Yes definitely experienced the sort of behaviour described in the dress fitting story. Once they get in to a rage they lose it, I think that they actually enjoy it.
Yes definitely experienced the sort of behaviour described in the dress fitting story. Once they get in to a rage they lose it, I think that they actually enjoy it.I can. I see her micro expressions, the ones where she's given away her true reaction and then quickly rearranges her expression. I can see her rage in those micro expressions and I definitely believe that at that moment she is absolutely furious. In my mind she's more than capable of throwing anything she can at the transgressors.
Child of a Narc Mother here and you wouldn't believe what she's chucked at me over the last 50 years. Markle's expressions in those split seconds are scary.
It was probably on the do not mention list.She didn't ask a single challenging question
Exactly... He came forward to admit he acted illegally and was paid 250 dollars.I'm confused, why has a journalist admitted invading their privacy without anyone knowing what dirt was uncovered?
Did they just admit it at random?
I dont mind that he married a wrong un. I did too! Haha! I was duped. I think he was as well but I also think he is a spoiled , entitled twat.I don’t hate Harry for being entitled, demanding, lazy, fake, immature, selfish, lacking integrity, petulant, unaware or stupid.
i just can’t stand him because he married an absolute wrong un, a complete nobody, and forced us all to have to bear her.
I’m sick of seeing her face in news stories and social media because of whatever latest drama she has kicked up.
he could have had his choice of women, he literally scrapped the barrel, then trotted her down the aisle in a tiara and forced everyone to curtesy as though she wasn’t a pig in lipstick. That’s the real outrage here.
if he was so full of self hatred to marry someone totally unsuitable why couldn’t he have done so as a private citizen after stepping back? That way the rest of us wouldn’t have had to suffer her and her delusions of grandeur
I may be wayyy off but has anyone else considered the possibility that all these new leaks of her outlandish behaviour are coming from Meghan's camp? They are way OTP even posters here have doubted them and we all believe the worst of MM
They could be massively exaggerated stories of tamer (but still her acting like a diva) things shes done but doesn't want the public to know, then if the true version does get out people will think "I can see how she acted unreasonable but at least it isn't as bad as slapping a shop assistant / throwing stones at a massage therapist which we were led to believe".
All these stories being leaked are also good for them as its adding to their victim narrative "poor us, why is the palace not denying these stories" and creating more pressure on the Palace to respond, which I don't think they will
But wouldn't she have been receiving medical check-ups during her pregnancy ... and wouldn't they have asked her how she was feeling as part of that?I think it's bullshit made up for sympathy. But what I do believe is, that if there is any element of her telling the truth, there is no way the Royal Family would have told her she couldn't receive help.
I really meant was she excluded from the senior royal group because of her behaviour, perhaps if she had behaved properly she and Harry would have still been senior royals. I guess I'm saying if she was a decent person rather than who she is.I don't think her behaviour would have been any different. Markle seems to think that it's her right to be above the Queen. Nothing else will do for that fucking What Freda says
He looks like he doesnt want to be there and she looks in control and in charge (check out the dominant arm position on pwoor owld Smegsy).It’s just more virtue signalling as you say. Plus the fact no one is allowed to question it. CF’s family and friends said in the weeks before her death she was a nervous wreck, anxious and terrified about her future. She often had people come in and check on her to make sure she was ok.
This was M around the sort of time she suggested/implied she was ‘suicidal’/ ‘didn’t want to be alive’. There’s ‘putting on a brave face’ and then there’s this. I’m calling BS on it, sorry
View attachment 488035View attachment 488036
Narcs can suffer with their mental health when they aren’t getting their way, that’s my only reasoning I can think of for any issues she said she was having
I think that she and Harry were excluded from that group because they are NOT and never were Senior Royals. Harry ceased being a senior Royal when Prince George was born.I really meant was she excluded from the senior royal group because of her behaviour, perhaps if she had behaved properly she and Harry would have still been senior royals. I guess I'm saying if she was a decent person rather than who she is.
think they would just go with Mountbatten-Windsor, it is the surname she decreed her non-HRH, non-Prince/Princess title holding and female descendants who marry would use - it was used as Anne’s surname on her wedding register to Mark PhillipsI’m actually interested in what they will have as their “surname” if the titles are returned to the crown. So he will be Prince Henry of...... where?
Obviously he was Prince Henry of Wales from birth but surely that will look a bit strange once his brother inherits Prince of Wales? William’s children will surely then be of Wales as the Cambridge dukedom will be returned?
Harry could use Cornwall as his father had the dukedom of Cornwall upon his birth but still a tad odd as his brother will inherit that also.
I wonder if a new precedent will occur and he will be Prince Henry of Mountbatten- Windsor?
Hi everybody! I'm new here, American (big deal) and loathe ME-ME-MEGHAN. I think Prince Harry has made the mistake of his LIFE and is going to bitterly regret marrying this manipulative monster. She is positively wearing the pants/trousers in this marriage, and leading poor Harry by his ex-royal nose. Little Miss Innocent "didn't know what she was marrying into"? Really? After reading everything she could find on Diana? LIE. She never looked up her prince on the internet? LIE. This sham interview with Miss Rating$-Obsessed Oprah was a disgrace, but now the world knows what she really is. As for Oprah, she asked every question wrapped in velvet. God forbid ANYONE upsets poor me Meaghan!Thought I would post this because apparently this bit was cut from the actual interview? I couldn’t stomach watching the whole thing so wouldn’t know.
M is referring to the ‘waity Katy’ thing, and basically dismissing K’s years of being berated in the press as if it was nothing. Kate got stick for her weight, her ‘partying’, her family, her status as a ‘commoner’, you name it- and for years. I’ve even seen that they put the phrase ‘waity Katy- will she have to wait forever?’ on the side of a London bus!
M is such a hideous liar- what racism? Can she provide a single headline/article that isn’t doctored or taken out of context?View attachment 487814View attachment 487815View attachment 487816
ETA - Charles holds 2 Ducal titles, so could William keep Cambridge and also be Duke of Cornwall?think they would just go with Mountbatten-Windsor, it is the surname she decreed her non-HRH, non-Prince/Princess title holding and female descendants who marry would use - it was used as Anne’s surname on her wedding register to Mark Phillips
I never knew that Princess Anne had used the name. I presumed she would have plain Windsorthink they would just go with Mountbatten-Windsor, it is the surname she decreed her non-HRH, non-Prince/Princess holding and female descendants who marry would use - it was used as Anne’s surname on her wedding register to Mark Phillips
My eyes !!! The glare from those legs !!
She really believes in her mind that she and Harry (well, she) should have the same status and rights as Kate and William. She's delusional! She's probably also one of those people who thinks that because they're the same age, they automatically should be treated the same.I still haven't stopped cringing about their behaviour, they weren't senior Royals but wanted to be seen as that for clout
I believe it is fully intended for William to be Duke of Cornwall and return his Cambridge dukedom upon becoming The Prince of Wales. I believe the Duke of Rothesay is Charles’ Scottish title and usually only addressed as such when visiting Scotland.ETA - Charles holds 2 Ducal titles, so could William keep Cambridge and also be Duke of Cornwall?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?