Cross between the milky bar kid & Augustus Gloop
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Richard Gill is going to be giving a talk about why he thinks Lucifer is guilty tomorrow, and has shared his slideshow:
https://www.slideshare.net/gill1109...H0bqjwPwf3ugeHre-kje1wB6qfT4tlBWGESC4H0v-fyGE
https://www.slideshare.net/gill1109...H0bqjwPwf3ugeHre-kje1wB6qfT4tlBWGESC4H0v-fyGE
Thanks for sharing this. Disagree with Richard that many of the affected babies were very premature, it was only really baby K as while baby I and G were very premature they were older when attacked.
Science on Trial seems to miss the fact that COCH's microbiology department do blood cultures to look for bacteria and CRP (a marker for infection ) testing and there would have been evidence if the babies had died of an infection. I think a lot of their motivation is fraud, they are hiding behind science but what they are doing isn't scientific.
There are lots of Paediatricians in the world who would have now heard of this case and yet none of them are speaking out. BM is a highly respected KC surely he wanted a better more appropriate medical expert then the plumber.
Exactly. Most of the babies were 31-2 weeks. Gill talks a whole load of fluffy nonsense. Not quite sure where he thinks he's going with this, his 'evidence' has already been rejected! I don't think any of the babies showed signs of infection. They get it all sooooo wrong and yet the saps hang off their every word.
Is he 12?
‘what convinced the jurors’ … he has no bleeping idea!!
These are my personal favourites. I think he’s going senile.
(no he didn’t)
(There were no tv vans)
(there were never 30 charges)
(you ARE crackpots and conspiracy theorists)
Ah yes. I'm always sure to reference the work of racists and winos when I have an important work presentation to do. What a bleeping pleb.
Brilliant rebuttal there, send it to him! Bloody idiot he hasn't got a clue about the trial has he? Absolute plank
It is so basic, a child could have written it
Haha! I’d be a bit pissed off if I was Merlot Mark… Reconstruction by an amateur!
---
Hahaha! That’s so funny, what a weird little f*cker he was & still is! I’m really tempted to change my profile pic to that
I genuinely nearly pissed myself laughing at that!It is so basic, a child could have written it
Haha! I’d be a bit pissed off if I was Merlot Mark… Reconstruction by an amateur!
---
Hahaha! That’s so funny, what a weird little f*cker he was & still is! I’m really tempted to change my profile pic to that
I'm calling him Slideshow Bob from now on
Honestly though, that "presentation" is the biggest load of horseshit that I have seen written about this case. It contains lie after lie after lie, complete and utter drivel.
Do we know who he is presenting this bull to?
He's presenting it here
Attachments
He's shitting on his entire career and is going to be a laughing stock to everyone who knows him personally
Hahahaahahahahahaaaaaa
Hahahaahahahahahaaaaaa
I'm sure they will be blown away by his presentation!
I’m sure they’ll all find it riveting!
This will be their response after a few minutes of him venerating a serial child killer, a pisshead and a neo-nazi
Attachments
Made you a picture of Slideshow
---
Such a flattering photo of
Attachments
Last edited:
I’ve honestly given up now with the absolute nut jobs that think she’s innocent. All they ever say is science and scapegoating 
I don’t even argue with them any more. They actually think that she’s going to win an appeal.
I don’t even argue with them any more. They actually think that she’s going to win an appeal.
Last edited:
A tale of Lucy's what? The wick hasn't even mastered when to use the possessive apostrophe, let alone have the wherewithal to analyse complex evidence in a case of serial murders in a medical setting.
- Status