acca00
Chatty Member
I used to post here but got a bit bored as Markle was just way too fake/crazy, BUT:
This is total bullshit. It's part of her PR drive to stop negative press. The fact that it starts with "Are you OK?", a twisting of the South Africa comment she got so much criticism for, shows that all this has been carefully and minutely crafted for her image. Just like the letter to her father.
I feel she is totally hollow inside. She cares only for her public image. This is in the same style as the letter - over-the-top sentiment, her as a victim, a "saintly good person" - placed in the NYT, home of liberal political-media America.
Next we'll hear about her new pregnancy. Then she'll withdraw from the court case, paying out - but spinning it that she needs to move on, and only doing so for her family and everyone else's welfare. The truth: she's been caught lying and was bound to lose. Then we'll have the Netflix documentary, showing her as a "good person trying to do good" and battling the press and social media. All fake, set-up scenes.
Any criticism now from the press, she can just play the victim and almost shame any press for daring criticise her.
This NYT piece is pure PR. Nobody writes in such flowery language unless it's a creative writing essay. It's all very Lena Dunham. And I don't buy any of it for one single second.
It's classic journalism: starts off with a personal anecdote, then segues into other stuff. She talks mostly about George Floyd, COVID, then society and empathy. It's just PC PR, all for her image, what she exists for.
This is total bullshit. It's part of her PR drive to stop negative press. The fact that it starts with "Are you OK?", a twisting of the South Africa comment she got so much criticism for, shows that all this has been carefully and minutely crafted for her image. Just like the letter to her father.
I feel she is totally hollow inside. She cares only for her public image. This is in the same style as the letter - over-the-top sentiment, her as a victim, a "saintly good person" - placed in the NYT, home of liberal political-media America.
Next we'll hear about her new pregnancy. Then she'll withdraw from the court case, paying out - but spinning it that she needs to move on, and only doing so for her family and everyone else's welfare. The truth: she's been caught lying and was bound to lose. Then we'll have the Netflix documentary, showing her as a "good person trying to do good" and battling the press and social media. All fake, set-up scenes.
Any criticism now from the press, she can just play the victim and almost shame any press for daring criticise her.
This NYT piece is pure PR. Nobody writes in such flowery language unless it's a creative writing essay. It's all very Lena Dunham. And I don't buy any of it for one single second.
It's classic journalism: starts off with a personal anecdote, then segues into other stuff. She talks mostly about George Floyd, COVID, then society and empathy. It's just PC PR, all for her image, what she exists for.
Last edited:
reaction with you. While loss and grief are things you may get through, you definitely never get over them and I’m thankful for your reminding me of this quote:
it has been done deliberately.
)I watched in fascination as my OH conversed with her tits when required to speak to her. I asked him privately to please not do that, it was embarrassing ... he said he didn't do it ... and continued doing it. So one day I said to him in front of her "Sweetheart ( sarcasm overload) try talking to Polly's face. I'm sure you consistently talking to her breasts makes her uncomfortable(EXTREME sarcasm cos we both knew she didn't give a flying fuck)." He was mortified, but she just laughed, because she knew what she/he was doing and was enjoying the power her massive weapons of male destruction gave her. My OH didn't speak to me(or my tits
) for two days. Bliss.
