She isn't a psychopath, nor a sadist, not a narcissist, or machiavellian.
Now it becomes a far more interesting question.
She probably is a covert narcissist. Had to be the best.
She isn't a psychopath, nor a sadist, not a narcissist, or machiavellian.
Now it becomes a far more interesting question.
And you know that how? Anyway not interested in a discussion about the evil witch's personality. This thread is about the factsShe isn't a psychopath, nor a sadist, not a narcissist, or machiavellian.
Now it becomes a far more interesting question.
Ah that one. I tend not to read its posts they are the sort of dribble I avoid on X.x.com
x.com
1000%, one of Slingo’s oldest Twitter friends
There were lots of discussions about why during the original trial.To be fair, people seem much more comfortable arguing the toss about insulin assays, and there are multiple pile-on about that, but when it's asked "why", or what drove Lucy Letby to commit those crimes, people seem more reluctant to offer a reason.
It's interesting to see that lack of balance skewing any perceptions, and consequentially, discussions about her.
Dodgy bleepsThe Lucy Letby mumsnet thread has taken a strange turn and now appears to about recovering from a vaginal prolapse!
How do you know?She isn't a psychopath, nor a sadist, not a narcissist, or machiavellian.
Now it becomes a far more interesting question.
From all the detailed reports in the Chester Standard. Isn’t that how all assessments are done? 🫠How do you know?
I agree with all of this. It’s what I’ve thought for ages but couldn’t articulate it. I admit I’m fascinated with her personality and would like to know more about her psychological profile.In terms of understanding 'why she did it', it does seem a bit of a pointless exercise, althought it's the aspect that interests and frustrates me more than anything.
As I've said before, I think Letby has convinced herself that she's innocent, especially with the 'benefits' of time passed. I believe she has something of a dual persona ongoing, which makes it quite easy and possible for her to detach herself from the more hideous aspects of what she's done. It doesn't have to 'fit' any existing model of a psycopathy. There are always outliers or unique situations, simply because we are all individuals. There may well be commonalities with the behaviour of other serial killers but by the very nature of individuality, no two pathways to murdering are exactly the same. Unless Letby became willing to confront the aspects of her personality which enabled her to harm and kill, nobody is going to be any wiser. The best of the best haven't been able to figure it out and I think she's a million miles away from facing it. While there are people storming her cause and giving her merit, the chances of her coming clean are even more remote.....if any of that makes sense.
The only thing that gives me any ease is that I don't think there's any imminent prospect of her release.
Agreed. The crimes could only have been committed by someone with zero emphany. She showed a lack a self preservation by continuing to attack as the doctors grew concerned over the high mortality and by keeping the post it notes.She probably is a covert narcissist. Had to be the best.
I think she probably coukdnt help herself at the end even though she knew the net was closing, killers always get caught, and the more she harmed, the less careful she was. The attack on baby O was one of pure rage.Agreed. The crimes could only have been committed by someone with zero emphany. She showed a lack a self preservation by continuing to attack as the doctors grew concerned over the high mortality and by keeping the post it notes.
I doubt it i really do. There are massive holes in what the self titled creme de la creme came up with, massive questions over Lee's new paper which looks to have been specifically written to fit the narrative, paucity of actual experts, they had neonatal experts, a nurse and a couple of engineers. No forensic pathologists, no endocrinologist, no radiologist. There was absolutely nothing new in what was said, most of it had either been covered in the trial, or in Lee's case, thrown out at appeal. She's never getting free.I followed these threads all through but stepped away after as I found the increasingly louder shes innocent voices in the media troubling. It really concerns me that she will get out because of more recent medical voices adding to this and public pressure. The thought of her out in public is honestly chilling
That’s reassuring, because like the poster above, I too have found it really worrying that her appeal will be granted. The LL innocent brigade really infuriate me and make me sick to my stomach, so I can’t imagine how the parents of the victims are feeling.I doubt it i really do. There are massive holes in what the self titled creme de la creme came up with, massive questions over Lee's new paper which looks to have been specifically written to fit the narrative, paucity of actual experts, they had neonatal experts, a nurse and a couple of engineers. No forensic pathologists, no endocrinologist, no radiologist. There was absolutely nothing new in what was said, most of it had either been covered in the trial, or in Lee's case, thrown out at appeal. She's never getting free.
I can't see any way her appeal gets allowed on what we've heard. If it was then that would mean they'd made an exception for Letby by allowing her to use expert evidence in appeal when she didn't use it at trial without a reasonable explanation why. This would then create a precedent allowing all defendants to use one strategy at trial then if that fails have another go at appeal with a different approach. It shouldn't really get any further than the Commission but they may pass the buck to the Appeal court just to avoid more bad press.That’s reassuring, because like the poster above, I too have found it really worrying that her appeal will be granted. The LL innocent brigade really infuriate me and make me sick to my stomach, so I can’t imagine how the parents of the victims are feeling.
Yeah agree. The CCRC shouldn't pass it back to CoA because they need to do their job properly but like you say, they may pass the buck. But then once it comes up against the appeal judges she's done. Nowhere else to go. And serves her bloody well rightI can't see any way her appeal gets allowed on what we've heard. If it was then that would mean they'd made an exception for Letby by allowing her to use expert evidence in appeal when she didn't use it at trial without a reasonable explanation why. This would then create a precedent allowing all defendants to use one strategy at trial then if that fails have another go at appeal with a different approach. It shouldn't really get any further than the Commission but they may pass the buck to the Appeal court just to avoid more bad press.
After listening to the enquiry I'm absolutely convinced this was her revenge for failing parts of her nursing training. She's clearly been raised by her oddball parents to believe she is perfect, gets a hard kick of reality when she fails, it hurts her ego so much that she decides she'll show them. She kills babies as revenge but also to gain some power back that she feels she's lost after that blow to her ego. This then explains the 'I killed them on purpose because I wasn't good enough to care for them'.I’ve been mildly interested in what drove Lucy’s murderous behaviour but I’m actually way more interested in the systems that should have prevented it. As a society there will unfortunately always be rogue individuals who cause untold harm but as a society we should be looking to learn how to prevent that harm from running unchecked. I really hope the recommendations from the Thirlwall Inquiry will be implemented but the cynic in me expects they will mainly gather dust in a drawer somewhere.
I also think this is her reacting to her parents. She had zero control over her own life, they controlled everything she did, she had to ho on holiday with them, they bought her house and car abd basically still ordered her around abd ran her life for her. I think this is her being controlling because she could and she wasn't able to control much else in her life.After listening to the enquiry I'm absolutely convinced this was her revenge for failing parts of her nursing training. She's clearly been raised by her oddball parents to believe she is perfect, gets a hard kick of reality when she fails, it hurts her ego so much that she decides she'll show them. She kills babies as revenge but also to gain some power back that she feels she's lost after that blow to her ego. This then explains the 'I killed them on purpose because I wasn't good enough to care for them'.