This! ! so it does appear that the defence are trying discredit that there ever was a rash/mottling whatever you want to call it. Seems an odd line of defence imo, when letby herself referenced it!This was good detail in Mark's article.
The doctor said: “As I stated at the time I didn’t appreciate the clinical significance of this whatsoever. Over time, having seen it on further occasions and in retrospect, absolutely.”
When suggested to him by Mr Myers that he had not actually seen such discolouration, Dr Jayaram said: “As a paediatrician of 30 years and a doctor of 32 years, if my character was such that I would make things up I would hope, friends, colleagues, doctors, nurses, parents, families, would have picked up on this before now.”
If Ben Myers is going to question the integrity of all the 15-20+ experts and witnesses, it's going to come across very ridiculous to the jury.Not sure it's a great defence strategy to just blame everyone else for lying/misremembering. You can do it for one, it looks paranoid to blame all of them. Discrediting all the witnesses and experts only works if your client is a paragon of virtue and we've already seen she wasn't - she certainly made mistakes and wasn't meticulous or expressing any concerns herself over these children, other than stalking parents on FB.
The Dr saying that made me feel so sad. The baby would have had it’s nutritional needs met (either by bottle, ng tube or TPN). It would/should not have been hungry.Something that struck me as slightly odd was one doctor (Sandie something I think?) described one of the babies as crying/screaming in a really unusual way. She said she’d never heard a premature baby cry like that. Can’t remember which baby it was, but it stated it was born at 36 weeks which isn’t crazily premature.
I don’t really know what I’m even getting at but I did wonder could they be trying to alter to fit the narrative (maybe not!)
I just think it’s odd how they keep saying about these things they’ve never seen before, I just don’t fully trust some of the evidence given by doctors so far
Found it - Child N.
he was only apparently only a couple of weeks premature and babies really can scream, I’m sure of course more so if they are in pain/discomfort etc but I know they can scream if they’re hungry too. Obviously in this little one’s case he had a lot going on which could’ve caused the screaming,
hope I make some sense??
… anyways ignore me I can’t sleep and am rambling
But with this in mind then it’s probably better to rename the title? As it’s not really accurate.Fair point about sub judice. I know Tattle doesn't necessarily fall under the UK jurisdiction for this sort of thing. But since you've created the Wiki, I'd be careful about not adding anything non trial related as it could be held as contempt of court. Wouldn't risk it if I were you!
I wonder how easy or quick that would be to do though, as the evidence so far has others in the room with LL when she allegedly did this and the window of opportunity was around 5 to 10 mins or something wasn't it?Holy shit. Stomach flipping.
I assume it’s a connector that already exists? Which wouldn’t be used for line placement or UVC. But I’d like to understand the electronic pump system as it’s not been mentioned before now. But wondering how that works to prevent accidental air embolus.I wonder how easy or quick that would be to do though, as the evidence so far has others in the room with LL when she allegedly did this and the window of opportunity was around 5 to 10 mins or something wasn't it?
Definitely quite damning evidence though. Be interesting to see how the defence try and counter this
Timings wise I’m still confused, it seems we’ve not had much clear information on that from the press. It’s hard to know what the timings really were!I wonder how easy or quick that would be to do though, as the evidence so far has others in the room with LL when she allegedly did this and the window of opportunity was around 5 to 10 mins or something wasn't it?
Definitely quite damning evidence though. Be interesting to see how the defence try and counter this
That would give a lot of information needed!Timings wise I’m still confused, it seems we’ve not had much clear information on that from the press. It’s hard to know what the timings really were!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?