This is worded really weirdly. I wonder what’s going on. I also wonder if it’s the same juror ‘going sick’ quite often and they’re considering continuing with 11 jurors?
Can the judge tell this juror to do one this late in stage ? Maybe it’s the same one all the time..From the Standard
10:39am
Eleven of the 12 members of the jury come into court.
The judge tells them the trial cannot proceed unless all 12 of them are present, and one is not present for "particular personal reasons".
"There is obvious uncertainty in relation to your colleague's position", he adds.
The jury are urged to turn up tomorrow unless they hear otherwise.
The judge tells the jury: "We have had a lot of breaks, and there comes a time where we cannot keep having more and more breaks, as it becomes inappropriate.
"Events do occur which are unexpected, and we have had a few during this case."
The court is told that a view will be taken tomorrow on the 12th juror.
Sounds like they will let the 12th go tomorrow if they don’t turn up seems like it’s always them that can’t make it, it just faffs everyone around and costs lots of money!Not on, juror absence!!
---
Ffs!
What a waste of everyone's time. All the jurors as well. I wonder if it's the same person who has been off several timesFrom the Standard
10:39am
Eleven of the 12 members of the jury come into court.
The judge tells them the trial cannot proceed unless all 12 of them are present, and one is not present for "particular personal reasons".
"There is obvious uncertainty in relation to your colleague's position", he adds.
The jury are urged to turn up tomorrow unless they hear otherwise.
The judge tells the jury: "We have had a lot of breaks, and there comes a time where we cannot keep having more and more breaks, as it becomes inappropriate.
"Events do occur which are unexpected, and we have had a few during this case."
The court is told that a view will be taken tomorrow on the 12th juror.
I wonder if it's the same one continually causing all the disruption through absence?Sounds like the jury member might be leaving the jury if they don’t attend tomorrow and they could be down to 11.
When I did jury service many moons ago, one of my fellow jurors was dismissed really late in the case - we carried on as a Jury of 11. When we deliberated the Judge only accepted a unanimous decision or a 10-1 majority.Can the judge tell this juror to do one this late in stage ? Maybe it’s the same one all the time..
I’ve never liked how often it used to be a Monday. When the football was on, I don’t think court ever sat the day after an England gameI wonder if it's the same one continually causing all the disruption through absence?
Bloody hell.
Ive just googled it, apparently so.....Can they proceed with 11 Jurors does anyone know?
The Judges words make him sound slightly pissed at this turn of events.
Will today be spent in legal discussions, with BM trying to get it thrown out and BNE saying we'll just roll with the 11?
The one time I manage to fully catch up on the thread ready for court and this happens, sorry feel like I've cursed it.
Phew!
i think so, I wonder if they claim it’s because of childcare reasons which explains the wording. Feel even more flat today nowI wonder if it's the same one continually causing all the disruption through absence?
Bloody hell.
makes you wonder if it’s nearly always the same juror!From the Standard
10:39am
Eleven of the 12 members of the jury come into court.
The judge tells them the trial cannot proceed unless all 12 of them are present, and one is not present for "particular personal reasons".
"There is obvious uncertainty in relation to your colleague's position", he adds.
The jury are urged to turn up tomorrow unless they hear otherwise.
The judge tells the jury: "We have had a lot of breaks, and there comes a time where we cannot keep having more and more breaks, as it becomes inappropriate.
"Events do occur which are unexpected, and we have had a few during this case."
The court is told that a view will be taken tomorrow on the 12th juror.