Lucy Letby Case #27

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
oh yes. I wonder how long BM will question her for. I imagine it will be brief so she doesn’t trip herself up. Day at the most.
Just so intrigued by how it can at all come across well to say yeah I illegally took and kept hundreds of handovers that I told police I didn’t have and yeah I Facebook stalked tons of people but dunno why and just don’t mention how I linked babies from this case to each other despite some being poisoned, some dying and some surviving so presumably no link at that time.
Ah ok so you’re saying you’re a bleeping weirdo but just not thaaaaat much of a bleeping weirdo. It’s just really not a good look 🤣
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 18
Sorry if this is a stupid question but if the prosecution have concluded their case does that mean they won't be x examining her when she takes the stand?
They'll still cross examine any defence witnesses they want, including LL, they just won't present their own evidence.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 6
Just so intrigued by how it can at all come across well to say yeah I illegally took and kept hundreds of handovers that I told police I didn’t have and yeah I Facebook stalked tons of people but dunno why and just don’t mention how I linked babies from this case to each other despite some being poisoned, some dying and some surviving so presumably no link at that time.
Ah ok so you’re saying you’re a bleeping weirdo but just not thaaaaat much of a bleeping weirdo. It’s just really not a good look 🤣
Another big contradiction is how she's downplayed her nursing skills and claimed to be the most qualified nurse on the ward.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 15
oh yes. I wonder how long BM will question her for. I imagine it will be brief so she doesn’t trip herself up. Day at the most.
Questioning from your own barrister is called examination in chief, they can’t ask leading questions and essentially they talk about what has happened factually (their version of events) with their counsel guiding them through it, with questions that need an explanation. The other side will then cross examine using leading questions (think more yes/no type answers). Once you’ve been cross examined your barrister can then re examine you if they want to clarify any additional points raised during cross examination
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 20
Just so intrigued by how it can at all come across well to say yeah I illegally took and kept hundreds of handovers that I told police I didn’t have and yeah I Facebook stalked tons of people but dunno why and just don’t mention how I linked babies from this case to each other despite some being poisoned, some dying and some surviving so presumably no link at that time.
Ah ok so you’re saying you’re a bleeping weirdo but just not thaaaaat much of a bleeping weirdo. It’s just really not a good look 🤣
I can’t imagine they’ll ask her any of that though, that’ll be what she’s cross examined on. If her own barrister trips her up they’ve done something very wrong! You don’t aim to ask anything during examination in chief that will confuse or trip up your own witness
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 13
I can’t imagine they’ll ask her any of that though, that’ll be what she’s cross examined on. If her own barrister trips her up they’ve done something very wrong! You don’t aim to ask anything during examination in chief that will confuse or trip up your own witness
The defence have essentially had that as their normalisation of her behaviour though, he raised the point that she took 257 and referenced that that meant lots weren’t babies in the case. And about the searches he raised with the digital analysis person that she searched loads of people. So I very much doubt it’ll play out how I phrased it there 😆 but that has kinda been the defence of those behaviours all the way along.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
I wish it was our Dave or Brad from the T&A who was reporting this trial especially now
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 6
I can’t imagine they’ll ask her any of that though, that’ll be what she’s cross examined on. If her own barrister trips her up they’ve done something very wrong! You don’t aim to ask anything during examination in chief that will confuse or trip up your own witness
Do you believe she's guilty at this point Lilyrose? Or are you waiting to hear it all?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
The defence have essentially had that as their normalisation of her behaviour though, he raised the point that she took 257 and referenced that that meant lots weren’t babies in the case. And about the searches he raised with the digital analysis person that she searched loads of people. So I very much doubt it’ll play out how I phrased it there 😆 but that has kinda been the defence of those behaviours all the way along.
Haha in that case they might ask her about it, but in a way that supports their case. E.g accidentally took handover sheets, but not relating to this case, that she’s searched loads of people because she wants to see how they’re getting on. The problem with asking about that though is doing it in a way that doesn’t trip her up, unless she’s happy to say “I was just being nosy” in which case no doubt the prosecution will ask why she didn’t say that in police interview. It’ll be a bit of a minefield for sure!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.