PineappleQueen19
VIP Member
Laurens point is that money/influence has meant mainstream channels are turning a blind eye, so where else would you see it? Lauren is credible.Would hardly call it rumbling on when it's on some nutjob's YouTube channel
Laurens point is that money/influence has meant mainstream channels are turning a blind eye, so where else would you see it? Lauren is credible.Would hardly call it rumbling on when it's on some nutjob's YouTube channel
Rumi is a cutie. Apparently the son is autistic.Weird she keeps showing her daughters but nothing about her Son.
Did the other dancers smile?100% agree re: blue. I felt so sorry for her, watching the halftime show - she didn't smile once, she was stiff and clearly so focused on the moves. And why wouldn't she be, she's 12 years old, it must be terrifying to know the world is watching. But then I saw all the comments on Twitter of 'what a wonderful mother-daughter bonding moment' and 'how amazing that Blue is this talented as such a young age' and I just thought... am I looking at something entirely different?
Is this the writer from the daily mail article?I think the issue is none of the concerts sold out; ticket prices were significantly slashed and then tickets were actually given away for free through food banks. And that doesn't happen when you're at 80-90% capacity even - it happens when you have an embarrassingly low number of sales and you need to fill a very, very big space quickly.
I think it's great she's given tickets to good causes (even though it was done for the main purpose of bums in seats) - but I do disagree with the way she's gone about it; because her most loyal fans are the ones who have been shafted - paying £600-700 for a seat in the fan presale; which are then available for £140 the night before. I think it's a poor choice to have that crash in pricing; because it punishes the keenest and most loyal fans.
But she will need to start asking questions about the lack of natural sales; because something has gone wrong. Is it that she booked too large a venue for too many nights? Are people simply disinterested in Cowboy Carter? Is she simply a fading star and needs to accept it's time for smaller tours, venues, and more greatest hits to go on that nostalgia?
She really drew the eye to me so I went back to look, and yes, the majority of them were smiling.Did the other dancers smile?
Agree - as a casual listener it feels like this the same tour - but less Cowboy hats and more Blue Ivy danceathons.I think she’s toured too soon after the last tour. It doesn’t feel as special this time around. I haven’t gone but I went last time and was really excited.
And yet here you are describing a 12 year old child as 'gorgeous'Blue is gorgeous but she’s so inappropriately dressed for her age.
Me too but not soldier, green light or video phone just 90s, 2003,2006 and 2009I'd like a Destinys Child/Beyonce greatest hits tour. I have no interest in Beyonce's recent music.
Who edited that pic, look how long Blues fingers areStill out as a united force.
I thought wow, I had no idea Blue Ivy was an adult now. She's 12.
View attachment 3311196
Would hardly call it rumbling on when it's on some nutjob's YouTube channelThe Jay-Z paternity case rumbles on
Interesting, thank you.She cannot claim songwriting credits, just rewriting a bit doesn’t negate intellectual property rights, so this isn’t something she chose to do. Royalties here meaning streaming revenue, are very difficult due to how the music industry is set up, as rightsholders have deep structures, owning lyrics doesn’t equal getting (all) royalties (I've worked in an industry very adjacent to this so I sadly know way more about music royalties than I ever wanted to knowI promise I have more interesting hobbies). Beyoncé will have needed to request (this is a rather informal process though) to record a cover or make use of samples from Jolene, meaning royalties for melody, performance rights, etc also need to happen - she could have changed every word but the rightsholders of the melody and production would still get their share. If Dolly owns 50% of the lyrics rights and Beyonce owns the other half - but Dolly continues to own 100% of publishing rights, she effectively owns more than Beyonce.
I assume both parties will have come to an agreement that works for both ends - Dolly has refused to give Elvis Presley credit before for a song she wrote and for which he wanted 50%, so it's not like she doesn't know what she is doing.
Maybe because there isn't enough evidence to stand up legally or journalisticallyLaurens point is that money/influence has meant mainstream channels are turning a blind eye, so where else would you see it? Lauren is credible.
I don't know anything really about this paternity claim. A quick look seems to suggest it has been thrown out of court at lower levels and the recent case was withdrawn? Is there any actual evidence?Laurens point is that money/influence has meant mainstream channels are turning a blind eye, so where else would you see it? Lauren is credible.
Such as?Is there any actual evidence?