I’m so conflicted by this case, before the trial began I was certain she was guilty purely based on how the story was presented by the media - it felt like her guilt was iron-clad!
But I’m really on the fence now, I agree she has done some odd things with the post it note, Facebook stalking and some of her responses to police or colleagues feel awkward and stilted, but as others have said, these are all subjective and don’t give us 100 per cent certainty that she did all of this.
I’m a socially awkward person with extreme anxiety and get the impression she is too, I can totally see her freezing like a deer in the headlights with the police or overthinking things by searching for parents on Facebook and catastrophising on her post it note.
I’m definitely not saying she’s innocent, I really want to know about the blood coming out of the babies mouth and what happened with the insulin in the IV bag, that will really cement for me whether she’s guilty or not.
I don’t think for one minute people are defending her, I think people just want to be sure she really is guilty before throwing away the key. We’ve seen so many people sent to prison based on ‘expert evidence’ only for there to be gaping great holes in the evidence later on: Amanda Knox, Louise Woodward and The mum whose baby was taken by a dingo in the 1980s.
I just hope those poor parents get some sort of resolution either way, I’m a mum and I honestly don’t think I’d be able to cope if I was them
