I can’t understand your rationale.I will admit I was rather drunk last night, so that post not making a massive amount of sense is perhaps not surprising.
What I meant was that I think the person who pulls the trigger is just as responsible as anyone else, even if they're not legally responsible, but that they *should* be legally responsible, and that's a failure of local laws if not.
it’s like accusing the waiter of giving you food poisoning for serving undercooked meat.
There will be investigations - a legal one and an insurance one.
They will establish hirings, qualifications whether standards were met etc.
The insurance people will want to know if correct procedures were followed (if not they’re not going to foot the bill)
The criminal one will establish any negligence/foul play etc