what astounds me more than anything is these so called professionals happy to speak out publicly knowing full well they haven’t seen the medical records for the babies. They haven’t seen any scans or post mortem reports. Why would you put your reputation at risk in such a way? I hope I don’t ever need real life medical advice from any of them if they are happy to make diagnosis and decisions in this way.
They are literally basing their viewpoint off media reports, many of which have now massively misconstrued evidence beyond recognition. I bet they haven’t even read the original live reporting from Chester standard. They are just reading things their mates are writing and stuff like the New Yorker. Commentary that deliberately omit critical evidence.
From that article
"There was no evidence in the trial to suggest significant quantities of insulin had gone missing on the ward"
Was it not shown that there was 3/4 times as much insulin used as previous years?
What are the BBC going on about