only so much tit a man can take.
Thank you for sharing these details, I was at work earlier so couldn’t delve, this has settled a tiny bit of worry that article planted for me. Not that I thought it was the wrong outcome or anything just that this could be a reason for an appeal. If all they have are smear tactics of the experts and inflated egos, then 🤷🏽‍♀️
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Are they actually not reporting what it was all about? How pathetic. Webberley is an insane, evil crank and it only makes Prof H more of a hero in my eyes.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 18
The Guardian asked BNE for his comment

The prosecuting barrister, Johnson, told the defence he would oppose the jury being told anything about the GMC investigation, on the grounds that it had not reached a final adjudication. The Guardian asked Johnson about that position. He replied via a representative: “We do not conduct cases through journalists.”

🤣🤣🤣
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 25
on X Dr Phil seems to have got his hands on some of Letby's unused trial reports - in particular those regarding insulin babies F & L. Seems he doesn't like what he sees and prefers the new reports from the world's greatest.

 
on X Dr Phil seems to have got his hands on some of Letby's unused trial reports - in particular those regarding insulin babies F & L. Seems he doesn't like what he sees and prefers the new reports from the world's greatest.

Oh wow I didn’t consider Mark McD would leak the original defence reports through his minions! No wonder their tactic is to now go very hard on Prof Hindmarsh.

Full post for those without X.

IMG_7280.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
The Guardian asked BNE for his comment

The prosecuting barrister, Johnson, told the defence he would oppose the jury being told anything about the GMC investigation, on the grounds that it had not reached a final adjudication. The Guardian asked Johnson about that position. He replied via a representative: “We do not conduct cases through journalists.”

🤣🤣🤣
This is exactly the kind of comment that cements his status and name as BNE!
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 11
Oh wow I didn’t consider Mark McD would leak the original defence reports through his minions! No wonder their tactic is to now go very hard on Prof Hindmarsh.

Full post for those without X.

View attachment 3911927
He's lying when he says "severe restrictions" - Professor Hindmarsh was never removed from patient facing clinical work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
It's incredible how far down the rabbit hole some are prepared to go - Ian Huntley was set up as part of a conspiracy apparently

 
  • Sick
  • Angry
Reactions: 12
I don't know why people find it so hard to believe that people do awful things? I wonder if thinking everything is a conspiracy feels less scary than knowing the world can be an awful place?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
I think it's people with low self-esteem who believe they have an insight that very few others possess
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.