- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
.
Aha! It was all a dastardly plot by Madame Tussauds to get a new waxwork for the chamber of horrors
Who needs facts and logic when you can just bluster irrelevant, unfounded, incorrect sentences fluently from your a, with seemingly no care for the distress to the parents?
This debate made me furious. I know the NG talking points are superficially convincing if you don't know the case well. But ffs it wouldn't have taken David Davis much work to check out these assertions, even, gosh imagine it read the CoA ruling and also the accounts of what evidence was presented to the jury. He obviously couldn't be bothered. Many people are too busy to dive into the case. But they're not using their position in Parliament in a way that must be causing so much anguish to the parents.
Last edited:
They all bugger off after PMQs on a Wednesday, so speaking late in the afternoon is especially bad if you want MPs to be there. Generally there isn't much turnout for adjournment debates anyway as it's when most people take a comfort break or get food.
Edited to add - I wrote this before seeing what you all wrote about DR'S speech
I'm not convinced he's spent much time on this. He was talking about things that have already been dealt with by the Court of Appeal as if he didn't know they had been. He's being used but is too old and slow to realise - kind of like a less sharp Joe Biden.
He’s either got Mark McDick and team to write the speech or he just lifted everything that was said at the press conference. have they just found a really gullible MP to do their dirty work or is there some other association.
---
Honestly, this was just a co-ordinated part of their campaign. How timely that this occurred just a few weeks after the press conference, further repeating their claims and shoving it back into the minds of the public whilst claiming more headlines. They probably have a roadmap of publicity like this to ensure they keep doing high profile stuff that keeps it in the headlines. The aim here is to turn as many of the public as they can. Most likely to influence possible future juries. And I’ll give it to them, getting an MP to repeat their rubbish was a smart move when you see how many on social media who don’t know the details have fallen for it. It’s utterly disgraceful.
---
Honestly, this was just a co-ordinated part of their campaign. How timely that this occurred just a few weeks after the press conference, further repeating their claims and shoving it back into the minds of the public whilst claiming more headlines. They probably have a roadmap of publicity like this to ensure they keep doing high profile stuff that keeps it in the headlines. The aim here is to turn as many of the public as they can. Most likely to influence possible future juries. And I’ll give it to them, getting an MP to repeat their rubbish was a smart move when you see how many on social media who don’t know the details have fallen for it. It’s utterly disgraceful.
Last edited:
It’s Norwich. I forget his first name.
I'm wondering whether one of the NG tribe is one of his constituents and has put him up to this, his speech was so poorly researched anyone would think one of the NG gang wrote it
It will be a bit of an anti-climax when tonight’s headlines becomes tomorrow’s chip paper and Letby still isn’t going anywhere. David Davis wont get to speak on it again anytime soon.
I’m sure Letby HQ have other publicity events in the pipeline though. Watch this space!
I just think they are throwing as much mud against the wall hoping some will stick before new charges arrive.
“ Don’t look over here … look over there “ mentality.
It will keep coming periodically then fizzle out.
Rinse and repeat.
“ Don’t look over here … look over there “ mentality.
It will keep coming periodically then fizzle out.
Rinse and repeat.
Here’s the transcript.
---
Is this new?
Questions have also been raised about the second expert witness for the prosecution, Dr Sandie Bohin. Eight families are currently filing formal complaints against her over their children’s care, which are being considered by the General Medical Council.
---
Is this new?
Questions have also been raised about the second expert witness for the prosecution, Dr Sandie Bohin. Eight families are currently filing formal complaints against her over their children’s care, which are being considered by the General Medical Council.
Last edited:
I'd heard this during the trial. It maybe common for any paediatricians, they work in highly charge cases collecting evidence that children have been abused or families are angry when a child's treatment doesn't work. Probably has no relevance to the trial.
---
They are all in together, Crapton, Saritta Adams, Gill etc. There wasn't anything new in his speech.
---
I did feel for BM in DD's speech, when he said Lucy was wrongly imprisoned due to the defence not raising points about the taps and baby O's care. They did make these points when they called Lorenzo the plumber and questioned Dr Marindas ,the child pathologist, on baby O liver injury.
Last edited:
Yes BM really got the sht end of the stick when he had to take on Letby. Probably making sure he's very busy now so he's not available if she's charged again.
Only one paper has Letby / David Davis story on the front page today. Bet you can’t guess which paper. Go on have a guess. It’s not the slightest bit predictable. Really don’t think you will guess it.
I’ll do a new thread…
---
New thread
I’ll do a new thread…
---
New thread
Lucy Letby Case #78
Last thread here https://tattle.life/threads/lucy-letby-case-77.47574/ --- Thirlwall Inquiry is still ongoing but oral evidence is expected to end in the next two weeks. The inquiry website is full of information including daily transcripts and evidence https://thirlwall.public-inquiry.uk/
tattle.life
- Status