Lucy Letby Case #74

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
what astounds me more than anything is these so called professionals happy to speak out publicly knowing full well they haven’t seen the medical records for the babies. They haven’t seen any scans or post mortem reports. Why would you put your reputation at risk in such a way? I hope I don’t ever need real life medical advice from any of them if they are happy to make diagnosis and decisions in this way.

They are literally basing their viewpoint off media reports, many of which have now massively misconstrued evidence beyond recognition. I bet they haven’t even read the original live reporting from Chester standard. They are just reading things their mates are writing and stuff like the New Yorker. Commentary that deliberately omit critical evidence.

From that article

"There was no evidence in the trial to suggest significant quantities of insulin had gone missing on the ward"

Was it not shown that there was 3/4 times as much insulin used as previous years?


What are the BBC going on about
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 17
From that article

"There was no evidence in the trial to suggest significant quantities of insulin had gone missing on the ward"

Was it not shown that there was 3/4 times as much insulin used as previous years?


What are the BBC going on about
Yes it was. And I doubt very much that prosecution would have brought this up at all if there had been a simple explanation for double the usage of insulin when just by coincidence, in the same time period, two babies were proven to have been poisoned.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 13
The telegraph are live reporting but it's Sarah Crapton so assume it'll be skewed in Letby's favour.

Oh has she actually put together the sentence ‘serial killer Lucy Letby’ ??
---
Oh there’s multiple journalists involved so that’s probably not her sentence. Hope she’s ok with that 🙄
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 11
I'm going to go ahead and say there's something weird about the pro-Letby attention. Any serious journalist wouldn't report the opinions of doctors who haven't seen all the evidence. I don't care if it's conspiracy theory or whatever but is her dad a mason or similar? Why was he allowed to sit in on meetings with hospital management and why is this nonsense STILL persisting?

And why the utterly bleeping duck is that bull headline news at the BBC when SO MUCH of the heartbreaking and devastating enquiry hasn't even remotely graced their front page?!?!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18
I'm going to go ahead and say there's something weird about the pro-Letby attention. Any serious journalist wouldn't report the opinions of doctors who haven't seen all the evidence. I don't care if it's conspiracy theory or whatever but is her dad a mason or similar? Why was he allowed to sit in on meetings with hospital management and why is this nonsense STILL persisting?

And why the utterly bleeping duck is that bull headline news at the BBC when SO MUCH of the heartbreaking and devastating enquiry hasn't even remotely graced their front page?!?!
I wonder if it’s more that journalists just aren’t serious these days. Every news outlet seems to have their own agenda across a variety of topics - look at politics, covid, Israel/Gaza. I feel like there are just very few, unbiased journalists these days. They either believe the conspiracies themselves or they are just utterly self serving and prioritising click bait.

I’ll do a new thread…
---
New thread
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 12
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.