New Letby Support Group alert!
I wonder who Lucius Puff is?
I wonder who Lucius Puff is?
Attachments
-
64.3 KB
There must be some way the police could get involved. Surely this can’t be legal!Look at this shameless piece of tit Sarrita Adams who is now officially begging for cash off the back of the Lucy Letby case.
View attachment 2521574
View attachment 2521578
View attachment 2521579
She’s even selling merch. This is hands down worse than ANY influencer grift I have ever seen I’ve seen on Tattlelife.
Tasteless doesn’t even begin to describe what she is doing here making money off the back of such appalling crimes.
hahaha where is old @blueyfan3684? She was qualityWho made all that thread merch that timewas it Bluey? They were so funny.
Imagine if you got science on trial socks for Christmas 🫥 bet Ian’s got a few crispy pairs already#wanksock
Haha! I forgot about these, they’re brilliant. I’ve got to go & share them on the weird FB grouphahaha where is old @blueyfan3684? She was quality![]()
Maybe we should have a pair of socks made for Ian out of one of Bluey’s creationsWho made all that thread merch that timewas it Bluey? They were so funny.
Imagine if you got science on trial socks for Christmas 🫥 bet Ian’s got a few crispy pairs already#wanksock
Absolutely brilliant!!In the absence of Bluey I've taken it upon myself to start a new range in time for Christmas.
People seeing through their rit hopefully! Is Mr Chaotic Dicky Gill?The Science on Trial meeting was interesting today. The host blinded everyone with science focusing on pathogens, clusters of deaths & insulin problems. Basically saying that babies A,C,D,& possibly E died because of an outbreak of viruses & baby F’s insulin problems were also a result of a virus that affected how they produced insulin & glucose. Apparently the figures all over the country showed an increase in deaths because of summer viruses! One of the zoom users said that she was just focusing on finding theories about why it couldn’t be Letby that killed the babies & suggested she look at other reasons for the deaths. I don’t think the host was very happy about hearing that & went onanunhingeda rant about the consultants & how they didn’t do their job properly, about the lack of ward rounds & why that would increase the risk of deaths on the days when there wasn’t a ward round & said they were lazy & didn’t investigate reasons for the deaths & collapses. She then said that baby E’s death wasn’t registered when it should have been & that she thinks the death was registered as a still birth to avoid them having to do an autopsy because the consultants knew they were to blame for the baby’s death. She also said that one of the babies fathers had claimed that the neonatal was in such a state that lots of babies were becoming unwell & that he suspected pathogens/viruses were to blame & asked whether any of the consultants had checked into that. I don’t remember that ever being said.
She also mentioned that ‘a certain individual who is no longer associated with SoT because she found them chaotic!, has been constantly trying to speak to the defence team without success. However they have actually been speaking to Letby’s father & trying to persuade him to change her legal team. Apparently this person has given him a long list of solicitors to contact. She thinks that this has made SoT look bad & that’s why the defence team won’t speak to her
Oh & the people attending are dwindling, instead of the usual 80 there were only about 50 there today
![]()
Yes hopefully. They didn’t say it was Dicky but I think it probably isPeople seeing through their rit hopefully! Is Mr Chaotic Dicky Gill?
I can't think of anyone else who's been told to duck off by the defence team on more than one occasion!Yes hopefully. They didn’t say it was Dicky but I think it probably is
How was the link to the zoom communicated this week? Usually she posts it on the site but this time it wasn’tThe Science on Trial meeting was interesting today. The host blinded everyone with science focusing on pathogens, clusters of deaths & insulin problems. Basically saying that babies A,C,D,& possibly E died because of an outbreak of viruses & baby F’s insulin problems were also a result of a virus that affected how they produced insulin & glucose. Apparently the figures all over the country showed an increase in deaths because of summer viruses! One of the zoom users said that she was just focusing on finding theories about why it couldn’t be Letby that killed the babies & suggested she look at other reasons for the deaths. I don’t think the host was very happy about hearing that & went onanunhingeda rant about the consultants & how they didn’t do their job properly, about the lack of ward rounds & why that would increase the risk of deaths on the days when there wasn’t a ward round & said they were lazy & didn’t investigate reasons for the deaths & collapses. She then said that baby E’s death wasn’t registered when it should have been & that she thinks the death was registered as a still birth to avoid them having to do an autopsy because the consultants knew they were to blame for the baby’s death. She also said that one of the babies fathers had claimed that the neonatal was in such a state that lots of babies were becoming unwell & that he suspected pathogens/viruses were to blame & asked whether any of the consultants had checked into that. I don’t remember that ever being said.
She also mentioned that ‘a certain individual who is no longer associated with SoT because she found them chaotic!, has been constantly trying to speak to the defence team without success. However they have actually been speaking to Letby’s father & trying to persuade him to change her legal team. Apparently this person has given him a long list of solicitors to contact. She thinks that this has made SoT look bad & that’s why the defence team won’t speak to her
Oh & the people attending are dwindling, instead of the usual 80 there were only about 50 there today
![]()
Nor can I, it's gotta be himI can't think of anyone else who's been told to duck off by the defence team on more than one occasion!
I get an email each weekHow was the link to the zoom communicated this week? Usually she posts it on the site but this time it wasn’t
How old is your account? I got an invite last week and the week before but not this one.I get an email each week
Sorry I don’t record the meetings but I’m happy to share the link to join the meetings in future. I signed up with two different email addresses & names. The email for one goes into my inbox but the other one goes to spam, maybe yours have started to do that.How old is your account? I got an invite last week and the week before but not this one.
Bless you for sitting through that drivel.
If she only makes the recording available privately, I would be in your debt if you would share it
Oh they're in my junk allright. But I just didn't get an invitation one this week like I have before.Sorry I don’t record the meetings but I’m happy to share the link to join the meetings in future. I signed up with two different email addresses & names. The email for one goes into my inbox but the other one goes to spam, maybe yours have started to do that.
I'm quite certain that a chunk of her audience is just lookie-loos. People love watching trainwrecksSo there are at least three of you on this thread that try to attend the meetings, I’m guessing purely for entertainment purposes?
Wonder how many others out of the dwindling numbers are doing the same!
Oh that’s odd. Might be worth signing up under another email address. I’ll also try to remember to share the link to the meeting if I get oneOh they're in my junk allright. But I just didn't get an invitation one this week like I have before.
---
I'm quite certain that a chunk of her audience is just lookie-loos. People love watching trainwrecks
Haha I bet there’s a lot, there’s quite a few ‘zoom user’ profiles they’re probably there for fun or as spiesSo there are at least three of you on this thread that try to attend the meetings, I’m guessing purely for entertainment purposes?
Wonder how many others out of the dwindling numbers are doing the same!