Been following the trial and threads but lurking and never commenting. As the name suggests, im absolutely on the fence. Agreed, lots of information we read looks dodgy, but playing devils advocate, here are sone thoughts. (Random thoughts as im late to the commenting party may i add).
I think the NICU sounded particularly unsafe, re:staffing and decision making (taking a baby weighing 800g which would have certainly been safer in a level 3 unit), not checking critically low blood sugars for hours.
The maternity services.. The lady who had a terrible birth, 60 hours after waters went and no antibiotics, poor care!
The "watching for babys to self correct when desatting) this is common in any aspect of nursing, not too concerning for me, its common practice, you might adjust settings and appear to be watching, knowing with experience levels will go up.
The taking a baby off cpap who had obviously deteriorating gases, strange decision.
The air in vessels, 2 babies (i think) had new long lines put in (1 had it removed during resus) can we be sure these lines were primed?
Air via NG tubes. Other nurses handled these tubes, new nurses who may have been less experienced, is it beyond reasonable doubt that they couldnt have caused it?
Insulin... could this have been a complete incompetent medication error? Short staffed, over run, tired, no breaks, you arent focusing the same. Having reviewed many incidents as part of my work, they are very common! I.e patients given completely wrong medication for reasons unknown.
Theres so much dodgey ground for me, at this point if i was a juror, i could not say guilty beyond reasonable doubt... not saying shes innocent, just interested to hear the defence. Hey what if the doctors not primed the long lines, causing embulous, the nurses have been pushing air accidently down ng tubes, not knowing the harm it could cause, then theres been 2 huge meds errors (ive known of similar
) she could be a scapegoat... could be a calculated killer, theres no winners here.