I agree generally with reporting restrictions in court so that the proceedings are fair. But
duck me the irony of Dan Wootton having the benefit of reporting restrictions for his case when Caroline didn’t & her case couldn’t have been more sensationalised & spread across the newspapers when some of what was reported was untrue-when a lot of this
bull reporting was by Wootton himself who claimed to be a friend of Caroline’s!
I think Andrew Brady lacks credibility because of the way he’s presented on social media, but at the heart of it I think his sentiments may be right.