Takemetoyourbuffet
Chatty Member
Apparently, Fred West-Ham is 'offensive'
Uncanny!You know who I think Lucy looks abit like if you squint.
Jimmy Savile.
i struggle to see what people want in terms of evidence. Imagine your child that you thought was doing well suddenly died in these circumstances and then a plethora of medical experts concluded your child was murdered, then it turned out there were another 25 suspicious incidents where 6 other babies unexpectedly died, and another 10 unexpectedly collapsed, in mostly similar circumstances over a very small time period. All this happens and there is one person present at every incident. And then you later found out that person searched you and every other parent on Facebook had paper work with you or your child’s name on and also wrote a note saying “I killed them on purpose” reasonable doubt is out the window, people go to jail for murder without a body in some cases. Here we’ve got 7 murders and zero defence if you don’t think she did it at this point imo you lack comprehension skills or just choose to ignore the factsSaid this a few weeks ago also, but the longer this goes on the more I feel it's likely she will actually get away with this.
Everyone knows she's guilty.
But was it proven beyond all reasonable doubt?
The whole case was built on circumstantial evidence alone and I don't know if it's enough.
No one witnessed her physically harm any baby, nothing caught on camera etc.
Yes she was seem hovering around babies in distress but no one actually witnessed her 'in the act'.
While there is plenty of medical evidence from post mortems of the injuries to the babies, similarities etc, there is no DNA evidence (LL DNA) like you would have in most murder cases.
It's very difficult I think.
Also I don't know if an unhinged rambling doodle half-confession on a sheet of paper from a 'mentally unstable' woman seemingly in the throws of desperation with PTSD as she claims is enough for a conviction.
I feel the prosecution focused too much on the handover sheets being kept also.
Anyone in the medical profession knows that while it is wrong and a breach in confidentiality, many nurses bring home handover sheets by mistake or let them build up in their handbags etc before shredding- I don't think this is ok but it does happen very regularly.
I know I think she is 100% a sick sadistic serial killer but I don't know if they proved that in court.
I think the hospital need to take a lot of the responsibility here aswell.
They failed those babies so much.
She should have been removed from her post as soon as concerns were raised and a pattern was emerging.
The hospital managers allowed many of the harm done to these babies to happen by not acting swiftly enough or contacting police.
I hope they reach a guilty verdict for the poor babies and their families, and maybe I am totally wrong - I hope I am but that's just my thoughts.....
They're all off to dismissed juror's wedding at the weekend and need the hangover day. Goss, BM & BNE are going too. LL assumed she was invited but found out she wasn't and is fuming.Gossy says it’s for good reason again. Guess we have to trust his judgement but I do really struggle to see how it came to this point again! Hey ho at least they didn’t find out at 10:31 Monday morning as perView attachment 2356690
I wanted to attend, and I think you knew that. Hatemylife ++They're all off to dismissed juror's wedding at the weekend and need the hangover day. Goss, BM & BNE are going too. LL assumed she was invited but found out she wasn't and is fuming.
Which bit would you like me to go over for you?I think doubt is creeping in. This is extremely hard, I totally agree.
I think you may have been overthinking this completely. I get it, its very emotive and we all just want justice for the wee babies and their families. The thought that justice won't be served is terrifying but she just needs to be found guilty of one murder charge to be put away. You don't have any more information than any of us so the scenario you've created in your mind could be completely inaccurate.I’ve voted no, and I hate to say this but I think it’s looking likely she’ll walk.
My reasoning,
I think at least 1 juror thinks NG on all, because I can’t fathom how anyone could believe shes G of some but not all, a serial killer is a serial killer, even if the evidence is sketchy on some charges, thinking about it rationally, even if they aren’t sure of some charges but are sure LL has harmed babies, the likeliness of doing it multiple times is huge.
And even averaging out 3.5 hours of deliberating per baby,I don’t think they will actually be doing that, for the same reasons above, you don’t need 3.5 hours to deliberate if you already know she’s a SK, if she’s done it twice, shes definitely done it more times.
And this might be unpopular and a bit sexist, but I think the NG juror is a man, simply because, I don’t believe a woman could question the evidence from baby es mummy, but, and I’m projecting here, blokes can be a bit fickle when it comes to a woman’s memory.
My heart tells me she’s guilty of all and more, my head tell me she’s walking out with a new identity and witness protection, which is scary, she’ll have a clean dbs and free to do whatever the duck she likes, life experiences have made me a tad cynical and bitter though.
Don't be heartbroken by something that hasn't happened yet.Completely agree & I'm heartbroken about it.