Me too. I cant get the photographs out my mind, maybe because I think of other serial killers who took photos.The thought of this monster murdering 2 babies a day apart and then using them as props in some weird macabre photo session has actually made me feel physically sick.
I don't even want to imagine what was going through her twisted head as she did so.
I would be interested to know if she did seek permission as she states. Same as she stated the triplets parents asked her to be the nurse for P and their surviving son on the 24th. Their statements don’t mention her asking permission or asking for Letby to be nurse. It really is a disgusting violation for the parents of o&p beyond measure.Me too. I cant get the photographs out my mind, maybe because I think of other serial killers who took photos.Those poor parents. The memories and pictures of their beautiful, innocent babies tainted by such a horrifying reality.
Honestly I don’t see the point in announcing he’s there to then do thisOh I'm having a moan. (It's the menopause)
This frigging reporting is absolutely shocking. If Dan was on piecework he'd not earn enough to buy a loaf!!
What's the point in being there of he's saying nowt? We're at a critical point and these babies deserve their stories to be told.
It's really tit.
Yes that's got to be it.Honestly I don’t see the point in announcing he’s there to then do thisthe only other thing I can think is restrictions in reporting
![]()
If there is restrictions, will these be lifted and information shared after a verdict is reached?Honestly I don’t see the point in announcing he’s there to then do thisthe only other thing I can think is restrictions in reporting
![]()
Yeah I suspect so. Find out loads about people once convicted. I do expect alot of damning stuff to come out once/if convicted. I remember someone on here shared a fb comment at the beginning of trial and it was a relative of one of the families and they said that loads of weird, disturbing stuff would come out about Lucy and that she was a nutter or words to that effect.If there is restrictions, will these be lifted and information shared after a verdict is reached?
So if there are things from her childhood etc that are red flags can they not be used in the case and can only be released after the verdict?Yeah I suspect so. Find out loads about people once convicted. I do expect alot of damning stuff to come out once/if convicted. I remember someone on here shared a fb comment at the beginning of trial and it was a relative of one of the families and they said that loads of weird, disturbing stuff would come out about Lucy and that she was a nutter or words to that effect.
Erm I'm not too sure tbh. If it's not deemed relevant to the case then won't come out until after/if found guilty.So if there are things from her childhood etc that are red flags can they not be used in the case and can only be released after the verdict?
If it’s deemed prejudicial to a fair trial it can’t be disclosed, as far as I know.So if there are things from her childhood etc that are red flags can they not be used in the case and can only be released after the verdict?
No doubt we’ll hear a lot more but I don’t know whether we’ll know everythingIf there is restrictions, will these be lifted and information shared after a verdict is reached?
It wouldn't make any odds to the trial to be honest. She's either a serial killer or she's not. No amount of mitigation is going to get her a reduced sentence.So if there are things from her childhood etc that are red flags can they not be used in the case and can only be released after the verdict?
Me too. Reporting is shockingly poorWhat time does the podcast usually drop? It really feels like nobody cares anymore. It’s not like we have some massive news this week either. I’m baffled.