The marathons happened in 2010, vlogging was a big thing by then but no one taped any of these marathon runs except for the end of the last one. I think theres a newspaper article saying he was going to do them but apart from the photos at the end that seems to be it.I think there is some evidence that JA completed the marathons, although challenging it would be feasible for a sporty fit young person to manage it
The crowds and the closed streets the broken leg were bull. If I had to make a guess the heroically completing the race dispute severe injuries was because he was embarrassed about how slow he was towards the end and, instead of saying he overestimated his abilities but was proud he had completed his challenge like anyone else would, he came up that stupid implusable story to save face.
Well I guess Dr Overton's students now know that they are not allowed and must never complain about him: during, after, or in perpetuity.This lecturer in journalism is not only seemingly entirely ignorant of the guidelines around reporting suicide, but also very happy to openly state that whistleblowing students are 'culpable' for Arday's death.
View attachment 4092206
It's disappointing that so few people seem bothered by the falling academic standards exposed here. Sociology and sociology adjacent isn't quite my academic experience but I assume the quality checks should be same as stem? Research proposals should go before and ethics committee, research methodology should be decided and justified before data collection, a viva should show your work was considered and fully justifiable and fulfils the research brief. For senior appointments you should have a substantial publication history, peer reviewed in reputable journals, you should be widely cited and experienced in your field and preferred methodologies. The most import thing though is being a grant writing, funding attracting machine. He didn't seem to be any of those things, lying about having those attributes to gain a post is fraud no? Background is irrelevant
You what mate?
Hope this link works!
If she wasn't so complicit in this I would feel sorry for his ex wife. She raised two children at a relatively young age with him while studying herself, and then working to provide for them while he continued with his studies and lost them money too. She aided him in his job applications and probably completed a lot of his written course work while teaching him to read and write. No doubt she had to bolster his ego, tolerate his wild stories and ideas and do all the adulting too, while remaining slim and desirable to all other males but not outshine him.I have to admit grifters fascinate me.
I suspect as with all Walter Mitty type people, there is a kernel of truth in some of Arday’s fantasy land. He probably did complete several marathons and raise money. He was probably a decent snooker player. He may have had selective mutism. People who lie fanatically and repeatedly often select ‘fantasies’ that align as close to the truth as possible so that duping others is easier.
The excerpts of the book (thank you @Valiofthedolls ) are excruciatingly painful reading and is very much reminiscent of old pal, Jack Monroe.
I feel very sorry for his children.
Do people believe she taught him to read and write? Given he went to a "normal" primary school I assumed that part was another lieIf she wasn't so complicit in this I would feel sorry for his ex wife. She raised two children at a relatively young age with him while studying herself, and then working to provide for them while he continued with his studies and lost them money too. She aided him in his job applications and probably completed a lot of his written course work while teaching him to read and write. No doubt she had to bolster his ego, tolerate his wild stories and ideas and do all the adulting too, while remaining slim and desirable to all other males but not outshine him.
Yes, there is an obscure word in every paragraph. I've read it twice now.Blimey - Will Self is really up himself isn't he.
I honestly thought he died. Must have confused him with another pompous pontificating aBlimey - Will Self is really up himself isn't he.
Will Self J'accuses all of us.I hate all these media types wagging fingers at us and saying that we have no right to discuss something that someone decided to reveal of their own free will. How do they expect to police what people can discuss? And why is it okay for them to say whatever they want and then treat us like naughty children when we do the same.
In his biography, doesn't he talk about everyone being in matching orange(?) tops saying "I'm with jason" while his own top said "I'm Jason"?The marathons happened in 2010, vlogging was a big thing by then but no one taped any of these marathon runs except for the end of the last one. I think theres a newspaper article saying he was going to do them but apart from the photos at the end that seems to be it.
As well if someones that into running, they would generally run at least 1 official marathon like the London marathon or have a profile on strava etc
He should never have been on that salary in the first place!It does seem high, but his wife and children have now lost out on the support from his (significant) earnings, so they may well struggle without that.
ETA: 200K would be about 2 years of his approximate current salary
Thank you. I even plan to use all my own words!@goldenrodshortbread long may you continue to win funding and publish x
Well I’m seeing an absolute tit show in STEM so I’d guess it’s across the board. The pressure to publish is out of control, peer review seems to be useless, just write a paper, gather some data then ignore what it tells you and draw any conclusion you want, get it in a journal.It's disappointing that so few people seem bothered by the falling academic standards exposed here. Sociology and sociology adjacent isn't quite my academic experience but I assume the quality checks should be same as stem? Research proposals should go before and ethics committee, research methodology should be decided and justified before data collection, a viva should show your work was considered and fully justifiable and fulfils the research brief. For senior appointments you should have a substantial publication history, peer reviewed in reputable journals, you should be widely cited and experienced in your field and preferred methodologies. The most import thing though is being a grant writing, funding attracting machine. He didn't seem to be any of those things, lying about having those attributes to gain a post is fraud no? Background is irrelevant
Assuming they have a full time contract and aren't trying to scrape a full time salary across 2 or more postsThank you. I even plan to use all my own words!
Worth noting that an Oxbridge Chair pulls a salary of around £120k. Fellows/Lecturers/Associate Professors can earn as little as £40k. These are posts requiring doctoral qualification, teaching qualifications and often years of experience. Guess which job family has a higher percentage of women? *bursts into flame*
That's disappointing to readWell I’m seeing an absolute tit show in STEM so I’d guess it’s across the board. The pressure to publish is out of control, peer review seems to be useless, just write a paper, gather some data then ignore what it tells you and draw any conclusion you want, get it in a journal.
Even worse is humanities scholars writing about STEM subjects.
With 1/6 terms off for research!! It's incredible. Would there be any research targets for the sabattical?Thank you. I even plan to use all my own words!
Worth noting that an Oxbridge Chair pulls a salary of around £120k. Fellows/Lecturers/Associate Professors can earn as little as £40k. These are posts requiring doctoral qualification, teaching qualifications and often years of experience. Guess which job family has a higher percentage of women? *bursts into flame*
Would you like an example? Dr Cefai just published a doozyThat's disappointing to read![]()