Come on Della!
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Oh yes for sure. If they were to receive any erroneous requests for future trials I’d hope they’d shred the summons. Here’s hoping they have better memories about whether they own a shredder than Letby.
That's really interesting re: the Dr's rotating - has that been recorded, I must have totally missed that, thanks for sharing that. There was another Dr mentioned in the Wiki - Dr Beech, who seemed to be taking control of the tests and the results, so I again wonder, how it got bypassed. It just seems such a massive significant event that it's hard to understand how it just kind of... fizzled out I guess?
Giving evidence on Tuesday LL said that she obtained her qualification to look after intensive care babies in April/May 2015 after completing a 6 month course a LWH
11:13am https://www.chesterstandard.co.uk/n...y-letby-trial-tuesday-may-2---defence-begins/
Does this mean that she failed this course on 2013 or is she getting her timeline mixed up again?
11:13am https://www.chesterstandard.co.uk/n...y-letby-trial-tuesday-may-2---defence-begins/
Does this mean that she failed this course on 2013 or is she getting her timeline mixed up again?
The insulin wasn't at the limit of what the machine could read, the c-peptide was at the lowest the machine could read. According to the Wiki, anyway. And again, according to the Wiki, Dr Beech - who was there at the time, understood the test results.
The Wiki says:
The insulin reading is 4,657.
The insulin c-pep reading is less than 169.
Dr Beech says the insulin reading is "very high" - while there is no 'normal upper limit', that reading could be considered high, the court hears.
The insulin c-pep reading is the lowest reading the machine can record.
Well well well.
It's one of those things people working in the NHS know, I hope that the prosecution has told the jurors this considering the timing. It's not been reported but this is why people say don't get admitted in august.
The other insulin poisoning was done close to a black wednesday date as well, they rotated 6th April 2016 and baby L was poisoned on the 8th.
Unfortunately, a lot of tests fall on the SHOs. It's one of those things that need to be sorted out en masse, if it's a specialist test then really it needs interpreted by someone who actually knows about it. But the hospitals don't put time for doing this in consultant job plans, so the SHOs are left to sort...
…wanted a greater degree of privacy hey. You certainly did Letby.
I didn’t really consider/even think about her three year degree going’s on. She was spending time on the unit even further back then.
Attachments
7.3% think not guilty. I know that’s low but it’s still more than I thought!
Hmmm now that’s interesting!
Sorry going over old ground here 🥱 Those saying there’s no evidence… Very simple one here… Don’t you find it very odd that she is the only member of staff in that hospital that was present at every single incident? I mean, that’s really very unlucky for poor, innocent Lucy, isn’t it?
Ah yes Snapchat!It was the Snapchat data wasn’t it? Savanna was very smug believing that Snapchat deletes data after a certain amount of time so they had no proof of a significant video call but the prosecution then had a tech witness who was able to access and prove the timings of the call. It was a mic drop moment for sure
ETA: Loving all the crowns ladies
I had to look it up. And now I’m missing Dave Jagger even more. He was SO detailed
So Brockhill mentioned the Snapchat thing on day 22
on day 29 prosecution was able to call ‘evidence in rebuttal’. So this was a direct consequence of something she said on the stand. And the witness was a digital forensics operations manager with the police and held a computer forensics degree and basically rebutted everything Brockhill said
It was amazing to see. Still blows my mind how cocky and arrogant she was on the stand. I don’t think we will see that from Lucy.
Attachments
Baffling to me too. I suppose if she gets out she has some options to offer private nursing care to some
Side note, as I’ve said before, I wouldn’t leave her alone with a bag of crisps.
Sorry I have like 10 pages to catch up on still but this is how I picture No Name x
Attachments
Yes, very odd and literally incredibly unlucky. I was completely convinced by this but have shifted somewhat from this. It's not evidence exactly is it? it's the way that data appears from one perspective. If you look at data/ statistics/ patterns in the team I work in (not nursing) it would appear that a few of us are terrible practitioners with awful results, but look at it from bigger picture and it's completely different. I don't know a thing about data/ statistics but I just think there might be more to come or more to it.
I really don't know.
This was a total mic drop moment in that trial, it was absolutely brilliant how they shoehorned it in.Ah yes Snapchat!
I had to look it up. And now I’m missing Dave Jagger even more. He was SO detailed
So Brockhill mentioned the Snapchat thing on day 22
on day 29 prosecution was able to call ‘evidence in rebuttal’. So this was a direct consequence of something she said on the stand. And the witness was a digital forensics operations manager with the police and held a computer forensics degree and basically rebutted everything Brockhill said
It was amazing to see. Still blows my mind how cocky and arrogant she was on the stand. I don’t think we will see that from Lucy.
Was there ever a petition to get Dave Jagger a pay rise? I want to sign it
@MmmB777 saw this and thought of you! have you seen it? Just saw it mentioned on Twitter. Don’t think it’s made UK news as seems early stages.
www.dutchnews.nl
Nurse arrested in Assen hospital probe into patient deaths - DutchNews.nl
A 30-year-old man has been arrested on suspicion of involvement in the death of several patients at the Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis in Assen during the coronavirus pandemic, the public prosecution department said on Thursday. According to the AD, which has spoken to relatives of one of the victims, up...
www.dutchnews.nl
It was a proper *gasp!* momentAh yes Snapchat!
I had to look it up. And now I’m missing Dave Jagger even more. He was SO detailed
So Brockhill mentioned the Snapchat thing on day 22
on day 29 prosecution was able to call ‘evidence in rebuttal’. So this was a direct consequence of something she said on the stand. And the witness was a digital forensics operations manager with the police and held a computer forensics degree and basically rebutted everything Brockhill said
It was amazing to see. Still blows my mind how cocky and arrogant she was on the stand. I don’t think we will see that from Lucy.
Yeah I agree, I think LL will continue with her poor little girl act, turning on the waterworks when it suits. I feel like with some of the things she’s said already, she isn’t actually answering the question. She sort of skirts around it a bit.
- Status