The lips are shocking!!
Attachments
-
103.8 KB
The fact she got legally wed in her home town and then went off to France just goes to show that it was just a sham wedding so she could invite her influencer friends and do all those ads. So fake, she knew they would all be posting their pics and raving about the wedding...pure publicity. I can't believe I actually used to think she was a genuine person and rather humble...what was I thinking?!!!! Seems like a lot more effort went into her french wedding rather than the one at home with her close family, the people that matter.
PS thought that jumpsuit she wore at the legal wedding is awful, and doesn't fit well and what is her brother wearing, blimey he could have worn a suit or something!

Again, him doting on her and her looking away. These wedding pics, honestly. This whole thing has been a joke
Another undisclosed ad for the legal wedding outfits. If you search the hashtag she's used #tedtotoe others have managed to declare posts as ads.The fact she got legally wed in her home town and then went off to France just goes to show that it was just a sham wedding so she could invite her influencer friends and do all those ads. So fake, she knew they would all be posting their pics and raving about the wedding...pure publicity. I can't believe I actually used to think she was a genuine person and rather humble...what was I thinking?!!!! Seems like a lot more effort went into her french wedding rather than the one at home with her close family, the people that matter.
PS thought that jumpsuit she wore at the legal wedding is awful, and doesn't fit well and what is her brother wearing, blimey he could have worn a suit or something!
All publicity is good publicity I guessAnother undisclosed ad for the legal wedding outfits. If you search the hashtag she's used #tedtotoe others have managed to declare posts as ads.
Also why is she so pleased to have her wedding covered by The Sun?!![]()
I'm confused about the declarations they have to make. If a company, such as the wedding dress designer or Dior for the candles, gives them free goods but no money exchanged hands, does the influenza have to put ad in the post? Or do they simply have to tag it 'gifted'? Technically in my industry (marketing) an ad means you pay actual money for the space or promotion.just watched the wedding dress 'documentary'. How can this NOT be an Ad? Genuine question! I very much doubt Vic would have gone to the effort of creating a documentary about Philipa Lepley dress if she hadn't received a huge discount / for free / paid to.
perhaps she got stung by the bees sniffing around her lavender?The lips are shocking!!
Gifted, however if they were given things with specific coverage requirements (ie. we’ll give you this in exchange for 3 x Instagram posts) or gifted something AND paid for coverage, then that would need to be labelled as ad.I'm confused about the declarations they have to make. If a company, such as the wedding dress designer or Dior for the candles, gives them free goods but no money exchanged hands, does the influenza have to put ad in the post? Or do they simply have to tag it 'gifted'? Technically in my industry (marketing) an ad means you pay actual money for the space or promotion.
That's just for the ASA. The new CMA guidance says even gifts have to be tagged as ADsGifted, however if they were given things with specific coverage requirements (ie. we’ll give you this in exchange for 3 x Instagram posts) or gifted something AND paid for coverage, then that would need to be labelled as ad.
Hum, that does say “you’ve been given to promote” which (I may be wrong) to me sounds like you’ve been given on the understanding that you would promote the item (ie. specific postage requirements), rather than just given the item without any requirements? It’s not super clear, either way!That's just for the ASA. The new CMA guidance says even gifts have to be tagged as ADs
The CMA state it should say AD, however, influencers have been labelling them as gifted or PR - which is fine as people know they're gifted and haven't been paid for, and when a brand has paid them, it's labeled as AD or 'In Paid Partnership'. However, she's not labeled anything (except for the Dior candles) as gifted. The dresses, the suits, favours, flowers - nothing is labelled as gifted, leading viewers to believe she has paid for everything else which is totally against the ASA/CMA regulations. Hence why I don't understand why she's leaving herself wide open for reporting, when to be fair to her, in all her other posts or videos, she's said what is gifted, paid for or sponsored.I'm confused about the declarations they have to make. If a company, such as the wedding dress designer or Dior for the candles, gives them free goods but no money exchanged hands, does the influenza have to put ad in the post? Or do they simply have to tag it 'gifted'? Technically in my industry (marketing) an ad means you pay actual money for the space or promotion.
Maybe if none of her videos have gone viral, it’s because she’s a tit influencer who endlessly flogs ads at peopleReally good point. All of her photos should be declared as gifted
She’s an embarrassment
View attachment 39680
So her poor nanna wasn’t even invited to the wedding party in ‘Provence’! It really was just one big ad and party for influencers and gleam folk. What about having your family there for the party? Surely that’s what makes it special?! I know her family were there for the legal ceremony in Wigan but seems cold to arrange a party abroad where they couldn’t come. I guess Vik cares about the money more than celebrating with her family. Terrible.
Now watching the video, and I might have to turn it off, her lisp is insane, has she got braces and I missed it or something like that? Or fixtures or something? It's the type of lisp you see in those situations. I used to love her when she was doing primark hauls in her room and I don't recall it then?
Gifted, however if they were given things with specific coverage requirements (ie. we’ll give you this in exchange for 3 x Instagram posts) or gifted something AND paid for coverage, then that would need to be labelled as ad.
Probably because she doesn't want criticism for having a heavily / mostly sponsored wedding (which it was). I don't see many people other than on here and GG calling her out on it. So she's fooled the masses as she wanted. Really irks me. I'm sending in my complaint. My industry has to follow strict ad guidelines and so should influencers.The CMA state it should say AD, however, influencers have been labelling them as gifted or PR - which is fine as people know they're gifted and haven't been paid for, and when a brand has paid them, it's labeled as AD or 'In Paid Partnership'. However, she's not labeled anything (except for the Dior candles) as gifted. The dresses, the suits, favours, flowers - nothing is labelled as gifted, leading viewers to believe she has paid for everything else which is totally against the ASA/CMA regulations. Hence why I don't understand why she's leaving herself wide open for reporting, when to be fair to her, in all her other posts or videos, she's said what is gifted, paid for or sponsored.
She had lingual braces for 2 years! Now Invisalign?She has invisalign and I assume that’s where the lisp comes from, it seems to be getting worse and worse and that baby voiced “babe, aw babe” isn’t helping![]()